Whether he had the authority to do so or not is irrelevant. I don't think he did, but that's beside the point.
Furthermore, if the leak, declassification or whatever it is was done for the benefit of national security, why didn't Bush come forward and personally make the disclosure? At a press conference or during a televised address? Why the deception about not knowing anything when he obviously knew?
Where I come from, by the way, a deception is a type of lie. Maybe it's different in Texas. It was probably different in the home of Mr. & Mrs. G. H. W. Bush, given the way they raised their sons.
In any case, why all the cloak and dagger about Mrs. Wilson? Why did she have to be brought into this? The questions at hand were:
- Did Saddam attempt to buy yellow cake in Africa?
- More specifically, did Saddam attempt to buy yellow cake in Niger?
- Was Ambassador Wilson mistaken in reporting that Saddam did not make such an attempt in Niger?
- If not, was there an actual attempt by Saddam to buy yellow cake in Niger or some other African country which Mr. Wilson was not sent to investigate?
The answers to those questions appear to be
No, No, No and
No. However, if they were anything else, a simple and straightforward explanation from Mr. Bush would have served everybody much better. It is also curious that no one outside Mr. Bush's inner circle knew that the NIE had been "declassified" until earlier this month. Do we classify declassifications now?
The fact that Mr. Bush made an erroneous assertion about an attempt by Saddam to buy yellow cake in Africa in the 2003 SOTU might normally be written off to human error, except that Bush and his people got nothing right in their case for war against Iraq. There were no weapons; there was no reconstituted nuclear program; there were no working relationships with international terrorists. The problem for the Bush regime posed by Wilson's story that by July, when it ran in
The New York Times, no one was asking the above questions. Rather, there was only one question that was being asked:
- How did these idiots, who seemed to know so many specific facts about Iraq weapons, weapons programs and terrorist connections, manage to get them all wrong?
The reason, one might say, is because they weren't looking for facts, they were looking for talking points.
Almost all the evidence that has come to light since Wilson's revelations in
The New York Times support that point of view.
Related thread:
With Drumheller's story, defense of the regime becomes untenable]/i] started just before noon PDT by your humble servant.