http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-smerconish/duke-rape-case-revenge-o_b_19029.htmlHere's one little jewel in regards to the Duke rape case:
The "victim" had left a party one night, and met with players (attending summer classes on campus), who invited her back to their house for more partying. The un-named woman admitted to 8 shots of high proof liqueur between 11:30pm and 12:30am. As you might imagine, the woman started to feel sick, and went back to the players' room to vomit in their bathroom. Her blood alcohol content was a whopping .23.
The woman admitted to never having said "No," or offering real resistance to Neal and Cleaves. As the case raged across the headlines and the airwaves, prosecutors contended that the woman was too inebriated to consent to sex, evidenced by her vomiting. Defenders claimed that the sex was consensual and the woman created the allegation out of embarrassment amid gossip from other female basketball players
In November of 2005, a jury acquitted Neal and Cleaves of all charges.
<snip>
I nearly fell out of my chair reading this. I know some people have a problem with the Huffingtonpost site and I usually enjoy the blogs, but I never imagined they'd publish dreck like this! :puke: