Sen. Obama in debate: Mandates bad - President Obama now: Mandates good.
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:28 PM
Original message |
Sen. Obama in debate: Mandates bad - President Obama now: Mandates good. |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just win and do what you want after that.
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. what's really galling is how BLATANT he is about this |
|
Arrogance is showing it's ugly head more and more with this *leader*.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I agree, and it saddens me |
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. It's the Shameless Arrogance we've witnessed over a variety of issues....specifically "pony" issues |
|
like choice, gay rights, etc.
|
ihavenobias
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I support Senator Obama. |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 02:45 PM by ihavenobias
Maybe we can build a time machine and he can travel to the present to talk some sense into President Obama.
;)
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. "Will the real Barack Obama please stand up?" |
erpowers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
17. That Is the Real Obama |
|
Obama has always been a politican who said what he needed to say to win. When I was looking for information on Obama during the primaries I found an article that claimed that was Obama's MO. He would campaign to whatever side of his opponent that he needed to campaign in order to win and then once elected he would do what he wanted to do. So, you are not seeing the real Obama.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I expected the outrage... |
|
...to be based on his stealing mandates from Sen. Clinton's campaign, not in supporting mandates in the first place.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. The reason many voted for him in the primary is because he was against Sen. Clinton's mandates. |
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Oops. Sorry Confused.. |
|
..my NOKIA's (No! Only Kucinich Is Acceptable) with my PUMA's.
|
liberation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Is it safe to assume that you don't have any reasonable justification for Mr. Obama's actions? |
|
Thus you being so quick to the ad hominems?
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I always associated mandates with Hillary. It confused me when it turned |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 03:22 PM by davidwparker
up in Obama's bill since mandates were such a bad thing.
Thanks for the clarification. Now, I can see that this is another change on the Chameleon's part.
|
liberation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Maybe Obama is trying to out-Clinton Clinton? |
|
That is just about the only reason I have left to explain this dude...
|
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
11. The Say Anything Kid! (as opposed to the say hey kid) - he'll do anything to get your vote! |
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. he tries to be all things to all people |
|
A progressive to progressives A centrist to centrists A neocon to neocons
I think it's clear he's a combination of the latter two.
|
change_notfinetuning
(750 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Maybe he was against mandates in the campaign ONLY because Hillary, his |
|
opponent was for them. Wow, that sounds Republican. "If you're for it, I'm against it." Seems to be their approach.
|
erpowers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. People Were Against Mandates |
|
I think Obama was against mandates during the primaries because people were against mandates. I think Obama took up the issue of mandates shortly after he won the Democratic nomination.
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
13. He was against mandates before he was for them. nt |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Well he can't be expected to actually do anything he promised. That was before he found out |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 03:57 PM by saracat
he was supposed to cave. They were just "words" after all.LOL!
|
rollingrock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Pathological liar, just lke Bush |
|
for this one, honesty is NOT the best policy.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.