Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush and the Trailers - Scotty Responds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:38 AM
Original message
Bush and the Trailers - Scotty Responds
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 11:42 AM by kpete
Bush publicly stated on May 29, 2003 that "We have found the weapons of mass destruction."

THE PRESIDENT: We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. You remember when Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said, Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/g8/interview5.html

McClellan did not directly answer questions about whether Bush, when he made his statement, was aware that a team of experts had already concluded the trailers were not involved with WMD manufacturing.

"The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," McClellan said.

Today Scotty McClellan said that the President ignored the findings of the Pentagon released two days earlier (May 27) and chose instead to follow the May 28 DIA/CIA report that stated the trailers were part of a biological weapons program.

McClellan said information for public reports from the CIA comes from many sources and takes time to vet.

"It's not something that, they will tell you, turns on a dime," McClellan said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060412/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq.

If that's true, then what in the hell was the president doing publicly declaring "We have found the weapons of mass destruction" THE VERY NEXT DAY?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/11/AR2006041101888.html
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/12/12310/6823

Despite having authoritative evidence that the biological laboratories claim was false, the administration continued to peddle the myth over the next four months. Below is a compilation of the administration’s false statements specifically in regards to the biological facilities from Powell, Wolfowitz, Rice, Bolton, Bush, Cheney:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/12/lies-about-wmd/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. because he is a liar. and so is scotty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency,"
Uh, that's quite clear!

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. And why did they classify the pentagon report?
But continue to site the fact that WMD labs had been found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency,"
Thats for damn sure. Don't look there if you need facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dan Rather got canned for not waiting to fully vet a story.
The Republicans jumped all over him for that and caused his ouster.

But now, the Chimperor makes a glaringly false statement to back his war fable without waiting for it to be vetted at all, much less fully, and the Repugs are defending him? So, once again Bush shoots from the hip whenever it bolsters his story without waiting for all the facts.

How exactly does this help Bush's credibility, Scotty?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Apparently they don't mind turning on a dime when it comes to making
claims about shit that supports their actions. Otherwise it's "these things take time"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. They turned out to be sand toilets!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Mr. Tenet, I order you to say to me that these trailers were part
of a biological weapons program."

"But that would be a lie, sir."

"Mr. Tenet, I am your Commander-in-Chief. Obey my order immediately!"

"Yes sir, Mr. pResident. These trailers are part of a biological weapons program."

"Thank, you Mr. Tenet. That will be all".

And that is exactly how Bu*h can claim that he based his claims on false intelligence. The freakin'CIA knew damn well that the trailers were not part of a biological weapons program. They are not stupid.

But the fact remains, this is still a deliberate deception on Bu*h's part, no matter how you spin it.

Bu*h deliberately lied us into a war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC