Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cal Thomas says Iraq is the most dangerous and important war America has

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:13 PM
Original message
Cal Thomas says Iraq is the most dangerous and important war America has
EVER fought. In a recent column he rakes the generals over the coals for daring to speak out. "They are encouraging the enemy and no good will come from the comments of these former leaders".....(implies they are traitors). Also he says, "As President Bush has repeatedly stated, if we don't defeat them over there, they will come after us over here."

I have heard that Cal Thomas's column is in more newspapers than any other political commentator so when I read stuff like this I can't easily dismiss him (much as I'd like to).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cal Thomas
A talking head covered with Shinola.

Ignore him.

You'll be surprised at how easy it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. His column may be covered in scads and oodles of newspapers, but
that doesn't mean the brain dead lying moran MF'er knows what he's talking about. He's nothing more than a scab on the knee of this planet. Lying idiot bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow, Cal is still around?
I remember him in the NY Daily News way back in the 80s. His pic looked old then.

He was way right back then... but, it seems he's become a typical Republican these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I suppose he would not mind speaking German, goose stepping
and gassing jews? Just askin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Needless to say. Cal Thomas military service = zero.
Just another cowardly chickenhawk who loves to watch war on teevee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. And I say, Bulls**t. His opinion is no more valid. There was a small
number of radical 'terrorists' that did and would like to strike on American soil. With the help of Chimpy, that number has been raised by a thousand-fold. However, if even a small percentage of the money we're wasting in Iraq had been used to fortify our ports, guard on energy plants, and put into surveiling that core group, we might have been a whole lot safer. Bush is after an expanding empire and control of the ME, so as to corner the market on oil and cut China off at the knees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's still telling the lie that 'they' were in Iraq. This is getting
really old, and I doubt too many will fall for it anymore ~ no one I know is even open to hearing these old lies now. Even those in my family who made the mistake of voting twice for this administration. And when they wake up, they are even more angry than those of us who have known they were lying all along. Let him spout the lies. The system is beginning to work at last, and one by one the lies are being uncovered.

Few Americans will take the word of six, maybe more, (Shinseki and Clark are two others) Generals lightly, and his attempt to paint them as traitors is as despicable as all the other smear campaigns launced against anyone who speaks the truth. It's their MO. Even Fox viewers aren't buying the lies anymore.

It's reaching critical mass, the mountain of people coming forward, from the Military, the CIA, the FBI and speaking out, is making it more and more difficult to counter. To use a Cheneyism 'they're in the last throes' and Cal Thomas only serves to remind us of of their vile tactics of smearing and lying about anyone who dared to disagree with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Keep grinding out the propaganda Cal.
You lost whatever shred of credibility you might have had, a looooong time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Y'know, this is like, admitting they're fighting us over there because...
it's easier to kill us over there.

That's why they're not working hard to kill us here. It might make us do something disadvantageous to the enemy like leaving Iraq, where they can kill us over there so they don't HAVE to kill us over here.

I'd love to see someone attempt to refute my argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Aw shit Paul Harvey is on more radio stations
than anybody else and I don't have any trouble ignoring him. You can do it. Forget Cal he's a tightassed creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I do my best to ignore him......really!
It's just that he appears at least once a week in our paper and yesterday's column was by far the biggest one on the opinion page, so I worry that people will read this drivel and believe him. Fortunately, the paper does print Molly Ivins occasionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. If this Cal Thomas is the same one I read in the 70s then
he is also one of the biggest idiots around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The one and only.....I just read that his column is in 540 newspapers
I guess a lot of editors think highly of him....hard to figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Blinded By the Might...
that was name of a book thomass wrote, a few years ago, a warning against the 'unwarranted' accretion of power and priviledge by the rightwing, especially the christian, in US politics, based upon the observation that "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"...looks like the old user been taking some mind altering drugs lately- maybe the overthrow of the clinton democracy has something to do with the old reprobate junkie's mood swing(?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cal Thomas is a treasonous swine.
Spineless, lickspittle(*) traitors like him should be tried and locked away.

(* With thanks to G. Galloway for reviving a good insult.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Found this little tidbit on him:
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:cshGpGoMZagJ:www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas021804.asp/+Cal+Thomas+military+service&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4&client=firefox-a

In 1965, I enlisted in the Army in order to avoid the draft because I was told
the chances of getting a good assignment (non-combat) were greater for enlistees than for draftees.

I pulled some strings and was assigned to Armed Forces Radio and Television in New York
where I fought Commies at Broadway and West 57th Street.

When the bureau closed and moved to Washington, lower ranking enlisted men like me
were to be shipped to Vietnam, not to serve in combat roles but to broadcast to troops from Saigon,
which I was already doing from New York.

I was married with kids by then and had served about half the time I had promised the Army when I signed up.
I requested and received an early and honorable discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "fought commies"?
He is disgusting. How dare he criticize the generals. I can't understand why newspapers keep him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's grasping at straws
just think what a sucky job he has right now.It's all pure fiction hope he has the correct college background for his new writing style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPaine77 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cal Thomas' Logic (?)
We heard this same scheiss during the Vietnam War: "If we don't beat them in the Mekong Delta, we'll have to fight them in San Diego and San Francisco". No AK-wielding bo doi were ever spotted paddling ashore at La Jolla Beach after Saigon fell in 1975.

Vietnam or Iraq, do people like Thomas EVER fight? Or do they always find "different priorities"? And can anyone really think that trying to separate warring factions in Iraq is more important than beating the Confederacy and reuniting the country in the Civil War, overthrowing European autocracy in WW I, or defeating the Axis in WW II?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC