|
Iran, unlike Iraq, has not had a depleted military from the vestiges of Desert Storm. Iran has received support from China, Russia and France.
Assuming the world's most advanced countries opted to stay on the sidelines, do we believe that any support would be avaiable for any subsequent attack on the US?
How could we say such an attack on our civilians was not justified beacuse we empowered our leaders to do nothing to prevent it from occuring? The civilian casualities would be enormous there (Iran)...and what about blowback, as if our foreign and energy policies since the mid 1900's are not bad enough?
How does this legitimately differ from invading Poland, Czechlosavkia and Austria? The same saber-rattling applied as justification. Let's say we can do it, because we can. Does this result in "might makes right?"
What then would prevent China from invading Taiwan and South Korea under similar pretenses? Venezuela would seek Russian support to protect its borders and the whole option of preventive first strikes creates justification (remember Pearl Harbor?). How about a Sino-Russo pact if things get hairy?
The point is right here, right now we will either watch in the manner German citizens did in the late 1930's and early 1940's as their young men are recruited for the "noble" cause or we will act with resolve sooner than later.
The alternative to this debacle is cut the BS and invest the tens or hundreds of billions needed to produce alternative energy instead of maintaining occupancy of Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, which if one bothers to examine on a world map border each other and puts Russia in the unenviable position of spooling up its own military, nuclear arsenal and reformation of the former Soviet bloc. Yes, hthe US will have a decisive first strike, but the occupation will be a bettle of attrition.
This is not a movie, this is a real take. I warned a group of College Democrats at Brown in November that this could occur before 2010 and they looked at me like I went to public school, which I did.
Being a Marine vet with combat and staff planning experience forces one to think of the world in pieces of a puzzle with "what if" planning.
Now folks understand why I believe that post election 2006 and waiting till 2008 is way too late for Impeachment. Further, putting the US in a battle footing has historic foundation in political motivation.
The public seldom changes its elected officials in time of war and it opens a third nightmare scenario where King George's toilet paper called our Constitution has its amendment removed permitting a third term in office. I think it's time to restore the color coded alerts and declare that our country is at a red alert and the threat is from within.
I welcome folks' thoughts and input.
Carl Sheeler for US Senate (D-RI) www.carlsheeler.com carl@carlsheeler.com
|