Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Live & Let Live" Morality vs. Legality - Purity Ball Revisited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 12:18 PM
Original message
"Live & Let Live" Morality vs. Legality - Purity Ball Revisited
Having returned this morning to a thread begun yesterday afternoon, I was astounded by what I found there. The thread was on fire!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=958611&mesg_id=958695

I was Reply #3 to the original post and I replied to Reply #1 before I had to carry on with my day...

"Live and let live" is a motto that I have lived by my entire life, as many liberals have - you could say that it is a cornerstone. Morality, it seems, is truly in the eye of the beholder, and law is law.

I see this argument in the original thread: If it's illegal, then it's bad. If it's legal, it's o.k. Parental responsibility trumps all, unless it's illegal.

The American legal system is based primarily on the Common Law that arrived with "us" from England - Common Law was based on common ideas of what was fair, right and moral at the time. Generally speaking, the law is in flux at all times, guided by the prevailing winds of morality, or Right vs. Wrong. You don't need to hear it from me that "morals" have been the hot button issue for many years now and that they have been steadily pushing at the foundations of our Democracy - stepping over the line between Church and State.

The questions I posit are these:

If the laws that are in place pertaining to rape, incest, molestation, etc. (sex crimes) - "moral" laws, if you will - somehow were stricken from the books, would it make those actions any less reprehensible? Would it give any sense of justice to the person we can no longer call a victim? Does taking away the criminal aspect make it acceptable?

and...

As to virginity until marriage - what if you are unable to be legally married? Are you supposed to remain a virgin for the rest of your life? Does being homosexual render a person illegal? Is there some unwritten clause in the morality of virginity that allows for homosexual sex outside of marriage?

______________________________________________________________

My personal opinion - Women and Girls are no longer Property! Get TF over it, all ya' all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC