Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Loopholes? They're tight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:24 PM
Original message
Loopholes? They're tight

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag/article.pl?articleId=31315

By: Christina Le Beau February 09, 2009

With "card check" top of mind, some opponents have dug up an old National Labor Relations Board regulation and claimed that many small businesses are exempt from union activity. That's not necessarily true.

In a 1959 ruling, the NLRB established that it would have jurisdiction only over private companies doing business across state lines and meeting certain minimum sales levels: $500,000 for retail and $50,000 for non-retail (though certain industries have special limits). Those figures remain the same today.

But that doesn't mean employees at those companies can't organize, or protest and attempt to negotiate better working conditions. It does mean, however, that in doing so, they would be on their own, with no NLRB protection against unfair labor practices.

That said, "It's actually very easy for us to assert jurisdiction over employers because interstate commerce doesn't have to be direct," says Gail Moran, assistant to the regional director for the NLRB in Chicago. It could be argued, for instance, that a local restaurant doing business with a cross-state food supplier is engaged indirectly in interstate commerce.

Which is why, in practice, very few employers are exempt, says Jules Crystal, a former NLRB trial attorney who now represents companies as a partner at Bryan Cave LLP in Chicago.

And many employers would rather have NLRB involvement anyway. "In most cases, when a union comes knocking on an employer's door, that employer would rather have the (NLRB's) rules and regulations and case precedent to rely upon, and thus the board's jurisdiction on its side," he says.

A bigger issue for workers at many small companies is how the NLRB defines "employees." The NLRB won't certify a union unless it includes at least two non-supervisory workers, and the definition of "supervisory" is under debate. Thus some small companies could be exempt on those grounds alone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC