Lockheed Martin's CEO Is AFTER Your SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!
Segami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 10:51 AM
Original message |
Lockheed Martin's CEO Is AFTER Your SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK! |
|
Run time: 03:56
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVgvfnzwFPI
Posted on YouTube: September 21, 2011
By YouTube Member: bravenewfoundation
Views on YouTube: 330
Posted on DU: September 21, 2011
By DU Member: Segami
Views on DU: 1117 | :smoke: :smoke: "...Tell committee members to keep war contractors' hands off the money that should go to Social Security and Medicare: http://warcosts.com
The law that created the deficit committee also created a zero-sum game: Any expensive program that escapes the budget knife does so at the expense of cuts to other programs. If the military contractors succeed in keeping the war budget intact, they'll likely do so at the expense of Social Security and Medicare. That means money that would go to your Social Security or Medicare benefits will instead go into the hands of people like Lockheed Martin CEO Robert J. Stephens, who last year made $21.9 million, almost totally from taxpayer-funded military contracts.
This should an easy choice: cut the war budget.
.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. But rich people get richer from the war budget and the most important thing in the world |
|
is for rich people to get richer.
Teevee tells me that non-stop.
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It should be, but when multimillionaires are making the rules, it ain'ta gonna happen. |
|
Especially when they got their millions on behest of the war mongers, through their lobbyists.
"This should an easy choice: cut the war budget."
|
kenfrequed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And it should be looked at by any of the rah-rah sorts that thought the supercommittee was a good idea.
|
DocMac
(429 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
anyone on DU express any positive thoughts on the supercommittee.
Or anywhere else for that matter.
|
kenfrequed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Perhaps I presumed that there was some modicum of "trust the system" somewhere on the site that doesn't in fact exist. I guess getting burned on not getting a public option while the defenders of the finance committee blathered on really made me cynical.
But right, I haven't seen a hard defence of the supercommitte process yet, though I seem to recall a few "wait and see" people.
|
sam11111
(638 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |
4. "tax the rich" TTR - Buffet - how does that affect the Supercommittee zero sum game? |
JJW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Bribing public officials is free speech and corporations are people. War is peace, man!
|
ProfessionalLeftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-21-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
7. signed, tweeted, shared. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.