Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Subcommittee Voted To Kill Internet (From meme at Daily Kos)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:10 PM
Original message
House Subcommittee Voted To Kill Internet (From meme at Daily Kos)
If there is one thing the corporate owned Congress cannot stand, it's an empowered American People. Too much information for us, is bad for them, it means they are likely to get away with less and increases the chances of them being held accountable for their poor decisions and misdeeds. To this end they will do everything in their power to make the internet less accessible to the masses.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/11/194439/884

A House subcommittee handed phone companies a victory Wednesday by voting 27-4 to advance a bill that would make it easier for them to deliver television service over the Internet and clearing the way for all Internet carriers to charge more for speedier delivery.

The lopsided vote was a defeat for Internet and technology firms like Google and Microsoft, which had hoped to amend the bill to enforce a principle called network neutrality and preserve the status quo under which all Internet traffic is treated equally.

Earlier in the day, the subcommittee voted 23-8 to reject an amendment by Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., that would have inserted specific language designed to enforce network neutrality and prevent the feared creation of fast and slow lanes on the Internet.

<snip>

Members from both sides of the aisle endorsed a plan which will permit cable and phone companies to construct 'pay as you surf, pay as you post' toll booths for the Internet," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy in Washington.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. we need to contact our reps and senators before this gets out of hand
Freedom of speech through the internet!

Next thing we know, they'll be screening content like Yahoo and Google do to "serve" the Chinese government so the Chinese people won't know anything about Tianamen Sq. and the '89 massacre, or anything else related to freedom in China.

It could happen here if we snooze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Personally, I believe money is the secondary issue,
their primary motivation is power and control. Information is power, and if the American People are blissfully ignorant, they could not be happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. How bad could it be?
Just like cable, if you want the extras ya gotta pay for them. I'm sure the government will provide a 'basic plan' for netsurfers who don't want to pay -- and Fox will be happy to supply the news links for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That basic plan
will have;

1. filtered searches
2. restricted lists of websites you can visit
3. those websites will be entirely comercial sites

The rest of the internet will be broken up into arbitrary "zones" of some kind, so you'll have to buy access to all those zones to get everything you get now.

Sites will all start having intro screens where you need to give a credit card number or a subscription ID to enter. Nothing will be free anymore. Hosting charges will skyrocket, and we'll be the ones paying for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The real laugh is
that idea would be ridiculously difficult to implement, and those skilled in the dark arts of IP and proxies and routing could circumvent any "fences". It would be a cat and mouse game. That said, go to the free press site and sign that petition - it auto-sends to your rep and senators. Hopefully I'll hear back from Sen. Feingold, his office responds pretty rapidly when I write in. Russ rocks. :D

Todd in Beerbratistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyway, six Dems joined the evil Republican majority on this bill in the s
Thanks Dems,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, we need a new color coded map,
blue for the democratic party controlled states, red for the republicans, and gold for the corporate controlled states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They're all more or less corporate controlled states.
It's just a matter of which corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thanks, I should have made a distinction between,
corporation and corpwhoration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrspeeker Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hats off to the Dem's again
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 12:34 PM by Mrspeeker
Way to show some opposition..oh and fuck all six of you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, once again most of the Dems support big money
instead of freedom and equality. The digital divide will now have a more segregated class structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Members of the House Telecom Subcommittee
Pukes:

Fred Upton, Michigan
Chairman

Michael Bilirakis, Florida

Cliff Stearns, Florida

Paul E. Gillmor, Ohio

Ed Whitfield, Kentucky

Barbara Cubin, Wyoming

John Shimkus, Illinois

Heather Wilson, New Mexico

Charles "Chip" Pickering, Mississippi

Vito Fossella, New York

George Radanovich, California

Charles F. Bass, New Hampshire

Greg Walden, Oregon

Lee Terry, Nebraska

Mike Ferguson, New Jersey

John Sullivan, Oklahoma

Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee

Joe Barton, Texas
(Ex Officio)


Dems

Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts
Ranking Member

Eliot L. Engel, New York

Albert R. Wynn, Maryland

Mike Doyle, Pennsylvania

Charles A. Gonzalez, Texas

Jay Inslee, Washington

Rick Boucher, Virginia

Edolphus Towns, New York

Frank Pallone Jr., New Jersey

Sherrod Brown, Ohio

Bart Gordon, Tennessee

Bobby L. Rush, Illinois

Anna G. Eshoo, California

Bart Stupak, Michigan

John D. Dingell, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for the list Greeby,
I wonder if anyone has a list of the six dems that voted for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Definitely not Markey
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 03:24 PM by Greeby
While that'd be obvious from the amendment he offered. "Net Neutrality" is one of the major issues on his website:

http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=531&Itemid=138


And I understand Sherrod Brown was out on the campaign trail while this was going on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Representative Markey has my respect and he would have my vote
if I lived in Massachusetts.:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick for the afternoon crowd.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. So so sad
What is the matter with them?

Are they doing this just in order to get support for their campaigns from the telecommunications industry?

Are they doing it so that they don't get targeted by the corporate media?

Or are they just ignorant of the consequences?

I pray that this kind of thing will begin to reverse itself after the mid-term elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. All the reasons you cited and
I believe in their heart of hearts, they do not want to be held accountible for their actions. The internet makes hiding the truth more difficult, they think of them selves more as royalty than honest representatives of the American People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. This needs to be nipped in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC