Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S.Official: Iran Could Have Material For 10 Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:10 AM
Original message
U.S.Official: Iran Could Have Material For 10 Weapons
Robert Joseph, undersecretary of state for arms control, on April 21 cited Iranian claims earlier this month to have converted enough uranium for 110 tons of UF-6 gas for enrichment in centrifuges, an amount he said could provide material for more than 10 weapons.

Joseph told reporters in Washington that the United States believes Iran is now moving quickly to establish its nuclear program.

"It's fair to say, I believe, that the Iranians have put both feet on the accelerator. They're moving very quickly to establish new realities on the ground, associated with their nuclear program," Joseph said.

Another senior U.S. diplomat, Nicholas Burns, called on Russia to cancel a planned sale of air defense missile systems to Iran because of Iran's nuclear development.

http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/04/90649d6c-82be-4504-8a47-a379c793568b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blahblah blahblah...terraterrra terraterra...bombombomb bombomb...
War is a good thing, because it gives * something else to play with, other than his Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. All this saber rattling is working out nicely for oilmen, too.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. So now
all gas all 110 tons of gas :rofl:

110 tons of gas make 10 nuke aaah ok weapon hmmmm
What nonsense is all this

Uuuurgh undersecretary of state
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. They could have lots of things.
But it is very unlikely that actually they have enough weapons grade enriched uranium for even one bomb. in fact there is no evidence that they have any weapons grade enriched uranium at all. Iran is legally allowed to enrich uranium under the terms of the NNPT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who is Robert Joseph?
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/jspecial071803.html

Jason Vest, writing in The Nation, identified Joseph as one of a group of policymakers associated with the pro-Israel Center for Security Policy:

"At this writing, twenty-two CSP advisers – including additional Reagan-era remnants like Elliott Abrams, Ken deGraffenreid, Paula Dobriansky, Sven Kraemer, Robert Joseph, Robert Andrews and J.D. Crouch – have reoccupied key positions in the national security establishment, as have other true believers of more recent vintage."

Joseph is among the chief advocates of "counter-proliferation," – as opposed to "non-proliferation," – which seeks to use the issue of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons as a pretext for war rather than a reason to engage in disarmament negotiations. If a dangerous wackiness is a general characteristic of the neocons in government, then surely the National Institute for Public Policy's 2001 report "Rationale and Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Forces and Arms Control," in which Joseph collaborated, bore all the hallmarks. As William Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca put it, the report recommends "developing a new generation of 'usable' lower-yield nuclear weapons, expanding the U.S. nuclear 'hit list' and expanding the set of scenarios in which nuclear weapons may be used."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Could" is the operative word. I "could" win Publishers' Clearinghouse too
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Even if they have the gas, it will take them years to process it
with their current facilities. Iran claims to be upgrading
its capacity but that is much easier said than done and
it remains to be proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Americans aren't buying it this time...
They can flap their neocon jaws all they want, but if Bush (overtly) attacks Iran before the midterms, the Repugs in congress are going to be out on their asses.

I can't post this article enough:

Iran Can Now Make glowing Mickey Mouse Watches

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Despite all the sloppy and inaccurate headlines about Iran "going nuclear," the fact is that all President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Tuesday was that it had enriched uranium to a measly 3.5 percent, using a bank of 180 centrifuges hooked up so that they "cascade."

The ability to slightly enrich uranium is not the same as the ability to build a bomb. For the latter, you need at least 80% enrichment, which in turn would require about 16,000 small centrifuges hooked up to cascade. Iran does not have 16,000 centrifuges. It seems to have 180. Iran is a good ten years away from having a bomb, and since its leaders, including Supreme Jurisprudent Ali Khamenei, say they do not want an atomic bomb because it is Islamically immoral, you have to wonder if they will ever have a bomb.

</snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. And of course it's also fair to say
that Joseph is INDEED the EASTER BUNNY.

The MEDIA needs to be IMPEACHED FIRST. If This was the French Revolution, it wouldn't be the Aristocrats heads that would be rolling for the pleasure of the crowd, it would be TV PERSONALITIES, LIARS, DECEIVERS, CROOKS.. they should be held accountable for FAKING a war for profit and shipped off to the Hague along with the rest of these war CRIMINALS for a TRIAL..

Let them report the news to the vermin inhabiting their cell, on suicide watch, interviewing RATS and roaches as they wait to be hanged for MURDERING a big chunk of Humanity for sheer PROFIT and egos.

Put assholes like this clown "diplomat" in Rubber Rooms down in Crazy Town where they belong and please bring us some intelligent HUMAN BEINGS to run the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC