Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taxi to the Dark Side and the 2002 death of taxi-driver Dilawar in Bagram.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 03:50 PM
Original message
Taxi to the Dark Side and the 2002 death of taxi-driver Dilawar in Bagram.
 
Run time: 03:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP4J9KhWzEU
 
Posted on YouTube: November 10, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: May 25, 2009
By DU Member: madfloridian
Views on DU: 1232
 
This is a review of the movie which I have not watched yet.

From Brave New Films:

Jonathan 'DJK' Kim reviews the documentary 'Taxi to the Dark Side'.

Alex Gibney's Oscar-winning documentary 'Taxi to the Dark Side' tells the story of the Bush administration's torture policy through the case of Dilawar, an Afghani taxi driver with no ties to Al Qaeda who was tortured to death while in US custody at Bagram prison.

To learn more about the film, visit http://www.taxitothedarkside.com/.


Here is more about the death of Dilawar from Oath Betrayed, a book about the torture we have done.

"Oath Betrayed"..The 2002 death of Dilawar. From our early days of torture in Bagram.

Dilawar was a twenty-two-year-old farmer and taxi driver, whom American soldiers tortured to death over five days at Bagram Collection Point in Afghanistan in December 2002. When the soldiers pulled a sandbag over his head, Dilawar complained that he could not breathe. He was then shackled and suspended from his arms for hours, denied water, and beaten so severely that his legs would have been amputated had he survived. When he was beaten with a baton, he would cry "Allah, Allah!," which guards found so amusing that they beat him some more just to hear him cry. During his final interrogation, soldiers told the delirious, injured prisoner that he would get medical attention after the session. Instead, he was returned to a cell and chained to the ceiling. Several hours later, a physician found him dead. By then, the interrogators had concluded that Dilawar was innocent and had simply been picked up after driving his new taxi by the wrong place at the wrong time.

Dilawar's death was predictable and preventable. The counterintelligence team was inexperienced; only two of its thirteen soldiers had ever conducted interrogations before arriving in Afghanistan. The officers knew that President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld had ruled that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to Afghanistan. The interrogation policies were unclear. The base commander had ignored Red Cross protests about the treatment of prisoners, including the practice of suspending them. Army and intelligence officers who knew of the ongoing pattern of abuses at the Bagram facility did not intervene to stop them. In fact, another prisoner, Habibullah, had died at the same facility under similar circumstances six days before Dilawar's death.

An autopsy on December 13 found that Dilawar's death was a homicide, caused by extensive and severe "blunt force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease" (inexplicably, "coronary artery disease" is typed on the death certificate in a different font). The Pentagon reported that the prisoner died of natural causes. Later, a coroner testified that Dilawar's legs were "pulpified" and that the body looked as if it had been "run over by a truck." Soldiers delivered the body and an English-language death certificate to his wife and two daughters in January 2003. The family could not read English.


This was done in my name, though at the time I did not know of it. It appears at this time there will be no consequences for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Google Video has it and the link is.......
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2987535946644608661

I will watch it now since I have not seen it. I know about the story and the young man's tragic death at the hands of his oppressors.
Sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the link.
I am watching parts of it now.

Since this won an Oscar, why are we afraid of a few pictures being released? I see it is in several languages off to the right of that link. The world knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I have watched about half today.
It is so hard to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was in the Army, no way I would do this to anyone.
No, don't tell me I would have.

I would have to be been killed first.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know I could never have done such things either.
I know it for sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. This movie was hard to watch.
Not everybody who has served is bad.

Some of the army personal seemed to have enjoyed it.

Maybe it was just me but they didn't seem to see what they did was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. they betrayed you and the other Americans who have served with honor
A couple of ex-Marines I know were just sick with horror after they saw the film. I've never been in the military -- I'm not even American -- but my heart goes out to all the veterans and current service personnel who, as you say, certainly are not bad like the stories we've been hearing. So many are trying their best (and, I feel it's important to mention, preventing things like this from happening).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, you are right. Most military would never do that.
Much of my family is retired military. They would never have done such things. I was especially appalled at the Captain Carolyn Wood. I don't know what happened to her if anything.

Atlantic war correspondents post


Her full testimony - if revealed - should be instructive. But, as a Captain, Carolyn Wood was implementing, not formulating policy at either Bagram or Abu Ghraib. By all accounts, she was a "can-do" soldier, popular with her soldiers (she would send post cards home to their families) who was trying to make things work for her superiors. Yet no written orders have been produced to show us what senior officers had authorized interrogation techniques in Bagram that were forbidden according to the Army Field Manual. So where did the orders come from?

In her testimony to the Senate, Wood claims that she first saw a power point presentation about new "aggressive" techniques approved for Guantanamo in January, 2003. Yet there was already a very "aggressive" program going on in Bagram - complete with sleep deprivation and overhead shackling - that resulted in the murder of two detainees in December 2002.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. "...beaten so severely that his legs would have been amputated had he survived."
"...Later, a coroner testified that Dilawar's legs were 'pulpified'..."


In our name, with our tax dollars. We are a nation of torturers.

Thanks for the post. I've added the movie to my queue. It will be difficult to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I have watched a little at a time.
Then I pause it and watch a little more.. very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. i saw it about 6 months ago.
i think it was on HBO. very upsetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC