|
1. Tokyo: ugly, disorganized, an architectural jumble with no street names, but made up of urban villages where everyone knows everybody else, remarkably safe, even in low-budget surroundings, possessing the world's most comprehensive and well-run transit system, conformist but full of quirky people, hyper-modern, and yet blessed with surprising pockets of traditional Japan
2. San Francisco: No other American city looks or acts like San Francisco. I'd live there if I could afford it.
3. Portland, Oregon: I did live there and still would be there if it hadn't stopped working on a personal level. Splendid natural setting, real neighborhoods, progressive values, and the best transit system of any city of its size.
4. London: the city that literally has everything. High marks for history, museums, performing arts, ethnic diversity, and restaurants. Low marks for high prices and slummy areas.
5. New York: Same advantages and disadvantages as London, only not as old.
6. Nagano, Japan: A beautiful natural setting in so-called Japan Alps, and the ability, unusual among Japanese cities, to modernize without destroying its heritage
7. Hereford, England: An odd choice, to be sure, but I spent a week there in August attending a music festival and found it to be attractive, friendly, and located in lovely countryside.
8. Toronto: A true world city with people from every country on earth, but clean, safe, and accessible
9. Seattle: Another splendid natural setting and typical cosmopolitan delights, although its traffic, resistance to transit, and ugly suburbs bring its marks down
10. Vancouver: Like Seattle but more concerned with urban planning and amenities and with an incredible number of Chinese restaurants
|