Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2009: 100 mpg Toyota Prius

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:02 AM
Original message
2009: 100 mpg Toyota Prius
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=109981

TOKYO — Expect something amazing from the next Toyota Prius — like fuel economy that pushes past the 100-mpg barrier.

Due in two years as a 2009 model, the next Prius is set to be an evolution, company sources say. The hybrid will retain the same basic 1.5-liter hybrid drivetrain. But Toyota is now on a mission to do two things: drive the economy ratings skyward, and cut the associated costs by 20-30 percent.

{more at link}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dog bless them!
The planet needs this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Damn ben. I love that. "Dog bless them!" Did you make that one up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
126. Yes, but I'm probably not the first to use it!
Too obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder how much energy is needed to produce the car battery and how
toxic this battery is. I have read that plug in electric cars actually require lots of burning of coal to produce the electricity to run the car. Very toxic. Hopefully someone will study this and tell me I am a pessimistic crazy person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Electricity comes from many places....
Coal, wind, nat. gas, water... now we need to work on getting rid of the ones that pollute. :)

Oregon is working on more wind farms...
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8GTV6RO1.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&chan=db
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Correct....
Here in WA you can choose to purchase a portion of your energy from renewable. Which we gladly pitch in a modest amount more every month......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
130. Nor should we tolerate the ones that harm birds or fish. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #130
140. When do you plan on stopping all your electricity use?
If Wind is bad, and Water, and Coal, and Gas, and Nuclear... I guess you're going to be outta luck, unless you install Solar. Let us know how that goes for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #140
170. Maybe I’ll just get a Prius and plug my house into it.
I’ve looked at solar, but in my neck of the woods it makes no sense (too far North). The panels would be lucky to produce as much energy in their lifetime as it took to manufacture and bring them to market. Add to that the problem of keeping them clean, storing energy for night and cloudy days, plus inverters for items that don’t like AC. The payback period is very, very long if not infinite.

There was a company that wanted to build a wind farm on the cornfields to the South of me, but the objections were numerous. Bird deaths, noise, ugly, and on and on, you would have thought that they wanted to conduct atmospheric nuclear explosions. I don’t know if the farm will ever be built.

It just so happens that on a clear day I can see the steam plumes from the stacks of the nuclear plant 25 miles West of me. I guess that’s where I’ll get my electricity until something better comes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringrepublican Donating Member (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #170
211. damn your header made me giggle. Needed a laugh thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #130
155. Well, wind turbines no longer harm birds
The blades were redesigned years ago to spin more slowly, allowing birds to see them more easily and avoid them.

Dams are a problem though for fish, with no real solution found so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #155
216. seems to me that dams is a necessary evil, without them we would
have many life threatening floods. I don't think they have a detrimental effect on the fish per sei. Sure the Sandie's, white bass cannot go up any further on their spawning runs but they are doing ok in the streams and tributaries to the lakes. Sure the spoonbill are stopped but then again they seem to be doing ok. If you have the water held back for flood control why not use the enormous potential for generating electricity. The blades on the wind generators are turning at such a slow speed they are of very little danger to the birds so why not use the potential energy to generate some electricity. With all good things comes some bad. Recognize it for what it is and work to correct it. I am not ready to give up my comforts of electricity or the freedoms of the automobile, sorry. I would like to see more mass transit though. I would love to go out here in a little bit and hop on a bus and go eat a big breakfast, do a little shopping and then come home all for a buck or so it would cost me in transportation.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #216
219. Dams have doomed many anadromous species of fish
Dams have doomed many anadromous species of fish such as
salmon, shad, and sturgeon.

The Atlantic salmon is the classical example on the east coast.

We're still struggling to find techniques to allow these fish
to both be able to travel upstream beyond the dams and for their
spawn to survive the ride downstream again without being turned
into pate' in the turbines.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Car batteries are highly recyclable.
Car batteries, even fancy high-tech hybrid car batteries,
are highly recyclable.

And the hybrids at least don't use lead-based batteries.
Nickel today, lithium tomorrow.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
115. eVionyx and zinc-air fuel cell batteries...? Stand alone or combined with
hybrid ICE tech ? The hydrogen fuel cell PEMs are based on a platinum catalyst; Zinc Air Fuel Cells are based upon potassium hydroxide catalyst and zinc oxide pellets. Platinum costs how much an oz. ? Zinc on the other hand costs only 50 cents a pound !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Don't these hybrid engines charge the battery during the gasoline phase?
I don't think they are ever actually "plugged in" to an eledtrical source. I may be wrong, but I thought while they are in the "gas" cylce that the battery is recharged then. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. That is what I understood as well nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. Yes, you just get gas every week or two, just like any other car.
It recharges from the engine, or from recovering energy that would be lost when you use the brakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. yes and no
some hybrid owners have rigged up power outlets in their garages so as to give the hybrid a full charge at night while it's parked. This results in them getting better mileage. And of course they use more home electricity, but I think I recall reading that the drain was fairly negligible.

So there's been somewhat of an outcry among hybrid owners for Honda and Toyota to make the cars "pluggable" straight from the factory. I believe Toyota, at least, is considering this.

I read most of this in Scientific American, fwiw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
179. yet the genius's at ford say, some american's will still buy big suv's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #179
253. For a while anyway......They'll come around in time or be out of
business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
54. Hybrids recharge by 'regenerative breaking'.
If you are driving a Prius and stuck in gridlock, your gasoline engine isn't running. The car moves at low speed by an electric motor and the battery. This is a great idea since a gasoline engine does its worst at slow speeds or idle. Once you get up to certain speed, I don't recall how fast, the gasoline phase takes over. I hear that the changeover is seemless.
The recharging takes place when you apply your brakes. When you engage your break, that kinetic energy is turned into electrical charge.
There is almost a certain beauty to the system.
Ford and GM STILL don't get it. They still have SUV tunnelvision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #54
74. If the gasoline engine were made to turn the generator itself,
There would be no gain in efficiency, just more equipment.

As for Ford and GM, they got it a decade ago. They just haven't gotten it to sell yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #74
168. There's still a gain in efficiency.
Gasoline engines have some (pretty arbitrary) speed at which
they are most efficient. In an ordinary, mechanical-drive car,
the engine turns at a wide range of speeds, only occasionally
operating at its most-efficient speed. In particular, when
you're idling, the engine is 0% efficient and when you're
accelerating heavily, the engine is doing pretty poorly as
well.

By comparison, hybrid (engine-generator-battery-electric
motor) technology allows the engine to spend far more
of iits time either operating at the speed that allows top
efficiency or the engine is shut off completely.

The big point is that the battery acts as an "accumulator
of energy", both allowing the engine to operate more
efficiently and recapturing the car's kinetic energy when
braking, energy that would otherwise be wasted as heat.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
106. They get it now. But they missed the boat.
Patents have taken over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
217. Yes and also as you decelerate. For an experiment check out the temp
of the brakes rotors/pads after a stop, careful though because they get real hot. Lots of wasted energy there, in fact you had to pay for the gasoline to make them that hot in an around about way. Batteries are all recycleable, or components therein are. Plug-in hybrids are the future, not fuel cells nor hydrogen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
53. You don't "plug in" the Prius.
It charges it's own batteries using the heat from braking and when needed the 1.5 liters engine in it. This engine only starts when needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
58. This has NO "plug in" battery... none of the Toyota or Honda models do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #58
207. I think the plug-in version of the Prius IS available in Europe, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
67. You're right, nothing is free.
The batteries are improving, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
135. Batteries are a small concern compared to CO2 emissions
and the Prius has the lowest emissions of any car on the market. Wht is this important? Watch this: http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_classics/aninconvenienttruth/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #135
144. The issue is that the emissions from batter production are important
Though they're in a different location. If more pollution is created overall in making the components, it isn't really a gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
118. Lithium Meta Hydride
The Prius uses LiMH batteries.

AFAIK, they are non-toxic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #118
151. Prius uses 12 modules of NiMH, Nickel Metal Hydride batteries
Widely available Lithium Ion batteries like those used in cell phones and laptops still have the fire issue, though technology is coming along to make them inert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #151
159. Ooops!
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 02:54 PM by longship
I meant Nickel Metal Hydride but my fingers typed "Lithium". Obviously I was thinking of the other battery technology "Lithium Ion" when I typed it.

Thanks for the correction. I'll attempt to correct it.

on edit: Apparently edit time has expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #159
200. No prob. :-)
Honda and Ford use D-Cells.... that's some old tech! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
134. You don't plug the Prius in; the gas engine charges the battery
there is a HUGE GOP/ Exxon/ Mobile disinformation campaign being waged against hybrids right now, so take some of what you read with a grain of salt.The Prius leaves a much smaller CO2 footprint than any other car on the market, making it THE vehicle for those who are concerned about the very real threat of climate change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
161. A hazmat nightmare, if wrecked...
If you look at hybrids from the First Responder / Volunteer Fireman perspective, they are quite scary. Nobody wants to get close to a wreck involving one of those - thousands of volts of electricity, leaking battery acid, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptolle Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #161
164. source
Do you please have a source for this assertion. I'd dearly love to see the raw data, basic research that underlies the statement.For a start I'd be hard-pressed to believe that Toyota didn't consider this in the design process. And as a poster above says there is an enormous disinfo campaign being run right now.I saw a poster at another discussion board I frequent make the claim that a hummer would use less total energy over its lifespan than a hybrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #161
167. Wrong! Emergency personnel are trained to work with these cars
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 04:07 PM by Beaverhausen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #161
169. Horseshit!
"Thousands of volts"...

"Leaking battery acid"...

Puh-lease! The battery pack is about 300 volts and has clear disconnection
directions. It contains *NO* acid. These "first responder" concerns are bogus
bullshit stirred up by people who don't want Japanese hybrids to be succesful.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
206. Yeah! 'Cause we all know that NOTHING toxic results from the production
and use of GASOLINE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. What is "Japan's standard fuel cycle" ?
The article says that by their standard, the current Prius gets 99 mpg.

"Honda is currently winning the hybrid image war in Japan with the tiny Insight coupe, which manages 102 mpg in Japan's standard fuel cycle. The Prius is just a whisker behind at 99 mpg (35 km/l). But now comes news that Toyota is determined to hit 40 km/l (113 mpg) with the next Prius."

This probably less revolutionary than it sounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "less revolutionary than it sounds" Yep
The technology has existed for a long time, they just didn't tell us about it. :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. so if we put one on order now
our number will be called about 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
114. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. One in metallic pearl , please.
Good on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hi, my name is Joe average
I have 2 kids, a Lab, oh and my wife is wheelchair bound. We want to drive to North Carolina and bring all of our luggage (5 average suitcases, a food cooler, and of course, the wheelchair).

Will your hybrid be sutable for our family?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Dear Joe,
Thank you for your inquiry. For a family of your size, we might suggest you review the specs on the Toyta Highlander Hybrid.
http://www.toyota.com/highlander/index.html?s_van=GM_TN_HYBRID_HIGHLANDER

Not quite 100MPG, but still better than the average SUV. Plus, you may qualify for a Federal Tax benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
44. Thank you for your immediate reply
But even with the $2600 Federal tax break, the Hybrid Highlander is still $6200 more than the standard Highlander, and only gets me appx. 4 MPG (estimated) highway miles better.


I will have to own the Hybrid many, many years before I see a cost advantage, and the repairs to Hybrids are beginning to prove more expensive than non-hybrid models.

I would like to thank you for that information, but I'm thinking about a steam powered ex-UPS truck now. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Hi, average Joe -- pack lighter and you'll be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. Wrong answer.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 09:52 AM by DainBramaged
I guess you didn't understand the part about the wheelchair and the dog.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. No, it's probably more a commuter car. Do you have more than
one car now? I have a Prius now, and it's great on trips. But for the most part, it is only 3 of us... If I had more passengers, a dog and a wheelchair to deal with on vacation, then I'd probably just rent a minivan or somesuch for a week or two. Or look into a Highlander hybrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. I said further down here it's a perfect commuter car
But you must realize my point. For the folks who are overwhelmed with smug because they own one, they are not the answer for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. overwhelmed with smug? nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. I guess you missed the episode of South Park about that.
Titled "Smug Alert!"

The make of the hybrid car is "Pious" which seems to indicate that the sanctimonious (smug) behavior of the hybrid owners is simply a metaphor for those who believe that they are a cut above others because of their religious beliefs.


http://www.tv.com/south-park/smug-alert!/episode/687553/summary.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Too funny. I haven't seen that show lately, but I'll try to catch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. I have absolutely no problem with hybrids, none
But until they match the price of non-hybrids, and out perform them by a substantial margin, they are not economically practical enough for me. I try to consolidate trips, not be frivolous about where I go, and hitch rides with friends. But I have to pick up three and four new PC's in boxes for clients quite often, and thy won't fit in a Pious.

PS,

South Park has retained it's bite, still fun to watch.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackadoo wabbit Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #51
222. Oh, I bet they'd fit.
You'd be amazed at what you can fit in a Prius.

Our local Ikea had a sale a few months ago, and we bought a dining room table, four chairs, an etagere, and a bunch of other stuff that I can't recall right now. We had two of those large trolleys worth of stuff by the time we were finished.

So anyway we roll our trolleys out to the loading area, and I go to get the Prius while my husband watches our trolleys. When I get back, I see that ours is the only car; everyone else has a monsterous SUV that they're loading. But we had bought at least as much stuff as anyone else. I'm sure people thought we were crazy, that we couldn't possibly fit all that stuff in our (comparatively) teeny, tiny Prius. (To be fair, my husband was a bit worried about this, too.) Well, we set to work loading, and everything fit like a charm. We even had enough room left over for a couple more chairs if we'd been so inclined.

As we drove off, our Prius comfortably but not overly full, I checked out some of the SUVs. Believe it or not, we actually had more room left in our car than many of their owners had in their gas-guzzling SUVs.

Viva la Prius!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #222
226. What a wonderful story, want to buy me one then? I can't afford one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #226
231. asdf
MSRP is a lil over 20K. waddya want it for, free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
66. Guilty as charged!
But I only feel smug when I watch an Escalade or Armada or Behemoth fill up at the gas pump.

Otherwise, I just drive....

Trying to do my own tiny little part to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #66
181. But an Armada is a beloved Import, blashpemy blasphemy
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
107. Why does it always have to be about YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #107
174. What do you care, who it's about, jealous?
You have a problem with my posts, pm me or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
109. I think the minivan is the *real* product that would benefit from a hybrid
drivetrain. Commuter cars are already rather economical as it is. Huge reductions in the rate of liters per mile will be achieved with the bigger vehicles. Black or yellow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
116. No, but Toyota sells two hybrid minivans in Japan
Hopefully we'll get one here in the US before too much longer. I can't imagine what the delay is, I imagine they'd sell very well.

Meanwhile, the Highlander hybrid would probably work nicely and unlike most SUVs it's very safe.

The Prius is really too small for my needs, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
136. The Hylander Hybrid should work for Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
147. wow
since when does your 'average joe' has a disabled wife?

i've got an idea, joe; make a car choice based on how you use a car for 95+% of your driving (commuting, shopping, groceries etc), not the occasional vacation. and when vacation comes, just rent a lousy minivan.

or you can get some behemoth of an SUV that you only use to its full potential like 3 times a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #147
156. LOL, perfect response
"when vacation comes, just rent a lousy minivan"

It seems that renting a vehicle for the rare occassions you need a larger one is completely impossible for some people.

When my girlfriend moved 85 miles to move into my apartment, I rented a cargo van from Hertz Rent-a-Car (the local U-Haul was out of moving vans, it was finals week on campus and everyone was moving). It cost ~$75 for a 24-hr, unlimited mileage rental, and I think I put in ~$25 in gas before I returned it. It took two round trips because it wasn't as big as the U-Haul we wanted, but it worked out well nontheless.

Renting a vehicle for moving large amounts of people and cargo a few times a year is an excellent option, and saves a lot of money compared to buying an SUV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #156
165. It's just an attempt to rationalize a decision..
which is based on desire rather than actual need.

My cousin just had to get an SUV with 4 wheel drive for the one weekend a year that she goes to my Grandpa's farm (which has no roads).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #147
175. It was an example, are you simply ignorant of all possibilities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #175
183. Shall we design all cars to fit all possibilities?
Rent a minivan for the hypothetical vacation you posted about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #183
185. We design cars AND trucks to fit all possibilities now
We took a train, boarded the dog. No one thought of Amtrak, not one of you. Silly Pious owners. Sell your cars and use mass transit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #185
215. asdf
i take mass transit practically everywhere i go. nobody brought up amtrak because we're talking about a choice of cars.

what i really like is how you make fun of prius owners for being snobs by acting like a total elitist. yeah, that's not hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #215
225. I don't care what you think, so there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #185
220. "Pious": do you really think you'll convince anyone by insulting them?
Just wondering.

Your style of argumentation seems very counter-productive to me.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #175
214. asdf
"are you simply ignorant of all possibilities?"

are you ignorant of what 'average' means?

you discount hybrid cars like the prius for the 'average joe'. when in fact, if 'average joes' would wake up and realize that a car like the prius is perfect for 95% or more of their driving, they'd realize that the real reason they don't want a car like that is because they've fallen hook, line and sinker for the tripe madison ave keeps spoonfeeding us about how you aren't a man if you don't drive a huge honkin' car.

yeah, there are people that need 4WD all the time. guess what, they aint your average joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #214
224. (Sigh) I stated in one of the earliest posts they are perfect
commuter cars. And as has been the case throughout this thread, those of you who so quickly defend the Pious never stop to think (as I said before) that so many of us here just can't afford one. And when GM releases either the Saturn Vue green or hybrid Malibu (as I said before) I would try to one day afford one of them since I do not wish to buy a Japanese hybrid but a Domestic one.

With that I leave most of you with this,

Happy Egg and Candy made up HoliDay



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #224
228. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #228
230. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #230
232. asdf
don't get all pissy at me cause you got called on a disingenuous argument. your entire line of argument here has been to insult prius owners as some kind of elitists who are telling people to get a lavish vehicle that noone can afford (yeah, $21K is *really* expensive for a new car these days, what's the average new car price, like $27-28K?)and making up stuff to try to fit that viewpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #232
235. BTW
what i especially like is how you're sending me nasty private messages, but don't allow any responses. nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #235
238. He's done the same thing to me. I assume he does it frequently.
And it is flat-out, yellow-dog cowardly.

NOBODY in this thread was 1. insisting that EVERYBODY should by a hybrid, or 2. being elitist if they happen to own one. Most of the comments were either, "hey, that's cool" or "I love mine!"

The dude SERIOUSLY needs to get over himself.

But I especially love the spineless little trick of sending a nasty PM and then blocking a response. Fucking coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just bought a Prius...
And I'm NOT getting the stated 51-60 mpg. Love the car and I know it's the best one out there for mpg's but what am I doing wrong here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Nothing, they lied.
"These figures may not reflect your driving cycle or individual situation.

When the new Fed standards for actual millage come out next year, you'll see about a 20% drop in the numbers on the window stickers. And if you have more than one person in the car, your millage may vary. And if you don't accelerate like a snail from stoplights or onto the highway, your millage may vary. And if you live in a hilly, mountainous or cold area where you have to warm up the car in the morning, your millage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thank's..
I thought is was something like that--I still know I'm getting better mpg's than all the christian fascist bastard's with Bush04 stickers in SUV's that surround me here in suburban Atlanta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Hybrids are perfect commuter cars, perfect for one or 2 people
And that is why they are typically small. The new breed of larger hybrids aren't worth the premium you have to pay over the standard non-hybrid models. And Ford is introducing incentives to move their Escape hybrids off the lots. No one seems to want them in numbers large enough to support them.


http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B901C8C41%2D0F5C%2D412E%2DAFA9%2DC50D4EFAA454%7D&dist=newsfinder&siteid=google&keyword=&print=true&dist=printTop


Nissan CEO says unsurprised about hybrid-vehicle market issues

>In a roundtable with reporters here at the New York International Auto Show, Ghosn - who also runs Nissan affiliate Renault SA (13190.FR) - said he "was the only guy" to question the move of some auto makers in recent years taking a headlong dive into the hybrid vehicle market. "I have some kind of satisfaction in being a little bit right on this one."

Ghosn, known for his ability to execute a convincing turnaround at the once-ailing Japanese car maker, said he has been saying for years that auto makers need to be cautious in gauging the hybrid vehicle market and insists that much of the media just looked at him like he was "retarded."

Earlier in April, Ford Motor Co. (F) began offering generous 0% financing incentives on hybrid SUVs. Also, Toyota Motor Corp. (TM) has scaled back some hybrid production in Japan due to weaker-than-expected demand.

Hybrids, which run on a combination of conventional engine power and batteries, appeared on the U.S. scene in the late 1990s and began picking up steam in 2003 and 2004 when Toyota and Ford began touting bigger, more functional editions of the alternative vehicles. Hybrids are celebrated for better-than-conventional fuel economy, but "people pay so much money" over a traditional car to buy a hybrid that it clouds the business case for making the vehicles, Ghosn said. <
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
61. As commuter cars, they are perfect for four people
Several I know who own them carpool together... and the four fit very comfortable... I've ridden with them a time or two, and again it's fine. And, this is for a 50 mile trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #61
80. (Sigh) Do any of you ever stop to think about those who
can't afford to buy one? Does it make sense that the world isn't always about new cars and expensive insurance to save a few miles per gallon. Survival is important to so many on DU, paycheck to paycheck is how many of us live, and many of you smug Pious owners will never get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #80
157. There are plenty of cheap non-hybrids that do well gas-wise
I drive my friends around in my Scion xA a lot, and we have no problem fitting 4 people in it comfortably.

City, 27-29 mpg average over 10,000 miles so far. Highway, 36 mpg at 70-75 mph, 45 mpg at 55-60 mph.

Cost? They start at $13,000 new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #157
172. I already spoke about that
Why do Hybrid owners think they're better than the rest of us? The attitude in this thread is "we own hybrids, you don't, so you suck" no matter what a person's financial situation is.

How much like Freepers you all sound. You condemn them for driving (and always a broad sweeping generalization) gas guzzling SUV's, yet you all think you're dog's gift because you get better millage.

Tell ya what Pious owners, buy me a hybrid so I can be as smug as you all.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
189. lol....Ghosn is a self-serving scumbag
i'd expect him to bash hybrids since Nissan isn't making any, and he's been getting squeezed by the Honda/Toyota sales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #189
227. I think since he runs some pretty large car companies
And pulled Nissan out of the swamp, he is a little smarter than you or I. And I didn't read it as bashing hybrids, sorry that you did.

By the way, do you know what percentage of market share hybrid sales are. Automotive News lists the sales figures for all manufacturers every week on the last couple of pages.

1% last year, and they won't exceed that figure this year either. So much for that. When they become $12,000 cars instead of bloated cash cows for the wonder Japanese who are our trading partners and care about us (I laugh I made a funny), then you'll sell a million a year. Until then, oh well.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #227
234. for starters
someone can be much smarter than you or I and have a lot of power while still being a lowlife tool (i.e., Cheney)...and Ghosn will be changing his tune once Nissan finally gets their green cars out to the market--as you know, they were in bad shape financially, so there was no cash for R+D (if there was at the time, Nissan would already have their products out, imo...

$12,000? Nice to know you set the market price instead of the automaker...I think the Chevrolet Corvette is the finest car made in the USA today, and in a good year, they may make 30,000-35,000 units, which is a fraction of the 1% market share--CERTAINLY the Corvette and the public would be better served if it sold for $5,000 instead of $45,000, right? Just because you'd only pay $12,000 for it doesn't mean the rest of the buying public would...The bottom line is that those that want one can get one, and those that want to drive something else can do so as well...

Yes, they are more expensive now, but like ALL automotive technologies, the more widespread it becomes, the cheaper it will be relatively in the long run...Just like EFI, independent rear suspensions, 4-wheel disc brakes, traction/stability control, nav,the list goes on...

and believe it or not, hybrids are not the be-all end-all, and there are several technologies in various stages of development now...Some automakers are banking on next generation clean diesels (especially in Europe) while other automakers are looking at full-electric cars....we'll see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #234
245. Here we go
someone can be much smarter than you or I and have a lot of power while still being a lowlife tool (i.e., Cheney)...and Ghosn will be changing his tune once Nissan finally gets their green cars out to the market--as you know, they were in bad shape financially, so there was no cash for R+D (if there was at the time, Nissan would already have their products out, imo...


IMO means nothing. Ghosn still controls one of the largest car conglomerates in the world and we're debating on a blog. I think he's a bit more qualified to decide his corporations' future, not you or I.

$12,000? Nice to know you set the market price instead of the automaker...I think the Chevrolet Corvette is the finest car made in the USA today, and in a good year, they may make 30,000-35,000 units, which is a fraction of the 1% market share--CERTAINLY the Corvette and the public would be better served if it sold for $5,000 instead of $45,000, right? Just because you'd only pay $12,000 for it doesn't mean the rest of the buying public would...The bottom line is that those that want one can get one, and those that want to drive something else can do so as well...


I didn't set anything, your assumption is sillier than your opinion of he Corvette. My opinion was $12,000 would be a wonderful starting point for a hybrid, but of course you're smarter than Ghosn or myself. I especially enjoyed this sentence; The bottom line is that those that want one can get one, and those that want to drive something else can do so as well... I've been saying that for 24 hours, but since you're smarter than me, I though you would have read the entire thread.

Yes, they are more expensive now, but like ALL automotive technologies, the more widespread it becomes, the cheaper it will be relatively in the long run...Just like EFI, independent rear suspensions, 4-wheel disc brakes, traction/stability control, nav,the list goes on...


Thank you for that insight, demand always speeds up amortization and increases efficiency, lowering the price to the consumer while maintaining the same profit percentage (not necessary volume) as in the early stages of a product run out.

and believe it or not, hybrids are not the be-all end-all, and there are several technologies in various stages of development now...Some automakers are banking on next generation clean diesels (especially in Europe) while other automakers are looking at full-electric cars....we'll see what happens.


I spoke yesterday of the EV1, and of the fact that convenient diesel and ethanol stations were lacking, pushing back demand for the diesel which sell so well in Europe. But I also mentioned how horrible our mass transit systems has become (or never was) because previous generations never believed the oil would run out. If Venezuela gets it's way, One trillion bbls. (estimate) of heavy crude may extend the petro beast's life long after I'm dead and buried.

Good day, have a nice weekend, and thanks for your insight. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #245
246. glad you liked it
hope you had as much fun writing the response as i did writing the post!

later:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #246
247. I have a headache too, be well
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
117. That's a bit harsh.

They didn't "lie" so much as those are the numbers they were forced to put on the sticker by the legal standards. They have, for the duration, made it clear that they don't like that fact, because they don't like it when customers feel like they didn't get what was advertised.

Now the individual car salesman may have omitted that conveniently, which would be a lie, but the company as a whole wants that as transparent as possible.

As far as one of your later posts, I do indeed think about people who cannot afford them. I often complain online about how hybrids are being sold with luxury options mandatory, and how Toyota really needs to do a stripped-down no-frills corolla hybrid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #117
124. Thank you for reading my posts
Having auto dealers for clients, they and the manufacturers, just like the Bush misAdministration, lie, only their version is twisting the truth to fit the situation.

If they wanted to they could put anything they wanted on the sticker as long as they run the required EPA test. They could easily do a Car & Driver real millage test run and put it on the sticker too.

They don't because they lie. And they could squeeze 5 to 10 more miles per gallon if they cut the weight 500 lbs and horsepower by 25. They lie and say they can't. They lie because it's all about profit and the shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
143. I know plenty of Prius owners who average 50-65 mpg
they didn't lie. The Prius gets very high MPGs in the warmer months and lower MPGs in the cooler months-it's the average over the year.

To Prius owners it's not just about gas mileage, it's about CO2 emissions. Prius has the lowest emissions of any car on the road. Why does this matter? Watch this: http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_classics/aninconvenienttruth/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #143
163. Exactly, the issue is people need to change they way they drive...
If you drive a hybrid like it was a gas only car, you will get lower than the posted mileage.

However, if you apply some simple things in your driving habits you can get well beyond the stated MPG amounts.

I recently read an article about people getting upwards of 100 mpg in a Prius. It can be done, but you know, we are Americans and no one can tell us how to drive, you know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. I get in the mid 50's. Until it had a few thousand miles on it, I
could never get about high 40's. I can do even better if I really pay attention to the displays, but I tend to just get in it and drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #36
56. And the point should be just get in and drive
Why does driving have to be a contest to see if you can gain that extra one or two more miles per gallon better every time you start the car? Why can't we just get in, get 50MPG average combined millage, and be happy we've made a smaller footprint?

Toyota has cut back production estimates for hybrid production in Japan too. And then just a few minutes ago it hit me. Motorcycles. No one talks about riding motorcycles to save gas. Why even drive a car (even like the Pious) when you can ride a bike to work? Bikes between 250cc and 1,200cc will get anywhere between 45-70 mpg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #56
63. Driving your GAS car correctly, ie not wastefully, will increase your
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 10:34 AM by LostinVA
mpg quite a bit, too. There are just many people who don't want to do that. You can't just get into any car when gas is almost $3 a gallon and just drive. It has nothing at all to do with hybrids, etc. Just wasteful driving habits.

on edit: motorcycles. Because they are not practical for most people. You talk about they not being any room in a Prius??? Bikes have zero room. Can't take your kids to school, can't drive it if you live in very cold weather, have to wear a skirt, etc. Not practical.

And, you are starting to sound like you have a problem with hybrids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #63
75. See post #51
And your explanation of why motorcycles are impractical is my point about hybrids. Put your kids in a sidecar. Wear extra clothes in winter, ice spikes on the tires. Add saddle bags for storage. As with the explanations from those who think hybrids are for everyone, I can come right back with a reason you should be on a motorcycle.

Until you want that new refrigerator delivered to your house. Then you're in trouble. The aerodynamics go to hell on a Pious with it tied to the roof. And you can only do one at a time and have to go back to get another. What a waste of gas.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #75
158. Most places deliver large appliances for a small fee
Such as refridgerators :eyes:

Is it hard coming up with so many excuse NOT to drive a fuel-efficient vehicle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #158
173. You missed the point completely
Should all of us wear sack cloth and beat ourselves bloody because we don't own a hybrid? This is America, I'll drive what I can afford and for those of you who think imported hybrids are better than anything else made, fine, form a smug club so you can pat yourselves on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #173
182. I'll be happy to join the "Smug Club" when that new version
of the "Pious" comes out. I got a 76 Vega you can have for cheap.. hell, I'll give it to you. and a few extra engine blocks (you'll need one about every 60,000 miles). just think, a free American made car... then you can form a "Born Loser" club and cram your "average Joe" family into it for a nice sunday drive..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #182
184. Stop, you know as well as I do that sore loser
belongs on your head for bringing up a mistake from 30 years ago, and it is a fine way to punish the workers and engineers of today.

And speaking of joining, join my ignore club, It's more fun to watch the words "ignore" come up when ever you respond to one of my posts. And it's fun guessing if it's you or someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #173
186. Well, when Peak Oil puts gas to $10/gallon
I suspect a lot of people will be wearing sack cloth, along with hand-me-down clothes and shoes.

YOU seem to miss the point that if we don't start making MAJOR sacrifices NOW voluntarily, we will be forced to make even more painful sacrifices a few years from now.

Yes, it's a sacrifice to have to drive a smaller, slower car in order to get better gas mileage. But it saves gas, which buys us time to come up with alternative fuel sources when we go over the Peak. And from the current news reports, it appears we are either on the Peak now, or will be in only a few years time.

I honestly don't care if people drive hybrids, ride bikes, ride trains, drive small Toyotas, Hondas and Scions, or walk to work. So long as they reduce their oil consumption, I'm happy. I don't want to be smug, and I don't want to pat myself on the back. I want to help find a way to prevent the catastrophe that will befall this planet in the next few decades as Peak Oil hits, climate change becomes more severe, and food production falls short of demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #186
187. And I'll bring this last point up again before I go to bed
Until we control the Congress again, NOTHING we hope for is going to get done. Nothing. And the money you spent buying a hybrid is going overseas, not home to help our gross domestic product. Just our trade imbalance.

Good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #56
95. I do get in and just drive. 53 MPG. If I really work at it, I can hit
58 ~ 60MPG. And by working at it, I mean not zooming up to red lights, keeping foot out of it, etc. And thats with the AC on, and going 75~80 on I-540, weather and NCHP permitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #95
199. By driving for increased gas mileage, you're driving safer
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 08:07 PM by Nobody
When you don't come to sudden stops, you get maximum battery charge time, and you're still moving and adding to MPG. The people behind you don't have to slam on their own brakes either. You're also increasing the life of your brakes by coasting to a stop instead of zooming to those red lights and slamming on the brakes.

One of the original Prius test drivers for (I forget the magazine, sorry, or I'd insert the link) was able to keep the Prius on electric while going 40 mpg. He accelerated slowly so the gas engine didn't kick in, and he was on a street without much traffic. Don't do this when there are impatient drivers behind you, he wanted to see how fast he could go on solely electric and was pleasantly surprised to get 40.

(on edit: oops, meant to say one thing, ended up saying the opposite with a misplaced word. Fixed it, now I'm saying what I mean)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
59. I know eight person who own a Prius, and they ALL get at least
the 51-60... two get higher than that. So, Toyota didn't lie.

Heck, my VW Golf TDI gets 50 mpg, which is ABOVE the listed mpg... you just have to know how to drive it... and the Prius. Coasting, no jack rabbit starts, no driving at speed demon speeds, etc. It literally all adds up. Just going the speed limit on the interstate gives me above mpg... as soon as I add 5mph or so on, the mileage goes down. We just have to relearn how best to drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #59
78. It must be scary going 55 when the world is going 75+
on the interstates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #78
91. It's not scary at all

I drive conventional gas powered vehicles and usually drive a little over 55, not really for any reason just noticed that is what I drive when I don't watch the speedometer. As far as the other drivers, not really any of my concern or any of my business what speed they are driving and I am within the minimum and maxim speeds allowed by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #78
133. That sounds a bit sour grapish. I was doing 80+ this morning, and
my Prius probably sees at least 75 mph (65 mph highway) every day, and I get 53MPG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #133
176. No, I hate being looked upon as a bad guy for not owning a hybrid
And I JUST had an incident on the way home when a Pious was in the fast lane on RT10 in Morris county NJ and would not move over. 45 in a 55 zone. Slow down traffic so they could prove a point or get 2 more miles per gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #176
188. 45 in a 55 maximum zone is within the law

You do not have to drive the maximum speed allowed and no one has a right to expect others to drive the maximum speed allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #188
201. Automobiles are about passion, and passion is my life
From my passion for cars, my passion for politics, passion for my family, to my passion for abandoned and abused animals, passion makes my life interesting and worthwhile. I have maybe, tops, 25 years left, and I want to stay passionate till it's time for that dirt nap.

When the passion is gone, for some, all that matters is not breaking the law and staying within the speed limit.

Sad.

FYI, Saturn releases a Green Vue end of the year. Along with a 260HP turbo convertible. Something for everyone.

Passion. It is what makes it worth while. And it is what I hope wins back Washington for us this November.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/automobiles/autospecial/13motors.html

The vice chairman of General Motors, Robert A. Lutz, yesterday offered the company's bluntest rebuff yet of critics who say a turnaround at the ailing automaker is failing to gain steam.

Yesterday, that same off-the-cuff demeanor was again on display. Few G.M. skeptics were spared. Mr. Lutz took issue with a statement by President Bush earlier this year that G.M. "needs to develop a product that's relevant." Responded Mr. Lutz: "I'm a lifelong Republican, by the way. But next time around, Hillary, here I come. I'm a protest vote."

He also took issue with people who, he said, were indifferent to the American automakers' loss of market share to Asian companies. "People who think it doesn't matter who owns our automobile industry are flat wrong," he said, adding that it was "fiction" that foreign automakers were becoming more American as they build plants here. "They are not producing. For the most part, they are assembling. The parts mostly come from overseas. The profits are partially invested in the United States but not necessarily."


Back to sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #201
202. nothing sad about my driving

I just don't care what speed other cars are driving, I don't drive slower than the speed limit to save gas. One of my vehicles gets about 14mpg on the highway so driving slower isn't going to make much difference. I guess I just don't share your passion for cars. I can see them and think they look nice and all but don't see what the speed you are driving at has to do with passion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #201
208. Automobiles are about getting from Point A to Point B.
"Automobiles are about passion." LMAO. Sounds like those car commercials really work. Kudos to the auto companies who were advertising when you were 10-14 years old!

It really pisses me off when some "passionate" driver endangers my life on the highway.

Maybe find some other source of passion in your life than from driving a car on a public highway.

Mario Andretti did a commercial in which he made fun of highway drivers who find highway driving "passionate." He said take it to the track and be safe on the public highways.

Take your passion to the dirt track, Mr. Passionate.















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #208
210. Passion is what has kept the Cons in power for 12 years
Edited on Fri Apr-14-06 04:22 AM by DainBramaged
I guess you didn't read my entire post. I'm glad you think I endanger other's lives. Especially yours. I call that paranoia, not passion. And if you misunderstood the meaning of passion, I'm sure your life is full of misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #176
194. You're not a bad guy for driving a conventional engine car
Any vehicle gets better gas mileage when you reduce wind resistance, do less idling at stops, keep to a constant speed, etc. I can squeeze some impressive gas mileage out of my Insight on a good day with a good tailwind (my record is 86mpg) but in the dead of winter, when the engine needs to run rich, when warming up takes a while, when it's 20 below zero air temperature, and facing a headwind, I still got better than 50 mpg.

It's the same for any vehicle.

Check the Ford UK web site. There are cars they sell in the UK that they do not sell here that are clean-running diesel engines giving better mpg than anything they sell here. Their own execs are closing down two auto manufacturing plants that are dedicated to larger vehicles that aren't selling so well. When you do the conversion for mpg and Imperial gallons (5 qts rather than the US 4 qts to a gallon) and kilograms, the Ford UK vehicles get better fuel economy.

Why don't they sell those cars here? Because they think no one will buy them. Maybe they're right, but do you think they should be offered?

I would like to see some serious research into clean-running renewable fuel so we don't run ourselves out of fuel before we can deal with it. Too many people don't care. I'd like to see an easily manufactured renewable fuel such as methanol (many farms run on this, don't know that you can use it in vehicles), ethanol, biodiesels, fuel cells, water (has been tried), or something else not thought of yet. If within a few years there is something out there that can carry a lot of passengers, haul a lot of stuff, and take on rough road conditions, and still get better gas mileage than what I normally get when I don't think about it (mid 70s), I'll be happy to hand over the hypermilage crown to someone else.

In fifteen years I do NOT want to be driving the most fuel economical car on the road. I want the standard to be raised.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #176
195. If it weren't a Prius, you would assume it was just a bad driver. So why..
can't you assume it's a bad driver ... IN A PRIUS??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #176
239. Show me ONE POST on this thread where somebody said that.
One. Just one. C'mon, show me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #133
190. I did 80+ this morning, too
And that's MPG, not MPH.

(By the way, I was keeping up with traffic just fine.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
146. The "Car talk" guys on PBS will back you up on that
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
64. what do other cars of similar size and price get?
20? 25? mpg? Even if you are getting 40mpg you are ahead of the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalPowered Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
79. Have you tried to pulse and glide?
It took me some time but I've got it figured out now and I'm starting to see the averages estimated. There's some good guides on pulse/glide on priuschat.com. If it makes you feel any better, I know you can actually do a lot better than EPA estimates in some instances. I drove 500 miles last weekend with a 20 mph tail wind and averaged almost 70 mpg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #79
131. WOW. I could've gone back to Kansas long ago!
here's a link I found that explains it quite well:

http://hybridcars.about.com/od/ownership/a/pulseandglide.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
129. I get about 45-50.
but I do alot of freeway driving, so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
137. May be your driving style, or the weather
my best friend has a Prius that gets 60-100 mpg in the summer on long road trips, but only about 45 in the winter. It's taken him a while to learn how to drive it to conserve the most amount of gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #137
160. Yep
I was getting 28 MPG during a snow storm here. It has a lot to do with driving style and conditions. Check out www.priuschat.com for good info on optimal driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #137
197. Weather makes a huge difference
I've got a friend with a Saturn EPA rated in the low 40s. He's been averaging about 30 mpg per tank in January. (this is Minnesota by the way) and pushing 50 mpg in the summer.

Another friend has a Prius but she drives like a maniac and gets about 45 mpg. I have no data for January so I can't say what she's getting.

My Insight has been getting in the high 50s in January, in the summer I can get high 70s and 80s. Record is 86 mpg. The Insight owners community has a 100 club. If you can do a trip and park the car with 100+ mpg on the trip odometer, you're a member. I haven't been able to get there yet, but the car is less than a year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEOBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Welcome, but overdue. If engine development had been allowed to evolve...
...Like computers, VCRs, televisions and virtually any other form of technology since it's inception, we'd probably have engines that get 1,000 to 1,500 MPG by now. Odd that no one is baffled that the combustible engine remains virtually unchanged in operational efficiency since the 1930s.

Try not to rack your brain too hard thinking about who had a vested interest in keeping it this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Do you think the manufacturers are innocent too?
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 03:26 AM by DainBramaged
Or do you also think that because we don't have the greatest mass transit system in the world, a poor number of stations selling diesel in the suburbs, and the late start on ethanol, and then take corrupt politicians into the mix, we're screwed and we'll gladly lap up what they throw at us?

On edit;

Remember the promise of the rotary? What happened? Anybody? Can I see hands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Physics gets in the way.
> If engine development had been allowed to evolve
> like computers, VCRs, televisions and virtually
> any other form of technology since it's inception,
> we'd probably have engines that get 1,000 to 1,500
> MPG by now.

Physics gets in the way. It takes a certain amount of
energy to push an object through the air at a certain
speed, and modern cars are starting to bump the limit.
You can streamline a practically-shaped car just so
much.

To get beyond that, you need to either:

o Travel a lot slower,
o Travle in cars with a smaller frontal cross-section, or
o Figure out a way for cars to travel in a vacuum

Or, most likely, quit traveling in personal automobiles.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
166. pioneering ideas...
Have been ignored consistently in the automotive genre... many rumours abound about technologies that have been silenced by copyright/patent sabotage. Here's one innovation that's been in the news recently... we'll see if it becomes something...

http://valleyadvocate.com/gbase/News/content.html?oid=oid:146677

Personally, i've never had a license to drive (34 now)... i'm too poor to afford a car so i mostly bus, bike, walk or hitch... unlike the other poster, I don't have anything against hybrids though... i'll take a ride if you can squeeze me in...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #166
218. I think you may be missing my point.
Ultimately, it isn't a question of some new idea offering
improved efficiency.

A gallon of gas only contains so much stored chemical energy.
(Diesel contains a little more and CNG or hydrogen a lot less.)

A heat engine (like the motor in your car, like *ANY* fuel-
burning engine) can only achieve a certain maximum efficiency
if it burns the fuel at temperature H and uses cooling air at
temperature C.

So there's only so much mechanical energy you can get out of
the chemical energy stored in a gallon of gas (or any chemical
fuel).

Meanwhile, it takes a certain amount of mechanical energy to
push a car through the atmosphere at a certain speed. You can
streamline the car, you can make its cross-sectional area
less (by seating everyone in a line instead of side-by-side),
you can cover it with some magical anti-friction shark-skin
derived surface coating and you'll get improvements, but it
still takes *SOME* energy and for any given speed, you can
calculate the air resistance R.

So at speed S, with the gas being burned by an engine at
temperature H and running in air at temperature C, with
an air resistance of R, you will only get so many miles
per gallon. It's all physics, and its immutable.

You might be able to blame it all on the Intelligent
Designer, but you can't blame it on Ford, GM, Exxon,
or Chevron.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #218
221. whoah there...
seems like you're missing my point too... of course it takes "some" energy to power a car, but if we all got 250 mpg instead of 25, wouldn't things be better?

And did you even read the article? As far as Physics being immutable, tell that to my yogic friend who spends time Out of Body (astral projection) every night. NOTHING is impossible or "immutable"... we limit ourselves by imposing limits. You list all these "if this is A and that's B" situations... but these are VARIABLES, not immutables.

As far as the article i posted is concerned... we are talking about 1 mechanical modification that can potentially double the gas mileage IN ALL VEHICLES, all by redesigning 1 component. How many other new ideas out there have been stifled?

As far as blaming our low gas mileage on the car companies, i sure as hell CAN blame it on them... we've already had cars that get 60 mpg without any hybrid or special technologies. Had their research been focused on the environmental aspects of car design as opposed to the "aesthetic" and/or saleable aspects of US car culture (why so many SUV's?), we would not be having this "discussion".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #221
223. Okay, you're one of those folks.
Have a happy life.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #223
236. Excellent response!...
Contrary to popular belief, "anything" is not possible.

:toast:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bye bye GM, Ford and Chrysler
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 04:04 AM by LiberalPartisan
Unless of course they can produce an oversized road hogging SUV with comparable mileage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. I'll still buy Fords - they're much prettier than any of those ugly
hybrids. Plus, I can't AFFORD a hybrid. No way I'm shelling out that kind of money for a butt-ugly car.

If car manufacturers want us to purchase these cars, they're going to have to price them better and make them more visually appealing to those of us who think foreign-designed automobiles are ugly a sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #29
62. a Prius sells in the mid 20s
Isnt that what most cars sell for? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #62
81. No
I can buy a myriad number of models under $15,000 that get in the 30MPG range. And there are great values in used older gas queens that make more sense than a new Pious or other hybrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. can we leave out used cars from the comparison
I can buy a 1994 Ford Taurus for $3000 and be way ahead of the game.

But this discussion applies to new cars. So you are saying that $15k cars compare to the Prius? Is the Prius a barebones economy car or a normal car? Are we talking comparible to a Civic or Accord?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #85
87. No we can't leave used cars out
It all depends on the economic status of the individual, period. If I can buy a used 6 year old Civic that gets 35 MPG for $5000, why should I buy a $23,000 Pious to get 15MPG more? What if I can't afford a new car payment? This is about ECONOMICS and the value to everyone, not just those fortunate enough to afford a new hybrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #87
89. no, its about NEW cars
Because manufacturers cannot build used cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #89
97. No, used cars were once new cars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #97
99. but this is a discussion on cars being made by manufacturers
Or so I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #99
101. I'm not trying to be cute, it's about economics
If I can afford to spend $250 a month on a car, there are few choices I can make for a new car. $250 a month gets me a $12-18,000 vehicle new, nowhere near a hybrid. But $250 a month over 36 months gets me a nice older Import or Domestic. And I can come close to hybrid millage without the depreciation penalty too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #101
103. im with you on the economics of it
I drive a 12 year old vehicle. I have no car payments. I just thought this discussion was about what Manufacturers are building and what they should try to build.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #103
104. I own an eight year old piece of shit for my driver
It gets 18mpg. I can't afford a new car. I've rebuild or replaced everything on my piece of shit in the past 2 years. It works, blows cold, carries 5 with a lot of storage space, and is 4wd. If I could afford $250 a month, I'd buy the most I could for my money. In 3 months, I have to get a car for my daughter. There goes my $4000 I saved up so I can buy her something safe and reliable. Maybe an older Cavalier, or even a Nissan Sentra or Mazda 323.

But I can't afford a new car for me.

Something too many here just don't want to understand. Yet they won't give me a dime to save oil and buy me a new hybrid but think preaching to me is ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #104
110. well i was thinking along the lines that this was discussing new cars
Like I said Im with you on the economics of used cars. For around $4,000, try getting an early/mid 90s Lumina or Cutlass Ciera. Those things seem to run forever. And the great thing about used GM cars are that parts are so damn cheap. I personally drive a 94 S10 blazer. Just replaced the fenders and plan to keep it for a few more years. I dont have a long commute so gas prices dont kill.

Keep in mind that lots of people do buy new cars and do not have a clue how to fix them and need warranties. They also are commuters alone and sit in traffic jams for hours on end. Hybrids make sense for those folks.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #110
119. I';m catching reports that Hybrid repairs are going to hurt
once those cars are out of warranty. And because of Federal regulations, soon, there won't be anything you can do yourself to a new car. You'll HAVE to go back to the dealer to maintain EPA compliance. Mine is a '98 Blazer. Bought it off lease in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #104
240. an older Cavalier???
aaahahahaha... boy, you really know your cars dont you. No wonder you bought an 8 year old piece of crap that gets 18, spews pollution, then rebuilt and replaced everything on it over the last two years. Smart thinking there.. Guys like you are a riot.. know-it-alls that deep down realize what born losers they truly are..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #240
251. I had a 2001 Chevy Cavalier
I regularly got around 30 mpg, but I did mostly highway with a little city.

I traded it in for an 06 Beetle TDI, because the diesel gets better mileage. Also the Cavalier has 93K miles on it, and I pretty much figured once it hit 100K it was just going to explode with a ton of problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #81
162. Buying used is greener anyway
By buying used you avoid the energy cost of producing a new car for you. An older car doing 30 mpg is a more environmentally friendly choice than a new hybrid, unless your sole green criteria is fuel consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #162
177. You hit it on the head, such a simple concept so few understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #162
193. An older car is probably spewing far more emissions into the atmosphere
than a newer one. My old car barely passed the "smog test" the last time I had to have it tested and I felt guilty about what I was putting into the air. Now with the Prius I know my emission are very low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #193
203. That's true
Newer cars also have much more ssafety features. However, a 3-year old off-lease car still counts in terms of production energy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #81
196. yes, but most of those (if not all) do not come with standard Air Bags...
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 07:53 PM by jsamuel
anti-lock breaks, air conditioning, automatic transmission, power stearing... and to add each of those things costs 1000 more dollars. so a "13-14000" dollar car ends up costing 17-18,000 dollars with minimal safety and comfort options. While with the Prius it comes standard with those features as well as a myriad of others. I have looked for cheap cars (I can't afford a Prius either) but I am not going to pay 18000 dollars for a piece of crap car when I can pay 23,000 for a great car with low gas mileage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
94. The Honda hybrids look just like the rest of their line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
113. Dont sound so happy ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. "God bless America, land that I love"...wait...huh? Whaddaya mean?
You mean the best fuel economy cars are being engineered and built by Japanese companies?

But America's the largest consumer of fossil fuels on the planet! And we're America, after all. Why couldn't WE come up with that?

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Ford has a hybrid.
Do you people read?

And, it looks more like a car than a bubble. Granted, I don't like SUVs, either, but the Ford Escape Hybrid at least LOOKS like a car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Not at a 100mpg. Do you read? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
90. Four things:
There's a unit coversion. 100 mpg there = 94 to us.

That's an empty car, driven by an expert. Real people on real roads in real traffic with real cargo won't get that kind of mileage.

The Escape is fully hybrid.

The Escape is much larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #90
132. Hybrid Ford Escape at 36/31 mpg doesn't compare to even 94 mpg...
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 01:20 PM by Hobarticus
And I'm sure Ford's specs are derived from the very same conditions you describe.

And if I don't WANT an SUV, this is a logical choice.

What's the big deal? I'm disappointed that our own Big Three couldn't have come up with this themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. Ford is busy committing corporate suicide
Their hybrid was a day late and a dollar short? And they're STILL idiots, given that in these very pages this morning, I read about a Ford exec still singing the praises of large SUV's.

I'm sorry you think it's an ugly car. I sometimes find beauty in functionality. But if you're in love with the Galaxy 500 look, well, what can I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #32
73. No need to be insulting, and Ford has a wannabe hybrid
Its mpg isn't that great, and US auto companies are busy cranking out gas guzzlers left and right, NOT studying and developing hybrids, hydrogen cars, etc. They don't car. Their hybrid is a PR thing.

Who acres what the car looks like? I can truly understand if you want a roadster, etc.... but just to get from place to place? A good, reliable car with good mpg is all we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. i thought the Escape gets 30mpg city?
Dont most SUVs get around 15 city?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #73
108. I'll ask you one last question, since you appear to know
everything there is to know about GM and the US auto manufacturers and what they research and how they market their products.

If everyone wanted a hybrid (or in your way of thinking, SHOULD buy one), why are there so amy other vehicles to buy?

Goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #73
141. Wow, lotsa hate n' discontent here, eh?
Amazing, just merely expecting better from the Big Three is enough to get some people's floormats in a twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #32
111. If i remember correctly Ford liscensed the hybrid tech from Toyota
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. We would have.
We just couldn't come up with the right Supreme Court when they sold out our vote for the real president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaydog Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. Prius gas mileage
I have a 2005 Prius. It gets ~ 44-45 MPG average. MPG is a little less in cold weather. I love the car (dependable,enough pep and handles very well)but it doesn't get the promised MPG. It does have a smaller gas tank so when i fill up it isn't crazy expensive. It does not plug in, but recharges the battery while the gas engine is running.

I highly recommend. I feel like I am supporting the technology, which is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Too bad it will still be ugly as sin.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 08:48 AM by Clark2008
I don't WANT to drive a bubble.

When are we going to get some hybrid sports cars?

PS. Not only do I find the Prius visually unappealling, it's also not safe for me to drive where I live. Interstates 40 and 75 meet in my town and most commuters here have to take the interstate to travel through town, as a result. A itty-bitty bubble like the Prius wouldn't stand a iota of a chance against the semi's I have to fight in traffic, daily. Granted, many cars won't win a battle with a semi, but I feel more comfortable in a car with longer lines between me and that 18-wheeler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. Hybrid sports car seems like a bit of a contradiction in terms,
but there is a Toyota Highlander and Ford Escape for the SUV fans. Are you really gonna want to battle semis with with a sports car? There's also the Honda Accord hybrid, it's pretty fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #42
93. Hybrid sports car isn't a contradiction in terms.
The Accord for example, supplements the gasoline driven torque with the recaptured electrical energy. It's designed to be faster instead of more efficient, though it will probably save some gas. There was a conceptual race car called the Acura/Honda Dualnote that used this idea for high performance some years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #93
198. The 300 ft/lbs of torque from the electric motor in the Prius is a
real surprise a lot of the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #198
205. The electric motor supplies good torque at the low end.
How did it to at Bonneville?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #205
233. 127mph from a mostly stock drivetrain. Set a land speed record for
hybrids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalPowered Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
65. Subaru has a turbo hybrid sports car scheduled for 2008 or 2009
The concept floated right now looks like this..

%

Toyota recently purchased about a 10% share in Subaru and will help build an American plant. If they put the synergy drive in the outback/imprezza/forester, they'll make a killing. My 01 OB already gets upwards of 34 mpg on the highway. With Synergy, that could easily goto 50.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
72. The hybrid Civics, Accords, and Escapes look just like regular.
Their mileage is far lower, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
153. Nothing is uglier than an SUV or Hummer, imo
it's all a matter of personal tastes. I think the new Prius is wicked cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. Damn those Japs!
It ain't fair, I tell you! Toyota should be forced to delay rollout of the new Prius for ten or twenty years while GM lobbies the government for punitive tariffs catches up. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. You do, of course, know that Ford has a hybrid, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
70. And GM's mass produced hybrid was first.
It didn't sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #70
84. You bet, EV1 got laughed off the market
Great lease deals, and no one cared. Cost over 50 grand to make each.



The EV1 was an all-electric vehicle conceived, developed and built by GM, and offered for lease through Saturn retailers in California and Arizona beginning in December 1996 and through August 2004.

The lead acid EV1 required a 5 to 6 hour charge, which offered a driving range of 55 to 95 miles. The nickel-metal hydride battery pack required a 6 to 8 hour charge, which provided a driving range of 75 to 130 miles. The vehicle was available for lease only, and monthly payments ranged from $299 to $574, with significant subsidies by GM and some governmental incentives.

http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/adv_tech/300_hybrids/hyb_ev1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. The EV-1 was electric?
I must have something confused. I thought it was a hybrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #86
92. It was a great concept, beat the Ricers to market
Too bad they didn't make the choice to go hybrid then. Now the Malibu comes out this year, 15% better all around mileage I think. Don't know the cost though. But I'm sure the smugs will find a reason to knock the crap out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #84
105. That's not a hybrid, that's an electric car. Big, big, difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #105
123. (Sigh) It was a worthy attempt and the concept is valid
I drive around 300 miles a week. I'd LOVE to plug my car in and charge it up. But if the cost of electricity exceeded the same amount of gas (cost) needed to drive the same distance, I choose the cheaper route.

I still think we should return to the stone age. That would solve all the smug problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #84
149. People who had those cars loved them and were angry when...
...they had to give them up.

They had a club...here is the web page

http://ev1-club.power.net/

here's another
http://www.saveev1.org/


In fact- I see there will be a documentary called
"Who Killed the Electric Car"
http://www.whokilledtheelectriccar.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm already getting 100mpg, right now


2005 Bajaj Chetak, 100mpg, cruises at 55-60 mph, four speed manual transmission for quick pickup from a dead stop. <http://www.bajajusa.com>

Wonderful bike, I recommend it for anybody who can ride. No, it doesn't do highways well at all, but for commuting around the city, or traveling the back roads and blacktops, it is ideal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. MadHound, can you imagine me driving that? LOL
That would be COMICAL! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Can't be anymore comical that I look
But hey, I don't care, I'm laughing everytime I pass an SUV sucking it down at the pump!:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. I drive a little SUV, but I also have kiddies to transport. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. For you, there is the Bajaj passenger hauler
Better known as the autorickshaw.


Gets 80mpg, cruises at 40mph, four speed manual tranny, seats five comfortably. It is a three wheeler that also comes in a pickup and panel van style. However don't take it out on the highway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #46
71. OMG! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
145. Bajaj AUTORICKSHAW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
127. Imagine what it would get with an aerodynamic cowling. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
52. Good
Now things will change. The commute from home to work will get further apart. More highways. It'll be cheaper to use gas, so more people will use it for longer distances, and we'll end up to where we're going anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
125. I think that places like KC and Atlanta
who are planning on another ring in the next 30 years are going to be surprised.

Transportation costs are going to screw with globalization dramatically. Fewer grapes from Chile, more local products, more urbanization. By the time I die, if I am lucky, petrochemical feedstocks will become more precious than gasoline. I think that is about 15 years away.

I don't see a hybrid tractor coming out anytime soon, but I do think this technology will affect rail traction. freight cars will need motor/generators and the air line will be replaced by a superconductor buss, but this may really be a great technological advance on the efficiency of rail, which is the surface transit efficiency winner.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
55. meanwhile GM trys to sell more Hummers and Tahoes
Gee I wonder why they are in trouble??? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. (Sigh) they don't try, there is a demand for them
So, because so many of you don't approve of certain vehicles, they shouldn't be produced? Be happy you are doing your best to minimize your carbon footprint here, stop condemning people and companies who won't walk in lockstep with your beliefs.:grr:

By the time hydrogen vehicles eliminate petro powered lumps, we'll all be taking a dirt nap. And don't think steam won't make a comeback either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. I have no problem with companies producing what people want...
But I'm a little irritated about tax breaks for businesses to buy large SUVs. And SUVs not having to meet mileage standards and safety standards for passenger cars when probably 99% of them are used as passenger cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #60
68. My friend, with Corrupt ConJobs in control
we have to put up with it until we can take back the Congress. Bush lied about everything, including reducing our dependence on oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #60
69. yes people should be free to buy what they want to a degree
But the government should put tax incentives to guide the people to do the right thing. Huge gas sipping SUVs are not good for the general population in the long term.

In Europe I believe there are more taxes for cars with more liters displacement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #69
76. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #69
83. Why should it be "to a degree"?????
If people don't think like you , should they be forced to buy only what you deem acceptable? That in and of it self is wrong. People need to make value judgments based on their need and experience. No one here has the right to determine "to a degree" what we should or should not be able to buy as long as it doesn't involve life-threatening devices.

That is my entire point about smug and hybrids. I'll keep my freedom of choice, thank you very fucking much.:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #83
88. That would be great if everyone had their own planet to live on
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 11:16 AM by LSK
Unfortunately we all have to share 1 planet and that is Earth. We all have to breath the same air and all have to share its finite resources.

If someone doesnt like emmissions equipment should we allow him to smog the atmosphere for everyone? Should we allow a whole segment of the population drive 1000 hp cars that get 1 mpg just because they want to??? Nevermind that we will have no oil left in 10 years, because some people are "free" to do what they want now.

If you leave people to do what they want, they will most always choose the selfish me 1st attitude which is detrimental to the environment and the planet and to society as a whole. Governments should look out for the entire population and try and find a balance of what people want and what is good for the collective whole.

There should never be such a thing as a free market, government should always be there to regulate it and steer it towards the better good of everyone.

That being said, our current government is run by the selfish me 1st crowd.

Am I being smug, no. Im looking at the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #88
96. I think you believe a Totalitarian government is best than?
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 11:25 AM by DainBramaged
government should always be there to regulate it and steer it toward the better good of everyone.

The government doesn't know shit, and has become a corrupt behemoth. I can't disagree with you more.

Thank you no, I'll live elsewhere if you are in charge.

And one more thing;

When was the last time Democrats were in charge, 1994? Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #96
98. why do you have to make extremes out of it???
You make the simplistic judgement that its either total freedom or totalitarian government. Why?
Why cant there be a balance. Why cant we strive to meet in the middle somewhere???

Look at what Europe is doing. Read up on third way. When peak oil comes, who will suffer more, the Free Market that you want or society that tried to balance things and look ahead like they have in Europe?

Do you think National Health Care is a bad idea too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #98
102. (Sigh) Europe has a better mass transit system
And because they are (individually) so small in comparison to the US, they were forced to make efficiency choices way before we did.

By the way, I can make any judgment I want, that's the point here. Go argue semantics with someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #60
82. (shrug) Let the companies produce what the yokels want....
JUST GET THE FUCKING CCORPORATE WELFARE OUTTA THE GAME!

If they can make money ON THEIR OWN producing energy wasting, dangerous pieces of crap, morre power to 'em. Just don't ask the taxpayer to cover it - in ANY fashion.


I feel fofr the workers, but GOD I hope the jackass big 3 go into bankruptcy and the execs get kicked out and brought up on rico or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #57
100. Trouble is that the demand for SUVs, and a lot of pickups
Is a manufactured demand. It is a demand that has been artifically creadted by the advertising and marketing departments of the Big Three in order to foist large, gas guzzling, air polluting, inefficient, cheaply made vehicles on the public. Really now, how many people living in the burbs need a four wheel drive, Ford F350 1 ton dually?

These vehciles were promoted by the Big 3 because they have a large profit margin. Before the late eighties, most folks wouldn't touch an SUV or pickup as their primary commuter vehcile. Those were relegated to farm, construction and other industrial sectors who actually had a need for such a vehicle. The only need that these vehicles now fill, for the most part, is that of bolstering up countless insecure male egos and providing a false sense of security.

I don't care if my fellow citizens, both human and corporate, follow my beliefs or not. But I do care a great deal when they continue to use up a non-renewable resource at an inordinate rate, all the while polluting the air we all breath at a rate much higher than those who choose to use smaller, more efficient vehicles. People get all bent out of shape about second hand smoke, but the issue of our declining air quality due to the ongoing use of pickups and SUVs as commuting vehicles gets hardly a peep. And yet who is putting more pollutants into the air?

Frankly, if all vehicles were powered by a bio-diesel hybrid, I wouldn't give a damn what people drove. But the fact that these people continue to pollute my air, and use up a finite resource at a pace higher than normal, all the while getting tax credits for it just burns me no end:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
112. I call Bullshit
They do try...they spend millions on commericials to create demand.

If they would recognize the harm a Hummer does to the environment they wouldn't market them at all and stop production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #112
121. What about tanks and land mines?
I think they are even more harmful, yet our government endorses them. Shouldn't we be more concerned about how destructive they are to the earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #121
204. LOL.
Wow i'm convinced. Since we can't ban military equipment we best not worry about SUVs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenMaster Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
120. STILL NOT ENOUGH
For one simple reason called "thermal inertia". FOSSIL FUEL USE MUST BE ELIMINATED. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #120
138. OK
Please let me know what I can use tomorrow that is 100% fossil fuel free tomorrow. My feet is not a satisfactory answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
122. Good for Toyota. One of the best vehicles on the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
128. There sure are some bitter posts in this thread
The way I see it is this:

1) If you think they are ugly, don't buy one

2) If the size doesn't work for your family, don't buy one

3) If the cost doesn't work for your family, don't buy one

A lot of people are really happy about the auto industry's continued progress in fuel efficiency. Why try to pee on their parade by bring up your specific issues?

Neither the OP of the quoted article passed any judgements on whether any of us should go out and buy a Toyota Prius.

Personally, my family does not have the money to buy any new vehicle right now, and 2009 isn't looking good either, but I still think this Prius is wicked cool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #128
142. great post. Thank you
I got a Prius last year to replace my 13 year old civic with 158,000 miles on it. I love it, I have taken it on several road trips and it has behaved like a champ!

Why people want to dismiss any efforts to lessen our dependence on oil is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #142
171. Same story here. I replaced my '94 with an '05 Prius. Drove it
all over the place, from NC to Indiana, Michigan, etc. I couldn't be happier and I'm getting 53 mpg. I figure I can live with it for at least 10 years. Much zippier than the car it replaced, and quiet and smooth. I don't feel especially smug about it, but folks do tend to invest a lot of their personality in their cars sometimes. If you think you need a Corvette or a Hummer, and can justify that basically on emotional grounds, then why not a Prius on the same basis? I like that it pollutes less, and the gee-whiz of the computerized AC and radio etc. was enough to seal the deal for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #128
150. But this should matter to anyone with a family:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_classics/aninconvenienttruth/

CO2 is a huge factor in climate change, and the Prius has lower emissions than any car on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #150
152. Lower emissions are a huge reason I bought one
and should always be factored in when people consider buying a car.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #128
178. In 30 years we've gone from 15 to 50 mpg
Great progress, could be better all around. But because people own gas sippers is no reason for them to pee on the rest of us, especially the rest of us who want to buy a domestic instead of an import.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #178
242. in 30 years you've gone from 15mpg to 18mpg...
post a pic of you in your 8 year old beater.. I need a good laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #128
192. well said
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 07:51 PM by Blue_Tires
car with better fuel mileage, although not for everyone, is a long overdue step in the right direction and should be applauded, along with continual technological advancement...

I've long been a defender of the big 2.5, but honestly, if it were still up to them, they would still be making cars that get 10 mpg and no emission controls, and telling everyone that the era of cheap gas will last another 1,000 years...and ironically, even in the present day, the offerings of a company like DCX (especially dodge) are MUCH heavier and get worse mileage than they have since the 70s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
139. But it'll still cost too much to bring them to a mechanic,
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 01:48 PM by Craig3410
and the parts are too expensive, and it falls apart too easily, and we live in the country and you need stop and go traffic to charge the battery.... :sarcasm:

At least that's the logic my mother uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #139
148. Big Oil has one hell of a disinformation campaign going, don't they?
I hear the same crap out of a number of SUV driving RWers I know, too.

CO2 emissions are the other big reason to go hybrid. Here's why: http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_classics/aninconvenienttruth/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
154. ttt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
180. I'll make a note of that. May be my next car. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
191. I had planned never to buy a new car.
But if this happens, I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
209. Kampai Toyota!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #209
212. Sure
トヨタはアメリカを憎む
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #212
243. .
それはアメリカを憎むか?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #243
244. --//''>
車の輸入はアメリカの労働者を傷つける
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #244
248. .
本当であるアメリカ車メーカーは悪い選択をしている。
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #248
250. We will conquer again
ライトは私達の側面にある
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #250
254. That doesn't translate very well
"As for the light/write there are on our sides"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
213. Can you tow a boat with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #213
249. nope.
is a substantial portion of your driving with a boat in tow?

if so, then it most definitely aint the car for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
229. Just in time for me to buy a new car.
I love my little Civic. I have has it for 6 years now and I figure in a couple of years it will be time to get a car. This will be perfect timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporate_mike Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
237. Would that be 50MPG according to US standards?
The article is misleading. It says the current Prius gets 99MPG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #237
241. What I get out of it is basically two things: 1) they are making it
Edited on Fri Apr-14-06 12:45 PM by lectrobyte
even more fuel efficient and 2) they are going to cost more like a regular car. Wouldn't have thought this would go on for 200 posts, but there you go. Not sure how the Japanese fuel economy cycle compares to the U.S. one, but I suspect it is focused on stop/go. The current model Insight is rated at 60/66, and the Prius at 60/51 (city/highway mpg) here in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
252. It is a 'milestone'. It is not a 'barrier'.
It is not a big-ass brick wall with Mr. T and Governor Groper pushing from the opposite direction.

Journalists lost the ability to understand words. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC