Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wolf: "Bad Polls For * and the REPUBLICAN-LED Congress"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:27 PM
Original message
Wolf: "Bad Polls For * and the REPUBLICAN-LED Congress"
Didn't he get today's memo?

I'll take it. Every drip helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
handsignals4theblind Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. so what- You have no Oppositon- just corporate dominated Democrats
The USA needs a party that backs labour as a credible opposition. The Democrats have been a joke since 1968 and suck up to the same corporate sponsors-----a useless opposition that follows polls, has little principles and are nothing more than Republican lite. After all the over rated Clinton was the one that opened up NAFTA and never vetoed the class oriented legislation that attacked those on welfare.

America your not that politically sophisticated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry
but we have zero tolerance for the likes of you-this is no time to be spouting off about a third party.Either vote dem or repub-no other has a chance.So..if you like the way things have been going for the past 5 and a half years vote green or whatever because you're only helping the GOP with your illogical stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But ask yourself Would Kerry have nominated Sam Alito to the Supremes?
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 06:51 PM by DanCa
I object to the term republican lite. John Kerry would have never had place Sam Alito on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed...
And the big thing that the third party crowd misses is how much we can do WITHIN the Democratic party to make positive changes through primaries, actism, and that sort of thing. The dems are sensitive to their constituents, we just need to win hearts and minds in the party with postive causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Or John Roberts either. And we'd be back on Kyoto too.
Further, I don't think South Dakota would have passed its Rapist Protection Act if they didn't think there was a sympathetic Supreme Court at the end of the appeal process.

You'd have to be pretty far on the fringes to think that Kerry and * would govern the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. How's things in Canada lately?
Hear they went hard right last election. Not a majority, but a plurality using the same tactics as were used here. How's that working out for you?



Glass houses and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. This democratic underground; we approve of Democrats here.
John Kerry is one of the most consistently liberal voters in the Senate. Al Gore may be the leading environmental spokesman on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ????? I don't understand your post.
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 07:18 PM by stopbush
The point of my OP was that this was the first time that I've heard Blitzer attached the word
"Republican" to bad Congressional poll numbers. In the past, it's been, "*'s numbers are bad, but those for Congress are
even worse."

The good news is that the MSM is now developing a story line that says "Rs are in big trouble in Nov." Tagging
the Congress as R might mean that the MSM is looking for a D takeover in abig way.

That's why I said I'd take the drip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC