Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My lttes got under someone's skin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SSX Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:57 PM
Original message
My lttes got under someone's skin
I don't know which letter I wrote got to this person, but it did. May have been a cumulative thing. Of course I had to write a reply
( after letter)

http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060417/OPINION03/604170323/1014/OPINION

Bush unfairly criticized

I am sick and tired of reading the ridiculous letters from Brian Essex. Doesn't he have a newspaper in Jackson he can write to?

Mr. Essex, no one except for you and the rest of your Democrat buddies have even thought about "nuking" Iran.

If you haven't noticed, there are a whole lot of these people out there called terrorists. And these people do not like Americans. They will do whatever they can to kill us.

Bush has a very tough job trying to protect this country, and you, from these people.

I think he's done a pretty good job considering there has not been another attack on this country since 9/11. Maybe you could quit bashing Bush and do something constructive.

If you have any better ideas on how to fight terrorism, why don't you run for president?

By the way, why don't you focus on something else besides Bush. If you haven't noticed, he's not going back in office in the next election. What good does it do to bash him everyday like you do?

I think you need a hobby.

Chris Lowe,

Purvis

My reply-
I hate to break it to Chris Lowe ("Bush unfairly criticized" letter of April 17) but it is not just me and my "democratic buddies" that fear George Bush nuking Iran. A number of news organizations, publications and journalists with proven track records are asking the same questions as I am and I have written letters to them also. One of the hopes is in bringing the plans to light is that the American people will see the folly in this idea and rise up against it through dissent, the contacting of legislators and the petitioning of the government, which are all within our rights as Americans.
I cannot disagree with you that most of my letters that have been printed are anti- Bush. I have a laser like focus in that regards. I believe if you have a problem you should confront it head on. He was the person in charge during 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Katrina, the CIA leaks, and the yet innumerable corruption problems rising out of the Republican controlled Congress. If I were not to go after the person at the top of the ladder whom would you suggest?
As far as ideas go to protect us from terrorists, I would remove our troops from the Middle East, where they are acting as flypaper and bring them home to protect us here. We have, by our presence there and our unflinching support of Israel, created the problems that we now are confronting. Terrorism was around long before Mr. Bush stepped into the scene and will be around long after. You can aggravate a problem or try to solve it. Mr. Bush has chosen the former. If foreign oil dependency is the problem, raise the fuel efficiency of all vehicles by 10 miles per gallon and that problem is solved.
If these ideas appeal to you, please note that I am old enough to run for President, so if you wish, you may write me in on your 2008 ballot.
And lastly, I hate to break it to you, but this is my hobby and also an avenue to preach to someone besides the choir. If I can help one person understand the problems that lie before us as citizens and assist them in making an informed decision then I have achieved my goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ask him if the ANTHRAX attack doesn't count as a terrorist attack post 911
Who did that attack? How come the Right never mentions that attack?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. we're supposed to have forgotten about that
sssh, be quiet. move along please, nothing to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Be careful
Your use of logic and cogent points might make his head implode. Moran he may be, but you don't need that on your conscience, right? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jigarotta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. that doofus said:
"I think he's done a pretty good job considering there has not been another attack on this country since 9/11."

when * has been attacking the country since the get go with his new rules to jam even more cash in his friend's jean pockets. That POS has attacked Everything internal, education, security, laws, constitution. etc ying yang.

guess some dolts think an 'attack' only means an Action Movie bomb scenario
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. i like how they've made that a benchmark of junior's alleged success..
the whole "I think he's done a pretty good job considering there has not been another attack on this country since 9/11" mindset. By those standards, Clinton should be a fucking god to these imbeciles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jigarotta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. junior IS successful
look what he has done for the PNACers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SSX Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The "protecting us" mindset
is the greatest propaganda tool they have come up with. You have to know in your heart that if the terrorists wanted to attack us here they would. They have just not done it again. If the Bushco team had been thwarting attacks stateside, don't you know they would be falling all over themselves to leak it to Faux News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Kinda makes one wonder...
My explanation is that having Bush in office starting wars around the ME is EXACTLY what the terrorists want. Better for recruitment, better to radicalize the governments, better to destabilize the governments that are still our friends.

Or, jamming on my tinfoil for a second... it's simply more MIHOP. Bin Laden won't attack the US because he either doesn't have an order to do so (as of yet) OR he never really did in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very good reply to Chris Lowe. I would hope that his ignorance
would dissipate like a cloud in the sky. But freepers don't have the mentality to understand even when you paint a beautiful picture.

And you did indeed paint a beautiful picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very well done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. In my day, if you felt threatened, you stepped up to the plate. The
problem with this country today is that most want the pResident to "protect" them.

It is not his job. The second amendment exists because Americans are expected to protect themselves. The President is to protect, defend and preserve the Constitution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. great reply
let us know if they print it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent reply
Let us know if you get a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good work....
How does this guy know how many terrorists there are? For starters, terrorism is a tactic, not a group, and as a tactic its been used by a lot of people. That leaves Al Quaida, who BushCo is always claiming to have killed off 75% of them, or their second in command, or some claim meant to impress. Yet we still have to be constantly afraid, fork over all our money, not question anything the government does, close our eyes and pray the terra-ist don't git us!!

None of us really knows a damned thing about what BushCo is doing in the "war on terror".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Less than half of 1% of all people in the world are terrorists, Chris.
I guess Mr. Lowe thinks that's "a whole lot" of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC