Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't you hate it when Bush is called a "War Time President"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:37 PM
Original message
Don't you hate it when Bush is called a "War Time President"?
First of all, I don't believe this country has really had a true declaration of war since World War Two--meaning a declaration approved by both houses of Congress.

Second, the only people sacrificing are enlisted soldiers and their families. In a true wartime I think you would see more sacrifice called for by the country as a whole.

Third, it is a ploy used by Bush and his supporters to deflect criticsm because, "you can't criticize a president during wartime" or "a president must take extrordinary messures (such as domestic spying) during wartime.

The media, of course, falls into this hook, line and sinker and constantly refers to the chimp as a wartime president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate it when he's just called a

President!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. The CHIMP is a "CHIMPANZEE PRESIDENT"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Change "time" to "monger"
and it works out perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. And change 'president' to 'squatter,'
since it appears that he was never really elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes, that was bothering me
that I had let that word stand. Warmonger Squatter. That's fine. Suits him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Perfect descriptor.
Impeach the warmongering squatter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Ha. Well, the "war" part was right, anyway..........eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. best idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Better than calling him
A popular war time president, which fox used to do, until his polls started tanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Do they call him an "unpopular wartime president" now? haha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush is the "End Times President"
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:41 PM by bushmeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. should be "War Causing President". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's a miserable failure who was on watch during our worst attack ever. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. All he should be called is a Walking Cluster**** n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. As you said, a war time president becomes more empowered.
Bu$h IMHO is taking this to the extreme, but our congress is letting him get away with it. If only the congress would hold real oversight, things would be a whole lot different in this country. I watched Fahrenheit 9-11 again last night, it should be required watching for all americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. You should be called a "wartime president" if you *start* the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. They could at least say "UNPOPULAR war time POTUS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Recession Era president" works for me.
"Corporate Merger president" is apt.
The "Big Business president" fits.
A "Deficit Spending president" describes him well.

But I just like to call him:
The "Total Idiot president".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's part of the informercial.
I believe we should counter with the International bedlam President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. any president could have started a war and been a 'wartime' president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. That should be revised to read "War on America pResident" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Next on FOX....Wartime with W! Smash comedy of the season!
Follow the crazy antics of a spoiled frat boy who tries everything to impress his father. But when he goes to far and starts World War III watch the sparks fly and bodies pile up! It's a White House full of laughs as the group of less than competent boobs try and run the most powerful nation in the world. You'll bust a side as they slash budgets and give huge piles of money to thier friends and commit treason all before breakfast!

the critics are RAVING!

Entertainment Tonight: "....like All in the Family only dumber and more evil!"

People Magazine: "After watching Wartime with W who nees the Simpsons?"

Anything can happen in Wartime with W and IT DOES! It's Mission Accomplished on FOX.

Its Wartime!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. He's a war loving president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. But you flat out know
it gives a chubby, don't you?

T-Grannie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mango Suede Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Dazed and Confused for So Long Now
Isn't a war usually between two warring factions? And didn't the US attack Iraq (without invitation or roses)? Couldn't Fox at least head their newscasts with "The US Attack?" Still confused after 3 looong years . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Welcome to DU, Mango Suede.
You're correct. It isn't a war. There's only one side to this.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. had something to say about war on a concept. If I find it, I'll post it.

Welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. War against a non-nation by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 02:31 PM by NYC
The Imperial Presidency
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
Copyright 1973

Page 50

...The doctrine still prevailed, however, that Congress alone could authorize hostilities against sovereign states. But what was the constitutional position when Presidents were confronted by situations calling for the armed protection of American honor, lives, law or property not against sovereign states at all but against roving bands of stateless and lawless people?

Military action against Indians -- stateless and lawless by American definition -- pirates, slave traders, smugglers, cattle rustlers, frontier ruffians or foreign brigands
was plainly something different from warfare against organized governments. It differed both in the juridical status of the combatants under international law and in the practical fact that such fugitive hostilities would not lead to full-scale war. Moreover, a nation's use of armed force to rescue, for example, citizens endangered by the breakdown of order in a foreign land had ample sanction in international practice. Presidents therefore decided that such police actions, not directed at sovereign states, and not requiring special congressional appropriations, did not rise to the dignity of formal congressional concern...


Page 88

...The rise of the executive agreement was accompanied by new presidential exuberance in the commitment of armed force to combat. Victory over Spain made the United States a world power; and in 1900 McKinley set the tone for the new century by sending 5,000 American troops to China. The pretext was the protection of American lives and property. In fact, it was a spectacular case of military intervention for political purposes...

...The intervention in China marked the start of a crucial shift in the presidential employment of armed force overseas. In the nineteenth century, military force committed without congressional authorization had been typically used against nongovernmental organizations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Hi Mango Suede!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spirochete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bush the "War President"
is like someone who murders his parents, then asks the court for leniency because he's an orphan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mango Suede Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thanks for the Welcome - what a site!
T'anks for the welcome, NYC ! I'd been putting off joining this fantastic site for too long.

Arthur was prescient, it seems. Nice job by you of remembering the text.

BTW - Mango Suede is my term for that fellow who supposedly got himself hung up on a wooden crosspiece some time ago. I found myself tired of using the JC monicker when swearing, when I don't even believe in any of that BS. So one day I came up with two totally meaningless words to use when swearing.

Mango Suede, by the way, inhabits a banana plantation in the sky (heaven) . . . and if you don't donate heavily to my tax-free institution, you'll wind up in Camden, New Jersey (hell)

Sorry to go on so long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC