Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LaHood “had no idea” air traffic controllers were tired

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 05:55 PM
Original message
LaHood “had no idea” air traffic controllers were tired

http://peoplesworld.org/lahood-had-no-idea-air-traffic-controllers-were-tired/

by: John Case
April 19 2011

Under questioning by CNN reporter Candy Crowley today, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood claimed he "had no idea" air traffic controllers were tired or under stress when, in recent weeks, several controllers - including one at Reagan National Airport - were found to have been asleep while on duty, as pilots seeking to land tried to contact the control tower.

But this problem did not start yesterday. It started 30 years ago when President Ronald Reagan fired the air traffic controllers who had held a sick out protesting the very conditions that led to this debacle. And it has been ongoing, only coming to public light in when, with FAA permission, the airport named after the jerk who started it all reduced its staff to a single controller.

Duh - an approaching plane found no one in the tower answering!

According to the New York Times, William R. Voss, president and chief executive of the Flight Safety Foundation, a nonprofit group based in Virginia, said the Federal Aviation Agency had so far failed to address what should be its primary concern: sleep-deprived controllers.

FULL story at link.

Refresh | +17 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Emblematic of the degree to which this administration is "in touch" with working folk
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. it's also what you get when you "cross the aisle"
for help. LaHood is a republican. I doubt he even changed parties when he began working for a democratic president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No. The Republicans haven't need to change. The Democrats are doing the changing for them.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. private industry would never let this happen...
i doubt ray knew that this was happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder if LaHood flies public airways?
( and I cannot help being creeped out by his name)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this what the PATCO strike was about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I worked at National Airport from
1969 to 1979 as a ticket agent. During that time it was scary how rapidly the Air Traffic Controllers aged. They got old, almost overnight. They worked long shifts, lots of overtime, and were probably short staffed much of the time. The Patco strike was about working conditions, and I will never forgive Lane Kirkland, then head of the AFL-CIO in letting Reagan get away with firing the air traffic controllers.

In addition, people who don't do shift work have no idea how difficult it can be, especially if the shift rotation isn't one that fits natural rhythms. A nine hour turnaround isn't bad if it's an overnight turnaround -- getting off at 9pm and needing to be back at 6am, for instance, but if it's getting off at 9am and needing to be back at 6p, or off at noon and back at 9pm for the overnight, well that's not one that is at all condusive to getting adequate rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gee thanks, Ronnie. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC