Question on the Duke alleged rape case:

[smacky44]

The timeline being talked about by the defense is based on a neighbors recolletion of the time the neighbor allegedly saw the dancer going back into the house, or trying to go back into the house. My question is, is the neighbor's recollection of the time accurate. Did the neighbor set household clocks to DST? Wasn't incident around the time of changing the clocks? Just curious.

[aikoaiko]

1. Rape is sexual violence!!!!!!!! ooops wrong thread.

:-)

[Strong Atheist]

2. Wow. Brave to post on this topic early in your career! I salute you!

:patriot:

Hope you have your flame-proof vest on!

Welcome to D.U.!:toast:

Edited to add: I assume you are a fan of Get Fuzzy?

[onenote]

3. why do you think anyone here knows?

rolls eyes


onenote

[Neil Lisst]

4. No, the incident was not the weekend of the time change.

It was a week or two before the time change, and the primary verification of the time stamps on photos is the presence in some photos of a watch, which watch shows the same time as the time on the photos.

Other parts of the timeline are provided by cell phone records, cab records, and dorm records.

[smacky44]

7. Thanks. I like to play dective, that's my only reason for asking.

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

5. It could be a factor

but I'm sure the police ascertained that the clocks were accurate.

[porphyrian]

6. We don't know.

No one here has all the evidence, though many people have already passed judgement without it.

[Neil Lisst]

8. We do know that it wasn't the weekend of the time change. And,

we know when the cab driver arrived to pick up one of the accused men.