|
different aisles took more or less time depending on if you were throwing (that's the 1980s night-stocker term for "putting the groceries on the shelf") soup or cereal, to use two examples. It also depended, of course, upon how big the order was on any given aisle.
We were never timed, however. There was, rather, a rough consensus about how long any given aisle should take to throw. If a guy (and we were all guys, BTW) was lagging behind one night on an aisle, his "aisle-buddy" (the guy two aisles down from him; aisles to stock were assigned in twos per person, with exceptions I will discuss below) would usually double-back and help him finish up.
Older associates, now that's an interesting conundrum. We had a couple of guys in their late fifties (I considered that ancient at the time; not so much now, of course), who had been with the store a long, long time. Good workers, but they obviously weren't going to keep up with college-aged guys in the prime of their lives. The night manager assigned them to throw one aisle apiece, and then go back to aisles #2 & #3 respectively and start on the facing. This was the two older guy's job after they threw one aisle, and looking back, it was the right way to distribute the work.
"Facing" is when you start at one end of an aisle and working your way down it to line up all the products nice and neat on the shelves, so they look professionally done, like in a TV commercial. After all the rest of the store was "thrown," and we'd all taken a break, the rest of us would join them in facing the rest of the store till quittin' time. It was also the time you were supposed to make sure the most dated stock was toward the front, so they would sell first. Usually you took a basket along with you so you could toss any beat up or damaged-looking product in the basket: customers absolutely will not buy a product that looks damaged unless its discounted.
I doubt WalMart will be so kind or equitable - all they care about is efficiency, efficiency, efficiency.
|