"or when he makes clear he wants gay rights protected?"

[Hoosier Daddy]

Run time: 02:25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hk8iO2lrx0   Posted on YouTube: September 27, 2011 By YouTube Member: johnnydollar01 Views on YouTube: 323   Posted on DU: September 27, 2011 By DU Member: Hoosier Daddy Views on DU: 1099

 
Megyn Kelly defends the booing of a gay soldier at the FUX debate. She apparently thinks it's bad if he got booed because he was gay, but perfectly kosher if the reason was his request for the protection of gay rights. The utterly shameful portion of this video runs from the 1:06 to the 1:54 mark.

PS: Anyone who replies "Oh my God that's not the ACTUAL TITLE OF THE VIDEO!!!" is anal beyond belief.

[CurtEastPoint]

1. Ms. Kelly is a ....

(an) idiot.

[johnnypneumatic]

2. Megan Kelly is lying

She says there were only 2 boos, there were more than that. She says they didn't boo because he was gay, they booed because of the question. How can she know what they were booing? They booed after the tape was over, that is what is true. Did they boo the soldier, his question, or both? They booed in disrespect of a soldier serving in Iraq.

None of the president wannabes objected to the booing. None thanked him for his service, or apologized for the disrespect from the audience.

[Swede Atlanta]

3. Please....................

The point is mute. The audience hates FAGS and they were not interested in giving this soldier any respect, regardless of his question. They are Nazi-like thugs.

[RyanPsych]

4. Did they boo him or the question?! What the f**k is the difference? Its basically the same

Did they boo a gay soldier serving? Or him inquiring about whether Republicans are going to force him back in the closet?

Maybe its my nightly vodka tonic, but I am having trouble finding much of a difference