Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNET: ISP snooping gaining support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:42 PM
Original message
CNET: ISP snooping gaining support
ISP snooping gaining support

By Declan McCullagh
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: April 14, 2006, 4:03 AM PDT

The explosive idea of forcing Internet providers to record their customers'
online activities for future police access is gaining ground in state capitols
and in Washington, D.C.

Top Bush administration officials have endorsed the concept, and some members
of the U.S. Congress have said federal legislation is needed to aid law enforcement
investigations into child pornography. A bill is already pending in the Colorado
State Senate.
<snip>
Proposals for mandatory data retention tend to adhere to one of two models:
Address storage or some kind of content storage. In the first model, businesses
must record only which Internet address is assigned to a customer at a specific time.
In the second, which is closer to what Europe adopted, more types of information must be
retained--including telephone numbers dialed, contents of Web pages visited, recipients
of e-mail messages and so on.

Without saying what model he favored, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff broadly
endorsed data retention at a meeting of a departmental privacy panel last month. In response
to a question, Chertoff said that federal police should be permitted to run queries against
data repositories created and maintained by businesses for a set time.
<snip>

Full article: http://news.com.com/ISP+snooping+gaining+support/2100-1028_3-6061187.html?tag=nefd.lede

Justifications start with child pornography and then go on to terrorism,
drug crimes, and tax fraud.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Political speech won't be far behind.
But with all the creative techies out there an alternative to the current internet is likely to emerge - one that is devoid of governmental snooping.

Here's one such attempt: http://www.freenetproject.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. are you insinuating that america is not
exceptional?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm saying America is at best average.
The ideals that once made America great are now just words dusted off every election cycle and spoken without meaning.

On its best day the USA is just average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Spying is what it's all about! What country has this become? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why not go after the child pornographers, and shut them down?
No, they want to watch your footsteps through their 'net. Meanwhile, they have the purchasers of child pornography working in Homeland Defense. Makes my head spin. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. technical question...
What if someone uses your internet connection and does bad stuff on your computer without your knowledge? It has to happen all the time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You would be responsible.

Same thing applie to your home wireless network, someone connects to and downloads illegal things, you are held responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC