Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barb. Starr on CNN dismissing the 6 generals as unimportant because

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:09 PM
Original message
Barb. Starr on CNN dismissing the 6 generals as unimportant because
they are retired!....According to her if a current, acting general would "fall on his sword" and make the same statements as the 6, to quote Starr, that would be important!....Sounds like bullshit to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, important to them...
Edited on Fri Apr-14-06 01:26 PM by gatorboy
To label any general still on duty, that opposes the war, as a traitor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. wonder what they are going to say when one does, and then is
followed by others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like bullshit to me too! Quick lets get back to the bear story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. And opinions are like @ssh#les. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. ain't that the truth
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. They would have lost their pensions if they had refused to follow
orders from Rumsfeld and Bush. How dumb can you get? Or how dumb do they think all Americans are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. that is BULLSHIT
and she knows it, for an active duty General to say that would maybe lose all their retirement :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Isn't it an automatic courtmartial for an active duty general to
question the Pentagon or the President?

I might be way off here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Starr needs to take off her govt. issue prescription lenses
You know, those rose colored ones she wears. Also, her psy-ops transmitter needs to be turned off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. like Zinni did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't see her point.
They were active under Rummy, they had first hand experience. They are as credible as an active duty officer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. she is a bush whore
no point necessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. It IS bullshit.
I heard one general speaking on NPR yesterday. HE SPOKE OUT while in uniform and lost part of his pension, ONE STAR and was forced to resign. Barbara Starr...hahahahahahahahah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. You know, with these so-called reporters it boils down to 1 thing:
a seat on the plane. Just watch. The soft peddlars are the ones who usually get to fly around the world on Air Force One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. And Who is Barb. Starr? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. She is the Pentagon reporter for CNN /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. Exactly... a hack
with no credibility on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Such a General would be in serious stuff
if he were to do so. Loss of rank and bennies, hell, they might be able to make a case for treason charges - you know this administration. She needs to get her facts straight before she spouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Still, Sir
It would be good if one on active service did so, and resigned immediately afterwards. A general's trade, when all is said and done, is to compell other people to disregard the risk of grievous physical harm to themselves in the name of some higher interest beyond their personal well-being, and a general who will not subject himself to risk of a much slighter nature in that same higher interst of the nation he serves cuts a pretty poor figure, that no man of character could happily obey on the firing line....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. You Sir, are quite right
but that would require some serious steel. I'm not sure that at this time in our history one can become a General and still have that much character.

Such an action would, of course, have some true impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. That Is Probably The Case, Sir
Your avatar will be grinning big as life outside my third-storey window before that happens, and for the reason you suggest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wow, knowledgeable opinions of american citizens unimportant
I'm retired, I guess I'll just shut the fuck up - NOT!

Babs may get her wish, an active duty general just may step up to the mike and call bullshit, bullshit. And bush said he'd listen to his commanders in the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I don't agree with her that Zinni and others are meaningless props, but I
would like to see an active duty General come out and say, "I will not continue to support this travesty. I quit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. General Shinseki
He is perhaps most famous for publicly contradicting the Bush Administration's estimate of the number of troops needed for the Iraq War. By telling a congressional committee that he thought an occupying force of several hundred thousand men would be needed to stablize postwar Iraq, he broke ranks with the Bush Administration's estimate of only 100,000 troops. Both Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, and Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, immediately labeled Shinseki's estimates "far off the mark"<1> and "wildly off the mark".<2> But history has proven Shinseki's much higher estimates to be more accurate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_of_General_Shinseki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. When I was on active duty
in the late 90's - Zinni was God in the Marine Corps! I recall a movie starring Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones, both playing Marine Corps Colonels. Jones character was talking to a civilian in the white house who was a slimy bastard and said do you want a pissed off marine on your ass. The guy was sweating profusely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. Catch 22: they're not supposed to speak out publicly when they're active.
The usual "fall on their sword" move is to resign, so they can speak freely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. They can dismiss it all they (whoremedia) like, it
won't change the reality that it is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rumor is she may get her wish.
I don't have any links, but the other day I read several reports that said "several high ranking military officers said they would resign their commission if the Admin. does not take nukes off the table in discussions abouf Iran."

Being the stubborn fools that Shrub & Rummy are, I won't be surprised to see these resignations from the military happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. We can only pray you are right!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
41. That was in Hersch's article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. CNN apologists
I don't really mind the CNN apologists as of late. They are not jumping on the retired generals story or the Bush leak story too heavily, but if they did the neocons would all be shouting that the media is attacking them. I think it may be best that they keep a mellow tone for now and just let the truth sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Why not just report the facts then?...Why did she make a personal comment
at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I noticed...
They seem to be jumping in during the middle of these stories and saying summarily, "Oh but it's not that serious..." What they mean is it's not so serious that * is finally going to be impeached like he deserves. Then they give some whacked out rationalization. I agree their rationalizations have no validity to them, but they are correct in stating that these events unfortunately are not leading to *'s impeachment as they should. Their whacked out excuses are just a reflection of the Republican mindset as flawed as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm surprised they haven't been refered to as 'disgruntled ex-
generals' yet. That's becoming the standard response to any that disagree with the administration. Perhaps Ms. Starr should remember that this is the time-tested way that senior figures at the Pentagon can use as a channel for dissent. For every open criticism that a retired General makes there are a lot more serving officers that say the same thing confidentially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. And if they did anything while they were still active duty,
they would shame them for turning on the military, not following the chain of command, demoralizing the troops, you name it, whatever they could come up with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. It would have been the same as
a coup de' etat

No sworn officier would do that while in Uniform....unfortunately, it may take that to get Bush off of his Iran kick.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. what about that female general at abu graib who was demoted to Col.
she has spoken out and is still not retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Karpinski retired after she was demoted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Proves their patriotism. They retired, then spoke. Or some of them did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. She's a powder puff moran.
CNN only hires the brain-dead now, just like Foxnews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. Catch-22
an active-duty general complains, and he's dismissed as a disgruntled person passed over for a plum assignment or "not a team player"....and cannot be trusted

a retired general complains, and he's criticized for not speaking out before retirement...and cannot be trusted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. Well, we've just had Jeff Greenfield (CNN) poo-pooing it too.
His explanation is that this has always gone on. He made some weak observation at the end that this time was different, but it wasn't very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. The Corp Media still needs to support
the Bush Regime because most of the Media Moguls were complicit in the lies that lead to the Illegal Invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC