|
The survey he cites has 4 choices of ways to cut the deficit. As it happens, those are the only 4 ways that can have a meaningful effect on the deficit. Tax the rich, cut defense spending, cut medicare, cut social security. So given those 4 choices, people overwhelmingly chose the first 2 options rather than the last 2 options. This is a very fair reading of priorities, and the people's priorities are not at all in line with those of the power players.
The rich, of course, do want to have their cake and eat it too. And they are getting exactly that. Their tax rates are at historic lows, and have been for 9 years or so, and yet there has been no spike in jobs created, as their theorists keep claiming must happen when you don't tax them. As for defense, it is absurd to think that we need to spend as much as the rest of the world combined in order to "stay safe". Also, the wars we have been running, were run off the books until Obama took office. So that, too, is a case of having one's cake and eating it too, on the part of the politicians who approved all of this nonsense.
So now the bill is coming due, and all of the sudden it is once again the poor and the middle class who must bear the burden. Never mind that Social Security funds were borrowed all those years, even though it is a trust fund specifically for one purpose. Never mind that there is another kind of trust being broken here, and they are trying to pull the rug out from under working people. As far as Medicare, well we all know that a universal single payer system would cost less overall and produce better results -- we know this because we have other examples in other countries where that is exactly the outcome.
Why you want to twist it into people wanting to have their cake and eat it too is beyond me. The rich and the powerful warmongers, that is *exactly* what they are *already* doing. It's about time we stopped tolerating it.
|