Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hit piece on Patrick Fitzgerald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:06 AM
Original message
Hit piece on Patrick Fitzgerald
...
Meanwhile, on the national front, another case with greater gravitas seems to be faltering along, losing steam, as it slowly staggers to a halt under its own ponderous weight of baggage and camp followers.

Patrick Fitzgerald seems to be slowly sinking into the same quicksand with his highly touted Libby indictment, despite being hailed as the new brilliant squeaky clean Elliot Ness by the New York Times, a paper never noted for inaccurate hyperbole when it comes to an active White House opponent.

Much to the disagreement and certain dyspepsia of the progressive political pundits, Mr. Fitzgerald has had to take a second sheepish step backwards after his initial all out charge for the finish line, an Electoral College sweep and an early standing offer for Attorney General, or at least an invitation to the Indian wrestle off with Elliot Spitzer or was it Elliot Ness, who can be sure anymore?

The first awkward withdrawal was called when it was revealed by Mr. Bob Woodward, a relatively well known journalist possessing some relevant credentials, explained that he had learned of the late great Valerie Plame exhaustive spluttering before the great defender of all that’s right and noble, the new Untouchable without the Thompson gun, Mr. Patrick Fitzgerald averred and ejaculated that the previously indicted Mr. Scooter Libby had.
...

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/burtis041506.htm

Burtis is apparently yet another Bush masturbator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. You sure about that?
I'm afraid I'm going to consider the Libby indictment damage control and an attempt to throw one guy to the lions to protect the guys at the top unless Fitzgerald actually produces more indictments.

The constant drip drip drip of grand jury leaks just aren't doing it.

Unless there are more indictments, this is just another exercise in protecting the criminals at the top.

I am a pessimist. That means I'm never crushed while I stay open to pleasant surprises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, my impression from the article
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 01:46 PM by EstimatedProphet
was that this jerk writer was complaining about the fact that there's an investigation at all, because of course Republicans Can Do No Wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, that last paragraph you cited certainly proves your point!!!
Horrific writing...that fellow is disturbed as well as full of crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Apparently, Burtis is confused by his own convoluted sentence.
He claims: The first awkward withdrawal was called when it was revealed by Mr. Bob Woodward, a relatively well known journalist possessing some relevant credentials, explained that he had learned of the late great Valerie Plame exhaustive spluttering before the great defender of all that’s right and noble, the new Untouchable without the Thompson gun, Mr. Patrick Fitzgerald averred and ejaculated that the previously indicted Mr. Scooter Libby had.

That's not true on any account, but I wonder if Burtis actually meant what he said which is that Woodward learned of Valerie Plame's identity before Scooter Libby had. I don't believe anyone has claimed that, what they claimed is that Woodward learned of her identity before Libby revealed her name to another reporter.

And, of course, as everyone paying attention knows, Fitzgerald very clearly stated that libby was the first "known" admin official to reveal her name to the press. which was true at the time it was made, and no subsequent revelation can make it untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC