|
Edited on Fri Apr-01-11 11:24 AM by SHRED
Not "gravy" at all. In fact, it would be difficult to call this a retirement because after 20 years there is no way to afford it considering health insurance cost. As you can see, one month of retirement check barely covers health insurance costs.
My guess is that this is fairly typical of a public worker pension. With all the rhetoric about how gravy the public employee has it I thought a dose of reality would be in order.
This is a snapshot from where I work for a city in SoCal. The position chosen is from our labor group and it is what is called a "benchmark" position. They use this position for figuring our wage comparisons.
---
We do not participate in the Social Security program We have no retirement health insurance benefit
74% of CalPERS participants receive $36K or less in annual retirement income Our labor group’s average falls within that 74% range CalPERS pension costs impact only 1.8% of the State’s General Fund
The following calculations assume age 55 plus 20 years of service eligibility as per our contract
Construction Maintenance Worker II at highest pay step
Annual Gross Pay $45,219 CalPERS Calculation 2% x 20 years of service = 40% PARS Calculation **see notes .7% x 20 years of service = 14% CalPERS + PARS Calculation 54% of wages
Yearly Retirement Income $24,418 yearly retirement income Monthly Retirement Income $2035 per month retirement income
Current Monthly Health Insurance Costs for employee (plus one) retiring at age 55 Anthem POS $1,812.64 Anthem HMO $1,565.24 Kaiser $1,409.44 Blue Card (out of area) $1,776.84
** In order to receive the .7% PARS benefit the following restrictions apply:
Employee must have at minimum 20 years of service. These 20 years must be served with the City of *** exclusively. These 20 years are non-transferable to or from any other agency. No exceptions.
|