Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Sullivan Has Questions About Sarah Palin's Baby!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:12 AM
Original message
Andrew Sullivan Has Questions About Sarah Palin's Baby!
 
Run time: 10:25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6W62fWQ8SI
 
Posted on YouTube: December 08, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 08, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 4968
 
Andrew Sullivan: I'm Breaking From The Right


Reacting to prominent conservative blogger Charles Johnson's announcement that he would not follow the right wing off a cliff, Andrew Sullivan is offering his own reasons for parting with the movement.

Johnson, who blogs at Little Green Footballs, wrote on Monday that fanatic politicians, racism, sexism, anti-Islamism, hate speech, conspiracy theories and other troubling trends on the right wing have led him to make a formal break.

"The American right wing has gone off the rails, into the bushes, and off the cliff," he concluded. "I won't be going over the cliff with them."

Andrew Sullivan, though not as consistent a conservative as Johnson, felt compelled to emphasize his own separation from the right wing. Among other things, he writes:


I cannot support a movement that holds that purely religious doctrine should govern civil political decisions and that uses the sacredness of religious faith for the pursuit of worldly power.

I cannot support a movement that is deeply homophobic, cynically deploys fear of homosexuals to win votes, and gives off such a racist vibe that its share of the minority vote remains pitiful.

I cannot support a movement which has no real respect for the institutions of government and is prepared to use any tactic and any means to fight political warfare rather than conduct a political conversation.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/03/andrew-sullivan-im-breaki_n_378625.html


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Bizarre
Her own variation of the immaculate birth.. Oh the pain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. they made their beds, now they have to lie in them
no sympathy from this quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Were you born enlightened?

How was humanity blessed by those who never needed to learn, grow, or change?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Except that we ALL suffered for THEIR ignorance.
and while they were suffering in their ignorance, they wanted liberals like me rounded up in camps, monitored by Homeland Security, and demanded the evaporation of MY rights.


If they were the only ones to suffer for their lack of enlightenment, I would have some sympathy for them.


now, what was your condescending snark again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Rounded up in camps?
Edited on Tue Dec-08-09 11:17 AM by jberryhill
Liberals were rounded up in camps? At Andrew Sullivan's demand, no less.

Man, I need to pay more attention to the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Why so snarky?
The poster said "they wanted" not "they did."

And even if the Palinistas didn't come right out and say what they wanted, the implication was clear.

Sarah Palin was once a pretty face with an empty mind and a stone cold heart. Not anymore. It seems as if the stone cold has taken over her looks as well. Ugly is as ugly does, and Palin has gotten less pretty with every ugly though that somehow formed in the intellectual void that consumes her vapid and arrested cognitive process.

Why you defend her is a mystery. She aint that cute anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. LOL... defending Palin, that's rich
Edited on Tue Dec-08-09 04:15 PM by jberryhill
Um, no, I was actually defending Andrew Sullivan for going after her, and suggesting that people do change their minds. When they change their mind to our side, that is not a bad thing.

But thanks for playing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Well thats entirely different
Why didn't you say so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Too busy...

...trying to keep Lerkfish behind the barbed wire of the FEMA camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
39. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. That was cool. I like the way he expresses himself.
We need to get away from labels - that's one of the funniest things about the "Conservative radio hosts" - you're a liberal or a conservative; black or white. They don't understand someone who's not one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMNinFL Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Radio hosts?????
You should go on some of the right wing message boards. It will absolutely blow your mind. I love to go into a few of them, and drop a post here and there. The crap starts flying like you wouldn't believe!!! They believe Democrats and Liberals can do NOTHING right. Absolutely NOTHING. Fun to watch!!!!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. I do read some of the op-ed pieces and I agree
those are tremendously one-noted. Not sure how much of that I could stomach frankly.

Also, I notice a lot of them call themselves "independents" but they still continually express support for republicans and disdain for democrats. I believe this is to distance themselves from a failing party and/or to give the appearance that they judge everything on its own merit (it just happens that they ALWAYS agree with the Republicans).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Exactly right about many who claim to be "independents". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I've noticed that too-
The way the hard core right wingers like to call themselves 'independents'. To add to that, when they are right wing religious nuts they usually will insist that they are simply 'christians', and won't let themselves be pinned down to a denomination (I suspect many of these people don't actually go to church, but get most of their spiritual sustenance from watching Kenneth Copeland on TV)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. Most people aren't going to admit they're right-wing
extremist batshit crazy. In their minds, they're sitting at God's right hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Not even to themselves-
Most of the really batshit crazy right wingers seem to see themselves as conservative centrists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMNinFL Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. It's worse.....
when you get into their message boards. The "independents" call themselves "conservatives". Palin is a goddes. Mr. Obama is a socailist/Marxist/commie, Nanci Pelosi is a whore, and Harry Reid is a fool. It never changes. If you bring up race they go crazy in denial. If you bring up Bush created problems they just say it's a a cop out. If you bring up the "Tea Party Rally Goers" and the witchdoctor and Hitler signs, watch out. The fun will be more than you can stand.

If you all want a good board to go to let me know. I'll pop you a url.

I'm kind of a moderate, and they hate me. Go figure. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Well, a lot of the talking heads I hear
identify themselves as "independents" when they talk about voting and later they'll say they're "Reagan Conservatives" which I think translates to "submissive to God" in our language.

What I don't get is the people who call in and ask advice. You'd think at some point, they'd say, "hey, even I could sit around and say 'liberal bad' and 'conservative good'.

If you rely on a Rush Limbaugh to tell you what's right and wrong, while identifying yourself as an independent, can you really convince yourself that you think for yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. People should relentlessly question whether the baby is Sarah's.
If Palin's going to go around and continue her crusade that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, he pals around with terrorists and whatever, then turn the tables on her regarding the baby, her family's association with that Alaska secessionist group and her whacky religious ties.

I think there's more substance to those subjects than the ones that she helps perpetuate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. But the funny thing is
when Palin was governor she constantly made reference to the fact that there should be separation from church and state. That religion should not be a part of government. So now that is wants to get cozy with the nutty religious freaks and to possibly get their vote, she wants to join them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. when Palin was governor she constantly made reference to the fact.....
that she will obviously say (but not do) anything she thinks will get her ahead. She doesn't believe in anything but is only worried about how she appears to others. Now the funny thing is, she's transparently bad at it to the point she means and stands for nothing...but Sarah of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. a gift basket!
that is pretty funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. I want one of those.
Lots of cool stuff in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. right?
me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am so with him on the baby story. Sarah either was hoping something would happen
to the baby or the baby is not here's. I just thought it was weird that all the pictures on line of her family the year before suddenly dissapeared and did anyone see that video of an interview with her a few weeks before the delivery? She was walking fast from her home to the office in heels while drinking coffee and talking...I don't know about anyone else but I waddled at that point in my pregnancies. That video seemed to have dissapeared too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It is a BS story all around ...
replace Sarah Palin with Hillary Clinton in a story about a mother whose water broke in TEXAS, got on an Fin airplane and flew to ALASKA, got in a car and drove home or wherever the F it was, to have a baby, and the right/MSM would have PILLORED Hillary for being a horrific mom in placing an unborn child at risk.

Seriously, we would have heard NO END about how "liberals" hate birth so much, the mother was so calculating and callous to do that ...

But, with the Palin STORY, it is about a strong mother going to have her baby in Alaska ...

WHAT ... THE ... FRUCK ...

Like everything else with this lunatic/freakshow, it doesn't add up ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. You figured it right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. This picture was taken when Sarah was "pregnant" w/ Trigg


Sure looks likes Bristol is the one w/ the baby bump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes this is the picture I saw and saved then it dissapeared.
How were they able to stop the truth. This seemed so obvious to me. And then Bristol missed 5 months of school becasue she had Mono or something. When Sarah did finally return from her trip hours after her water broke she didn't go to the closest hospital but to a small one that was futher away and it didn't seem to have a record of the baby being born on the day she said it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The whole thing is Kabuki Theater (the book tour)
She is touring to promote a book that anybody w/ a brain knows she didn't write.

She is pretending to ride a bus as she flies on private jet.

Acting as a leader after she quit as governor.

With a baby she claims to be the mother of that she didn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stables2010 Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. all the while pretending not to be campaigning for president
Palin supporters are the anti-thesis to American exceptionalism, I bet others countries get a good laugh, she was selected as a VP candidate and she has enough repub support to become their nominee.(shudders, only because I love my country)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why do people insist on lsitening to this worthless POS?
Why? Do you knwo what filth this man is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. I agree.
Sullivan was one of W's biggest cheerleaders. He needs to crawl back under his rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkoDonkey Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
48. No, we need to hear more from him
He is, ultimately, the kind of conservative I'd like to see more of. He isn't a right wing radical, he is a conservative.

Has he taken positions in the past (like supporting W in 2000, like supporting the war in Iraq early on) that I disagree with? Of course. But when he's wrong, he admits it. Rather than see that kind of voice "crawl back under rock," I wish it had the same support in the GOP as the likes of Limbaugh, Beck and Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesatemple Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. I'm at a disadvantage here...I'm ignorant of the facts that
someone (anyone) might use to come to the conclusion that Andrew Sullivan is a "worthless POS" and/or "filth". Still, with that personal deficiency aside, wouldn't it be reasonable to applaud any sign from such a man that he has or is beginning to "come around" to a political philosophy more in line with that of a "progressive"? Or, more particularly, his moving away from supporting the madness of the fundamentalist right wing posturing?

For those good folks here that believe in, what I call, the ancient myths, do you remember the assertion that Saul, while traveling on the road to Damascus, was converted by Yahweh into the disciple of Jesus known as "Paul"? While I don't have any confidence at all with regard to the verity of that story, it seems to me that the basic tenet of the tale is valid: Few have a past so perverse that change for the better is not viable.

I have no knowledge of the past of Andrew Sullivan, a deficiency that I intend to rectify at some near point in the future. Yet, the knowledge that I gained from the OP's video of Sullivan's stated positions on the craziness exhibited my many of those members of the conservative party persuade me to believe that he and I agree on many points. And, even with the benefit of knowing about Sullivan's past, whether good or bad, I would withhold judging him until I can determine whether his future actions support or belie his stance recorded in the video.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I agree with you. I don't know this guy but the fact that he was
republican and is able to see the irony of the direction the party is going is fantastic. I just can't understand how "thinking people" can follow those leaders. My faith in the human being has been restored as people come out and say they don't know why people are following the Glen Becks and Rushs and the Sarah Palins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesatemple Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. That's a great user name! Anyway...
it is difficult for me,too, to comprehend the popularity of folks with which we disagree in our political philosophies. The foibles of the conservative party seem so self-evident to many of us on the left. Yet, I have to remind myself, nearly half of the citizens who voted in the past presidential election supported the conservative candidates and, by extension, the right wing political platform. Most often, I find myself attributing that fact to ignorance, or religious fanaticism, or blind, robotic obedience, or self-interest, or some other reason that doesn't justify their position.

It hardly ever occurs to me that those good folks just have an opinion that differs from mine; a considered opinion which they support unreservedly. For that reason, I personally would refrain from labeling someone with whom I disagree as a "POS" and/or "filth". As a Secular Humanist, my religious views are at odds with that of nearly all my friends here in East Texas and, perhaps, most of the rest of the Country. Still, I don't condemn folks or label them with derogatory names merely because their religious philosophy varies from mine.

Happy holidays!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. I loved the basket gift. And his saying that Obama is a thoroughly decent man. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Common ground with the likes of Charles Johnson, at last.
Thing is, we have ALWAYS had common ground.

MOST Americans, left AND right, want food, education, and healthcare for ourselves and our families.

MOST Americans want the chance to work and be happy.

MOST Americans are NOT full of hatred.

From that common ground, the only difference is HOW we achieve our wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. I don't believe the story about Trig's birth either! She's lying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. Good interview and surprise, I find I like Joy Behar.
I'm as conservative as Sullivan if I'm to go by what I just heard. Hmmmm... :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. Joy is a Joy. I always respected Andrew Sullivan, he'a a reasonable
conservative. I wish there were a few more of them to listen to.

Andrew is good for America, and conservatives like him are a true blessing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. That was a great segment and I really liked her.
Big surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. why isn't he a dem? so silly. there are dems who are watchdogs of the treasury & he's socially lib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
41. Photos prove Palin was NOT pregnant...
Edited on Tue Dec-08-09 05:19 PM by Tx4obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. I look forward to reading his "work" in the Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC