Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(PNAC) "Cabal" Blocked 2003 Nuclear Talks with Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:26 PM
Original message
(PNAC) "Cabal" Blocked 2003 Nuclear Talks with Iran
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 01:28 PM by Roland99
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=32672

WASHINGTON, Mar 28 (IPS) - The George W. Bush administration failed to enter into negotiations with Iran on its nuclear programme in May 2003 because neoconservative zealots who advocated destabilisation and regime change were able to block any serious diplomatic engagement with Tehran, according to former administration officials.

The same neoconservative veto power also prevented the administration from adopting any official policy statement on Iran, those same officials say.

Lawrence Wilkerson, then chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, says the failure to adopt a formal Iran policy in 2002-2003 was the result of obstruction by a "secret cabal" of neoconservatives in the administration, led by Vice Pres. Dick Cheney.

"The secret cabal got what it wanted: no negotiations with Tehran," Wilkerson wrote in an e-mail to IPS.



Well, they got what they wanted. Perhaps this is something that Wilson was alluding to in his recent interview with Larisa of RawStory? The Vulcans/neocons/PNACers got their destabilized Middle East so the US and the massive military-industrial complex could come in and save the day and secure the oil in the Middle East for all of humanity.

See, they're really thinking of others and not their cronies leading the defense contractors.


And thanks to DUer Darkhawk32 that pointed me to the article.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is the GOP going to kick these leeches out?
Or join them? If they don't clean house NOW, they are all doomed. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, Rice has some fingers pointed at her and her complicity.
Cheney is the mastermind of this foreign policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Same insane cabal operated in same fashion during Ike/JFK years
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 01:37 PM by EVDebs
THE SABOTAGING OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
by L. Fletcher Prouty
reprinted with permission of the author
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/SAP.html#begin

Also, Allen Dulles' manuevering to get Henry Wallace labelled a 'spy' and out as v.p. while covering his own tracks in dealing with the Axis on rat lines and money removals via Switzerland, if any care to research this, would show similar corroboration of the cabal's existence.

Dulles' CIA and the Knights of Malta connections are always aristocratic. The poor never stand a chance.

The key phrase in original post "secret cabal". Right on the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is being discussed on Talk of the Nation right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. dammit, nevermind
they just wrapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I guess this link will have the audio after 6pm Eastern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. good deal
it was a pretty good update PNAC'rs and Iran policy. The american enterprise institute guy was backed neatly into a corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Aren't they always?
Ever seen/heard a debate with Perle, Hitchens or someone like that? Their insanity is glaring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. wondering out loud today...
is it going to be nearly as good when they finally take these bastards to the cooler as we've been hoping? i mean, i just have this fear that the Feiths and Perles will quietly be frog-marched to whereever, and we'll all just be like, "is that all there is?"

i, for one, PROMISE big celebratory frolicing. i'll remember the date and honor it every year like D-day!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hell, I'd settle for indictments at this point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. subpoenas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Audio is already live
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Finally got a chance to listen to it. Pretty good story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. October 1983?
At the end of the piece it reads:

"Nevertheless, Pres. Bush apparently initially saw nothing wrong with trading information on MEK, despite arguments that MEK should not be repatriated to Iran. "I have it on good authority," Leverett told IPS, "that Bush's initial reaction was, 'But we say there is no such thing as a good terrorist'." Nevertheless, Bush finally rejected the Iranian proposal.

By the end of May, the neoconservatives had succeeded in closing down the Geneva channel for good. They had hoped to push through their own NSPD on Iran, but according to the Franklin indictment, in October 1983, Franklin told an Israeli embassy officer that work on the NSPD had been stopped. "

I don't understand this. :shrug: Help? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Probably a typo (or confused it with an investigation of Feith in 1983)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That was the one thing that stuck out
and threw me for a loop. Couldn't figure out if they meant to say Oct 2003, or that it was a different agent back in '83.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does anyone need any more proof of the real reason behind all
the threats arainst Iran? This is insane, or fiendishly evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. To split hairs ...
... cabals are by definition secret and/or secretive. "Secret cabal" is redundant.

The dates are interesting - the neo-con high-water mark, before Iraq went sour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hersh: "Bush doesn't talk to people he's mad at."
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/12/1359254

Check out the last few paragraphs.



:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC