Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Reps. West and Gingrey Reject Payroll Tax Holiday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:53 PM
Original message
GOP Reps. West and Gingrey Reject Payroll Tax Holiday
 
Run time: 01:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNwnxtuzfpA
 
Posted on YouTube: September 09, 2011
By YouTube Member: ThinkProgress6
Views on YouTube: 982
 
Posted on DU: September 11, 2011
By DU Member: Shallah Kali
Views on DU: 992
 
GOP Reps. Dismiss Tax Cut For Working Americans In Favor Of Giveaways To Corporations
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/09/09/315751/gop-reps-dismiss-tax-cut-for-working-americans-in-favor-of-giveaways-to-corporations/

For instance, Tea Party firebrand Rep. Allen West (R-FL) rejected a payroll tax holiday completely on Fox Business last night, saying it has already been tried and that we should “cut this corporate tax rate” instead. Also on Fox Business, Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) said he had a problem with the payroll tax holiday because it goes to “people who are already working.” But in the next breath, Gingrey called instead for a tax break for corporations who have kept money overseas. Watch it:

These supply-side tax cuts do little to help the economy or create jobs, as has been shown time and again http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/11/business/economy/11tax.html , because wealthy people tend to save extra money instead of spend it. When Congress passed a tax repatriation holiday in 2004, as Gingrey wishes they would again, it had none of the intended employment benefits. Corporations merely pocketed their low-taxed repatriated billions and subsequently laid off thousands of workers. http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/05/14/173951/repatriation-flashback/

Corporations are not lacking cash, thus, a tax cut, which is aimed at freeing up more money to allow them to expand their workforce, would do little help unemployment. In fact, companies are sitting on trillions http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/08/17/pm-companies-sit-on-huge-reserves-of-cash/ in cash, yet are still refusing to hire, as this CNN chart demonstrates: http://johnkingusa.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/31/job-growth-vs-corporate-profit-growth/

A payroll tax holiday is clearly an idea that should appeal to Republicans, who claim that cutting taxes and regulations is the only path to economic prosperity. But as they have repeatedly demonstrated in their opposition to payroll tax holidays, it is only a certain type of tax cut they are really interested in — those for the wealthy and corporations http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/08/22/300832/republicans-to-oppose-tax-cut-for-working-people , not the middle- and working-class Americans who are the primary beneficiaries of the payroll tax holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two DU-friendly votes, on this issue at least.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. What, we're surprised?
They collect that, and spend the excess on wars and tax cuts for the rich. Yes, we are collecting more currently than we pay out. We've collected 2.7 Trillion more, and it lays in a vault somewhere, maybe actually, maybe figuratively in treasury bonds and bills, drawing what meager interest they pay these days.

In a way, cutting that particular tax isn't only the most stimulative tax to cut. It's just to actually cut some of the money we're paying in, that they are using in the general budget.

But why does that surprise you? Hell Reagan raised that tax in 1983, along with a lot of republicans and democrats, to fund his tax cut for the wealthy. We've been collecting tons of money ever since, we've spent on other stuff. And it really doesn't matter whose idea it was to start spending it on other shit, we've been doing it for decades now.

And, of course, it might actually help the economy just a microspit-bit. A little bit of nothing. Now actually using the 447 Billion to create 14 million jobs, at the smallish salary of 30K a year (sadly still about the max-out salary of my life), that would actually obliterate the 14.9 million unemployed we have now. There's a fix for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whatever they're for, I'm against and whatever they're against, I'm for.
Pass it. Right away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. WTF?
For instance, Tea Party firebrand Rep. Allen West (R-FL) rejected a payroll tax holiday completely on Fox Business last night, saying it has already been tried and that we should “cut this corporate tax rate” instead. Also on Fox Business, Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) said he had a problem with the payroll tax holiday because it goes to “people who are already working.” But in the next breath, Gingrey called instead for a tax break for corporations who have kept money overseas.

These tactics have worked so well in the last 10 years. And besides, I'm working, why would I need anymore money. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC