So What?

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Run time: 01:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCW-Su2NG2w   Posted on YouTube: December 15, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: December 16, 2008 By DU Member: Amerigo Vespucci Views on DU: 662

 

[quidam56]

1. Bush Legacy ?

Bring 'em on, Mission Accomplished, So What? Bush and his buddies are bombing our mountains in a shock and awe fashion, They sure like blowing stuff up don't they ? http://www.wisecountyissues.com, Appalachia is a toxic third world waste dump and his attitude is "so what?"

[Twinguard]

2. Fantastic!

Thousands of our countrymen killed and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed over "So what?"

I don't have enough words to describe my contempt for Bush. He makes me sick.

[Virginia Dare]

3. He's totally incapable of feeling shame, guilt or embarassment..

this is the cost of having a psychopath in the White House.

[awoke_in_2003]

4. k&r. nt

[truth2power]

5. His facial expression...whenever someone is asking him a question

he plasters on that fake smile and his eyes don't match...they're just vacant. I don't want to offend anyone here, but it makes him look like a simpleton. He does this all the time.

Someone should tell him it's not necessary to put on a fake smile like he's so enjoying it when being asked a question. Inappropriate affect.

[LiberalLovinLug]

6. al qaeda is "becoming defeated"?

WTF does that mean?

In almost every sentence he utters there is a confabulation of falsity and illiteracy, it's hard to keep up. "there have been no major attacks since I've been Pres.....since 9/11..." Yeah that was only 8 months into your term and after being warned by Richard Clarke and others about the determination of al qaeda to mount something in America soon. Still we have had no apology from him about that. And now you notice that little slipup by other wingnut pundits. "NO major attacks ...since 9/11, like Dubya really only was just getting started at that time. I mean come on he was still wiping the sleep from his eyes after his record breaking vacation time in Crawford, to get some power rest before ACTUALLY starting his job.

Also he deflects one challenge on a lie with yet more lies. He defends himself in his false implied assertion that al qaeda was setting up in Iraq before the invasion with a "so what"? (if you can call that a defense) And then goes on to utter "first of all in the post 11 environment Saddam Hussein posed a threat." When it is clear now that he did NOT pose a threat to the US.

And that has been the operating procedure for Bush on down to his minions at FAUX News and every right wing pundit on the air. If you get caught in a lie, talk over the host and spew out another lie or two as you do it. A way of clouding the air with so much truth-confusion that if one lie doesn't stick maybe the next one will. And TV hosts just are not, for the most part, trained, or even want to, deal with this behavior. If the MSM hired real journalists who actually had as much passion for their profession as these soldiers of the right have to spread sh*t around, these kinds of tricks would not work.