Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Georgetown Models Catholic Social Teaching During Food Service Workers’ Union Campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:32 PM
Original message
Georgetown Models Catholic Social Teaching During Food Service Workers’ Union Campaign

http://www.americamagazine.org/blog/entry.cfm?blog_id=2&entry_id=4105

Posted at: Sunday, April 10, 2011 03:20:57 PM
Author: Clayton Sinyai

The other day food service workers at the nation’s oldest Catholic University announced that after a lengthy campaign their union, UNITEHERE, had been recognized by their employer. The whole story has been retold elsewhere – but for those familiar with union organizing, the relative civility of the campaign was notable. In large measure, this was because Georgetown took seriously its obligation to implement Catholic Social Teaching.

Georgetown, like most major universities and many other large institutions, contracts out its food service work. The dining hall workers were not employed directly by Georgetown but by their vendor, the multinational corporation Aramark. While many firms and organizations use contracting to escape social responsibility, Georgetown used its position to model fidelity to Catholic social principles.

Millions of food service workers in restaurants and cafeterias around the nation work for poverty-level wages. (A full-time worker earning the US minimum wage of $7.25 per hour will draws an annual salary of only $15,080, well below the $18,530 poverty threshold for a wage-earner with two dependents.) However, since Church teaching forbids paying “wages …insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved wage-earner,” the university maintains a Just Employment Policy requiring contractors to pay a “living wage” to their employees. Georgetown’s Living Wage required a $14/hr compensation package in FY2008, with annual adjustments tracking the rate of inflation.

This living wage protects all workers serving the Georgetown community, whether or not they belong to a union. But it meant Aramark did not have to fear that in the wake of unionization a competitor paying minimum wages could easily undercut their prices and take away their contract. The food service workers’ union campaign was an economic challenge for management but not a catastrophe to be resisted at any price.

FULL story at link.

Refresh | +6 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC