Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The most important things to remember about Rummy and Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:22 AM
Original message
The most important things to remember about Rummy and Bush
NPR summed it up perfectly this morning; Bush doesn't want Rummy to resign because it would supply red meat to his critics. IOW, America, our reputation, our money, our safety, and the lives of our soldiers are all secondary to Bush's EGO. It may well be the best thing for him to resign, but what if someone says "neener neener neener, told ya so!" to Commander Bunnypants? We just can't have that now, can we?

As for Rummy, those on the inside of BushCo aren't calling for his resignation because he is doing exactly what PNAC mapped out. He isn't doing anything wrong. He and Cheney and Jebbie, et al (but curiously -- or incuriously -- not W) invented this strategy, and are determined to stick with it, and so far, with the exception of the deaths of some dark skinned foreigners, their plan for a permanent presence in the Middle Eastern oil fields, while not going along exactly as intended, is nonetheless relative on-target.

Why should Rummy resign when he is doing just what he was charged with doing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. removing Rummy would break up the "act"
They're like the Three Stooges:

Cheney is Moe--the meanest and the idea man--but he's only smart by comparison with the other two.

Rummy is Larry--a nasty disposition and stupid solutions to problems!

Bush is Curly --so stupid that he's funny. Says strange words. Makes strange faces. Has a temper!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!! You got it right, but don't forget the back room players
that applaud these three morans on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good Lord, I think you've got it! Good analogy there. Perfect, in fact.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. OMG!
The 3 stooges are running the show. I don't know whether to :rofl: or :cry:

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush has defended Rumsfeld for so long that to accept his
resignation now would be admitting to making a mistake. This would be totally out of character for Bush and I don't expect it will happen, unless something comes up that makes it necessary for Rumsfeld to step down due to a life threatening illness, or something similar. If it does happen, it can't look as though it was because Bush was pressured into taking action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Keep tuned in
you'll know it's over when Bush says "your doing a heck of a job Rummy".
Oh wait he already said that, SEE YA RUMMY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. insider?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. now that was interesting!
Makes you go "hmmm..."

What I find most credible is the prez being on massive anti-depressants. And probably Laura as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick & rec! (meanwhile..."West Point grads" + retired generals...)
Edited on Fri Apr-14-06 10:40 AM by tiptoe
West Point Grads against the war! It's happening! April 13, 2006

Rumsfeld Faces Growing Revolt by Retired Generals By DAVID S. CLOUD, ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER, NYTimes, April 13, 2006
...
Today, Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr., who led troops on the ground in Iraq as recently as 2004 as the commander of the Army's 82nd Airborne Division, became the fifth retired senior general in recent days to issue a public call for Mr. Rumsfeld's ouster.

"We need to continue to fight the global war on terror and keep it off our shores," General Swannack said in an interview. "But I do not believe Secretary Rumsfeld is the right person to fight that war based on his absolute failures in managing the war against Saddam in Iraq."

A second former Army commander in Iraq, Maj. Gen. John Batiste, who led the 1st Infantry Division, publicly broke ranks with Mr. Rumsfeld on Wednesday. In recent weeks, Gen. Anthony C. Zinni and Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold, who both retired from the Marines, and Maj. Gen. Paul D. Eaton, who retired from the Army, have also spoken against Mr. Rumsfeld.

Several former generals involved said that while they were unaware of any an organized effort to bring down Mr. Rumsfeld, other officers critical of Mr. Rumsfeld were exchanging e-mail messages and telephone calls with one another, weighing the pros and cons of going public.
...


More Retired Generals (6) Call for Rumsfeld's Resignation (April 14, 2006)


Disgruntled "Generals Criticize Handling of Iraq War" April 13, 2006
...
JIM LEHRER: So where do you fit Don Rumsfeld into that then? He's one person. Everybody wants him to -- you guys want him to go. So what are you saying to me?

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: I think an honorable man would take account, be responsible for what he did, and step down.

JIM LEHRER: What would you say to a skeptic who would say, "Wait a minute, General. One secretary of defense is solely responsible for everything that's gone wrong in Iraq, and there is nothing that any of you military leaders could do about it on the ground?"

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: I didn't say that. What I'm saying is that the strategic underpinnings of this war can be traced back in policy to the secretary of defense. He built it the way he wanted it.

JIM LEHRER: Do you expect Secretary Rumsfeld to do what you want him to do?

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: I have no idea.

JIM LEHRER: I mean, do you...

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: He's his own man.

JIM LEHRER: Is that a bottom line for you? Have you talked to these other generals about this? Is this an organized effort?

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: You know, surprisingly, it's not, not at all. We haven't talked; this is all spontaneous.

JIM LEHRER: Did you talk about it at the time when you were on active duty in private?

MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: Sure. We were all disgruntled.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here are the six generals...


From left:

(1)Major General Paul D. Eaton

(2)General Anthony C. Zinni

(3)Lieutenant General Gregory Newbold

(4)Major General John Batiste

(5)Major General John Riggs

(6)Major General Charles H. Swannack Jr.

And possibly more to come...

But there were also signs that the spate of retired generals calling for Mr. Rumsfeld's departure was not finished. Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper, who is retired from the Marine Corps, said in an interview Thursday he had received a telephone call from another retired general who was weighing whether to publicly join the calls for Mr. Rumsfeld's dismissal.

"He was conflicted, and when I hung up I didn't know which way he was going to go," General Van Riper said.


I have to include this paragraph from page 1...

"Are the floodgates opening?" asked one retired Army general, who drew a connection between the complaints and the fact that President Bush's second term ends in less than three years. "The tide is changing, and folks are seeing the end of this administration."

NYTimes article




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC