Nancy Skinner vs. Ann Coulter on CNBC talking Obama and regime change

[SharonRB]

Run time: 05:07 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMyDUqMOUOY   Posted on YouTube: March 06, 2010 By YouTube Member: nancyskinnerlive Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: March 06, 2010 By DU Member: SharonRB Views on DU: 2375

 
Nancy takes on both Ann Coulter and Larry Kudlow on CNBC talking 2010 elections. Kudlow calls for regime change. Nancy says when it comes to economic policy, Republicans are hecklers and Democrats are heavy-lifters. Look at Clinton cleaning up Bush 1's mess and Obama doing some really heavy-lifting cleaning up Bush 11's economic collapse. It's so much easy to be a heckler than a heavy-lifter.




To find out when Nancy will be on TV and when she'll start podcasting, to subscribe to her newsletter, to get involved in her new Quantum Call and Prep Me! ventures, and more, sign up at http://www.nancyskinnerlive.com .

[Amonester]

1. "It's not about bush" my a**!

The gall of these repuke LIAR$.

So, AIG was not bailed out by paulson and bush now?

Another failed attempt to rewrite history!

[SharonRB]

2. Exactly what I was yelling at the TV when I watched this live

They have such short memories.

[Amonester]

4. No, they lie like that on purpose.

And without any shame at all.

[WhoIsNumberNone]

6. No, their voters do.

"Oceana is at war with Eastasia. Oceana has always been at war with Eastasia."

[Amonester]

3. I guess bush "kept us safe" and "did not bail out" AIG...

Nancy Skinner should have caught this one and she should have debunked their out-right LIE.

WTF

[WhoIsNumberNone]

7. Hard to do when they keep cutting her mic.

[tomm2thumbs]

5. Kudlow is so disingenuous, even HE can't pull off his fake enthusiasm for the subject

at least have the wherewithal to try and make it sound enthusiastic Kudlow, you sound like a GPS car map reader faking a story off the prompter

[Enthusiast]

8. SharonRB, why post this?

This is clearly two against one. Nancy Skinner is laughed at snickered at by both the host and Coulter. She is overtalked and doesn't even have a chance to express her argument. Fuck CNBC.

[SharonRB]

17. Nancy held her own, as much as they let her speak

Why not post it? It shows them for what they are and shows that we do have people on our side who are willing to go up against them.

[pattmarty]

9. I am probably going to get "bombed" for this, but the word cunt.............

..............I believe is good ONLY for one purpose, and that is to aptly describe Coulter. Her sole purpose seems to be making as much money as she can, and while doing that to start as much shit as "s-he" can. I put her in the same category as other useless human pieces of shit such as Savage, Malkin, Beck and Hannity. Christ, she EVEN makes O'Reilley ALMOST look sane. In any "normal" country she would be laughed at and satirized.

[LatteLibertine]

10. Agreed

Coulter is probably the only woman on the planet I'd call a cvnt.

She's a shameless manipulative attention starved sociopath, just like Limbaugh.

[bobhuntsman]

13. that's an insult to perfectly good vaginas the world over. . .

[lumpy]

14. This vagina has no problem calling Coulter for what she is.

Yes, a cuzzy.

[trusty elf]

16. If you rearrange the letters of her name...

you get, among other things, "no real c*nt".

[peace13]

11. I can't believe that I made it to 4 minutes!

Nancy should not have bothered going on this show. This man is a tool of the lowest, cushioned only by Coulter who I will refrain from labeling.

[PatSeg]

12. I thought I could get through the whole 5 minutes,

but 5 minutes of Ann Coulter is too much for me and Kudlow sounds like he should be on FOX.

[liberal_patriot_md]

15. He lost me at the start

when he categorized federal employees as making more than private ones and that they don't pay taxes. What a load of crap. Government contractors make loads more than federal workers doing the same job (factoring in comparable experience, education, etc.) and there are just as many tax cheats in the private sector as in the public sector.

The idea that Goldman Sachs and the Democrats are in some sort of cabal based on contributions is bunk. Yes, they did give a lot to Obama. But Obama raised a historical high of campaign funding. Also, take a look at Obama's list of top contributors -Microsoft, Google, University of California, Harvard University, Time Warner, etc. Top five contributors for McCain? All from the financial industry. Same for Bush in 2004. So let's not get things twisted. Also, it needs to be taken into consideration that they like to back winners and Obama was the winner.