|
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 01:05 PM by burning rain
For Obama to get his preferences is not as meaningful as, say, FDR or LBJ (whom she references), because Obama's preferences are an easier sell and relentlessly corporate-friendly, from Wall Street bailouts to a cosmetic credit card bill to health care, where Obama's crony capitalist preferences do not compare with the public, single-payer boldness of LBJ's Medicare. Even the Lilly Ledbetter Act is overrated: it continues to allow employers to treat women like shit provided they treat men like equal shit (now, EFCA would impress me, but that appears to be off the table). Obama's a couple inches to the left of the GOP, where FDR and LBJ were a good few yards. The way things are shaping up, it looks like the best we can hope for is for Obama to have a moderate conservative success rather in the mold of Bill Clinton and coast largely on personal popularity, the lunacy of the opposition, and hopefully a recovering economy--while cutting the legs out from under congressional Democrats by blurring differences with Republicans, as Bubba did.
I'll continue to look to Rachel for thorough reportage and smart analysis, whether or not I agree with her emphases--I sure as hell don't, here.
|