Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General McChrystal: We Are Going To Be In Afghanistan Long Term! Well Past ANY Dates!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 12:19 AM
Original message
General McChrystal: We Are Going To Be In Afghanistan Long Term! Well Past ANY Dates!
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 12:35 AM by democracy1st
 
Run time: 08:52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2IWNvcquzg
 
Posted on YouTube: December 17, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 18, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 1157
 
http://MOXNews.com/
December 16, 2009 CBC The National


More wars courtesy of The Military Industrial Complex & The Goldman Sachs admin


New estimate for Afghan war: $1 million per soldier


Senior administration officials reported to the New York Times today that budget projections for the war in Afghanistan will cost U.S. taxpayers at least $1 million per soldier, per year.

The plan to add 40,000 American troops and greatly expand Afghan security forces, supported by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan, is estimated to cost between $40 billion to $54 billion annually. “Even if fewer troops are sent, or their mission is modified, the rough formula used by the White House...appears almost constant,” according to the NYT.

The new estimate for the cost of war in Afghanistan will cancel out the $26 billion savings projected for a 2010 troop withdrawal in Iraq. Under this scenario, the overall military budget could rise as high as $734 billion. The highest annual military budget during the Bush era was $667 billion.

A senior administration official speaking anonymously with the NYT said that concerns over politically volatile spending influenced the President during a White House meeting on Wednesday. Obama was insistent that each military plan incorporates the quickest possible exit strategy. “He knows we cannot sustain this indefinitely,” the official said.

In 2006, Congressional researchers estimated that the accumulated costs for each soldier in Afghanistan would be about $390,000. The sharp rise in costs reflects the increase in mine-resistant troop carriers and surveillance equipment, in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The unique difficulties of transporting soldiers around the mountainous, isolated terrain in Afghanistan also burdens U.S. taxpayers, military analysts say.

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/estimate-afghan-war-1-million-soldier/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. More backpedaling on withdrawal.
How reminiscent of the previous admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck mcchrystal and the MICs war. Obama needs to stop acting like a prison bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. "They just want to live" but the US has decided their country is of strategic importance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why is this man in charge of anything?
He's likely a war criminal and should be behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Time for his "commander in chief" to reprimand him. Send him to the brig.
This guy is challenging Obama and if Obama doesn't know it, we are in deep trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Obama only reprimands Liberals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, funny he and most of his merry Dems only find their spine when it comes to neutralize liberals
Maybe it is time for us progressives to show the same level of disgust as the right seems to have for him.

I am beginning to think the whole DLC clan is made up of emotionally f*cked up a**holes who not only respect abuse, but actually crave it. This administration seems to act like an abused spouse who is all hell-bent in gaining the validation of their abuser at any costs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. the REAL reason we will never leave Afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. And this is supposed to be a surprise? NOT!
Pipelines, poppies, control of the region.. anyone who thought that we would actually be out of any of these places was only dreaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. "..will cancel out the $26 billion savings projected for a 2010 troop withdrawal in Iraq."
"The new estimate for the cost of war in Afghanistan will cancel out the $26 billion savings projected for a 2010 troop withdrawal in Iraq. Under this scenario, the overall military budget could rise as high as $734 billion. The highest annual military budget during the Bush era was $667 billion."

We cannot afford McChrystal's war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. does that include supplemental funding during Bush's admin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC