|
it is a symptom--
Thus far it has been misdiagnosed. And as ever with all misdiagnoses, when one treats the symptom--it might go away, but the underlying cause will have it recur--sometimes in a much stronger way (i.e. builds up resistance)
How has it been diagnosed thus far?
"Clash of Civlizations" "They hate us for our freedom" "Islam is inherently violent, etc." "They do not value human life" etc.
The correct diagnosis of this symptom should be tied to U.S. foreign policy and its manifestation (two separate, but connected issues). The economic and political hegemony, Cold War mentalities, hypocritical standards regarding human rights, etc.---all of these covered with an air of moral superiority and the notion the "we know best" and must teach others how to be civilized etc. Add to that the complete ignorance on the average citizen's part regarding the region in question, its inherent diversity, the history behind its creation and subjugation. Then add a heaping dose of arrogance tied to the idea that the region's peoples are blind to the effects of our foreign on them on a daily basis.
A similar sort of mentality was apparent during the Vietnam era-- once we began to help people, work with them to rebuild what we destroyed, and the like-- sightings of the Vietcong skyrocketed. In other words-- we undercut/submarined/sidestepped the resistance by providing a viable alternative--one that was respectful, recalcitrant, and productive.
Anyone wonder why Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood have so much support in Occupied Territories and Egypt respectively? Support of terrorists as heroes? (only partly) Support of the various social services (clinics, schools, charities, etc) provided by the two groups (bingo)
So far we bomb the hell of folks-- and then call them ungrateful for not being willing to trust us or work with us.
Hopefully folks will address some of these points--- I'd be happy to go on with you all about it.
|