Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House knew there were no WMD: CIA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:44 AM
Original message
White House knew there were no WMD: CIA
The CIA had evidence Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction six months before the 2003 US-led invasion but was ignored by a White House intent on ousting Saddam Hussein, a former senior CIA official said, according to CBS.

Tyler Drumheller, who headed CIA covert operations in Europe during the run-up to the Iraq war, said intelligence opposing administration claims of a WMD threat came from a top Iraqi official who provided the US spy agency with other credible information.

The source "told us that there were no active weapons of mass destruction programs," Drumheller said in a CBS interview to be aired on Sunday on the US network's 60 Minutes.

"The (White House) group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested," he was quoted as saying in interview excerpts released by CBS on Friday.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=67020
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. This administration seems to have pissed off the CIA
Bwwaaaa haaaa haaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. About time someone did get pissed off!
Edited on Sat Apr-22-06 04:05 AM by AGENDA21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. but the font may be wrong
so that means the content is not accurate. I am curious what the administration will do to this one. Maybe they don't care because George is in his second term and can't be elected again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. "They were no longer interested".....
in the truth, that is. Bush had his little, teeny, tiny war hard-on and was going to take Saddam out because he threatened his Daddy. 2,400 American lives, countless innocent Iraqi lives and $400 billion dollars later we're STILL living George Bush's lie in Iraq. :eyes: NOW can we impeach that son of a bitch? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC