Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking News: Scientists Say They're Being Gagged by Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:27 PM
Original message
Breaking News: Scientists Say They're Being Gagged by Bush
Washington - Scientists doing climate research for the federal government say the Bush administration has made it hard for them to speak forthrightly to the public about global warming. The result, the researchers say, is a danger that Americans are not getting the full story on how the climate is changing.

These scientists - working nationwide in research centers in such places as Princeton, N.J., and Boulder, Colo. - say they are required to clear all media requests with administration officials, something they did not have to do until the summer of 2004. Before then, climate researchers - unlike staff members in the Justice or State departments, which have long-standing policies restricting access to reporters - were relatively free to discuss their findings without strict agency oversight.

"There has been a change in how we're expected to interact with the press," said Pieter Tans, who measures greenhouse gases linked to global warming and has worked at NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder for two decades. He said that although he often "ignores the rules" the administration has instituted, when it comes to his colleagues, "some people feel intimidated - I see that."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041706F.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can see it now
Bush goes on the teevee (Fox, natch) wearing shorts and a tank top this December, saying, "This is my Christmas wish for you.....there is no global warming, this is merely another service presented to the 'Merkan people so that they can have cookouts on Dec. 15!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know it's not a funny situation, but I have to say, that made me laugh
pretty hard.. The scary part is that you're probably right..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would scientists allow Bush to
muzzle them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They work for the federal government, who pays their wages.
I guess if they want to get paid, making a stink risks said paycheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Either being paid off for silence or afraid of losing positions/grants n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Perhaps, it has to do with all the deaths of microbiologist
over the past few years. I don't know what the latest figure is but it was up to over 40, most of whom were working on bio-weapons.

I don't know why they should allow this bully to keep them quiet. Actually, the more they talk, they safer they become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Over 40? OMG!!!!!!!!!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. That is serious
Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rumor has it that Bush says no to changing air-polluting laws
for US. refineries because it would effect the economy. Hope the green-house thing has nothing to do with unusual amount of powerful storms in the past two years??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. i always hate the "effect the economy" excuse...
what- they don't think that global warming will "effect the economy"...?

btw- putting money into alternative energy research would also probably "effect the economy"- in a GOOD way...with growth and jobs that pay a living wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Unfortunately, that's become the CW
Somehow, doing anything to reduce greenhouse gases is "bad for the economy". They maek it sound like all industries will have to shut down, we'll have to stop driving cars or have to pay exorbitant energy costs.

In fact, it would take so little effort, just a rethinking of what we're already doing. Stop the waste, stop the frivolous uses of energy, look for alternatives - it's not radical, just pragmatic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. SO THE FUCK AM I!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. There wa something about this on 60 Minutes
in March 2006, with James Hansen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is hardly breaking news. This has been going on for years
The MSM is just finally picking up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. That headline...
he makes me gag too.

I know it isn't funny, not at all but when I first read that I thought, of course he gags them, I gag everytime I hear the man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL, I know it wasn't funny either, but I had to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I am feeling too perverse
today for company. I have a meeting to prepare for so I will stop with my silliness right now but I am glad to know I was not the only one who just has to take days to laugh at the disgusting state of affairs we find ourselves in. :hi:

I will be better tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Not to worry. Tomorrow is another day. See you then.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Okay, so call me slow, I now see why Santorum wants to get rid of NWS
so he and others can control the information about the weather that the masses get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yeah, that fucker makes ME gag, too
All kidding aside, when do we rise up in protest about these assholes trying to build that bridge to the 15th century? I expect the witch-burnings to start any day now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. 60 minutes did a piece on this...Sierra has covered this story..
Bush** et al either:
1. Ignore the Science.
2. Re-Write the science.
3. Stopped requesting reports that contained science.
4. Gagged the scientists.
5. All of the Above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. That's "news"??? What's new about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. That was my first reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's not just the scientists....
There are scientists all over the world filing reports on global warming and the destruction of the environment. The MSM in America is simply not giving it the coverage. Once we moved to the UK I figured that out pretty quickly. It's consistently in the news in the UK and it's ain't looking too good folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. The UK has been right out in front
with many of the latest ecological news stories. When I asked one of our Democratic contenders for the House a question about Global Climate Change, I quoted one of the UK papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. "amounts to a "pocket veto" allowing administration officials to block
interviews by not giving permission in time for journalists' deadlines." He's playing pocket pool again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Theocons" "Theocrats" = Labels that evoke the repugnant. . .
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 03:42 PM by pat_k
. . .nature of what we are contending with by connecting "theocracy" with the horrible consequences of permitting the neocon empire builders to infiltrate and dominate our government. ("Beware of false prophets. . . By their fruits you will know them." Matthew 7:15-20)

Rev. Neuhaus often misses the mark, but I loved it when he used the terms "theocon" and "theocrat" on Meet the Press this week.

Haven't come across the terms before, but they are terms we should be using. They convey a core truth about the reactionary-christianist-right. Whether monarchy, theocracy, or military dictatorship, it's all fascism -- the belief that a faction has the right to absolute rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. That's the same reaction I've always had to ace and his Daddy...
both. The GOPers Ace in the hole, even makes half the repig party puke too. Their pig is all the way out of the poke now and they all think he's crazy too now. First American pResident to come unglued in the head, in front of the entire world. It would have been different if he's really been the president that the people had REALLY elected. His administration was a constitutional aberration created by 5 people, from the first day. People who controlled the highest court in the nation made a flawed, biased, unfair, political decision and stopped the recounts in Florida.

So we see by the Supreme Court decision in Bush vs Gore, that GOP political partisanship controlled the highest Federal Court back then. They gladly and quickly gave Bush the control of the office of president. Diebold/DeLay and the swift boat type political terrorist's dirty politics in 2002, gave bush total control of the government, when the GOP won control of the legislative branch too. How can the GOP blame anyone for their blundering stupidity besides the GOP? * * * * ***** They BROKE IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC