Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia on Cheney Case - "proudest thing" he's done on the court.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:50 PM
Original message
Scalia on Cheney Case - "proudest thing" he's done on the court.
By STEPHANIE REITZ, Associated Press Writer

Conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Wednesday called his 2004 decision not to recuse himself from a case involving Vice President Dick Cheney the "proudest thing" he's done on the court.

Scalia's remarks came as he took questions from students during a lecture at the University of Connecticut's law school.

The case in question involved Cheney's request to keep private the details of closed-door White House strategy sessions that produced the administration's energy policy.

The administration fought a lawsuit brought by watchdog and environmental groups that contended that industry executives, including former Enron chairman Ken Lay, helped shape that policy. The Supreme Court upheld the administration position on a 7-2 vote.

Scalia refused to step aside from deliberations in the case, rejecting arguments by critics who said his impartiality was brought into question because of a hunting vacation that he took with Cheney while the court was considering the vice president's appeal.

"For Pete's sake, if you can't trust your Supreme Court justice more than that, get a life," he said Wednesday.

cont'd...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060412/ap_on_go_su_co/scalia_cheney_recusal;_ylt=Ag0GcJmZaU7sn.GJiXZaathMEP0E;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. A DU'er posted that she asked Scalia some hard questions about recusal!
this could very well have been her! Same timeframe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. it's sad when a hard question is so rare that it makes an AP story
The Duer (I saw the thread the other day too-she so totally rocks!) should feel proud of herself for this and yet it makes me sad that this isn't just what normally happens. When did we get royalty that cannot be challenged? I want to go throw some tea in the ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. What an embarrassment he is
What a scoundrel to sit on the Supreme Court. I daresay the giants who preceded him are spinning in their graves.

Well, he's a chainsmoker and he's obese. Let's hope those virtues of his work in our favor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Might Be Too Late, Leftie!
But, thanks for using "scoundrel". That's the perfect word for him.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Yeah, that was deliberate
I'm so ashamed of his antics - which seem to be getting worse, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. He gets fatter every time I see him.
It's only a matter of time before his ticker wears out on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Did you realize
that he's 70 years old?

I didn't realize he was that old.

Let us hope...........

Tick, tick, tick, tick, ti
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. WOW!!!
No. I didn't realize. Maybe his fat ass will be gone sooner than expected?

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee, what a great act of judicial courage
Not recusing yourself from a case which involves your good buddy.

:thumbsdown:

How did this guy manage to get on the same bench that once seated men like John Marshall and Thurgood Marshall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's not my supreme court justice. Is he yours?
"For Pete's sake, if you can't trust your Supreme Court justice more than that, get a life," he said Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. good point
and he seems to get loonier every day.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/999005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Key Quote from this Troll
"For Pete's sake, if you can't trust your Supreme Court justice more than that, get a life," he said Wednesday.


Why should we trust you? You have shown how much you hate the Constitution and the United States every chance you get?

You really hate being challenged, don't you asshole? Are you compenstating for something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Interesting response.
As if the fact that Scalia is a complete nut case has escaped their observation. So much for the "takes one to know one" theory.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who's Pete and why does he care more about him
than being an honorable Justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Notoverit Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now I'm hurt! I thought Bush vs Gore would be!
From his fertile mind:

Federal courts should ". . . tell the people to take a walk.
> The Constitution is to protect us against the will of the people."
Scalia 2.12 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am so over this tool. OVER! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. How embarrassing
20+ years on the bench, and all he can say he's proud of is refusing to recluse himself from a crony's case. I'm sure Justices Marshall, Holmes & Cardozo aren't very proud of him. Scalia is incredibly testy & obnoxious anymore. Must be getting hard to defend this Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Self delete. Read again....this happened today.
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 02:06 PM by sinkingfeeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's proud of being an arrogant fascist prick..that's nice...
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 02:12 PM by Virginia Dare
no wonder he and the Dickless wonder are such big buddies.
:grr: :grr: :grr: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :grr: :grr: :grr:

edited for spelling, I was so pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Get a life?" Why don't you grow up? What an immature ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clear indication who's pocket Scalia is in...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. He should go hunting with Cheney again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hey Scalia!
vaffanculo! It's sicilian.

As if the founders of our country were all about trust? We'll just throw out 3 branches of government then because we don't need any checks and balances. Everybody should just trust everybody. Now let's all hold hands and sing Koom by yah. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Well, Here's What I Was Thinking?
Is he talking about trusting a Supreme Court justice in the abstract, or himself? One of those i generally would trust. The other, not! You can all figure out which is which.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm sure the students were mightily impressed with his...
maturity and intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. He's just quoting himself
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 03:21 PM by MurrayDelph
from his new Self-Help Book:

"I'm OK. YOU'RE the one with the Problem!"





(edited to add illustration)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. What a thug n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's the Sicilian Code thing
You never show disrespect for your capo. Even if it means insulting everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC