|
In NYNEX, in Pacific Bell, Sprint, in core signalling research, programming engines, the best jobs i've ever got to do, working on those huge signalling designs that were, at the center, nothing more than a high speed transaction database that would run on any PC SQL server farm today.
Those companies have handled very private data regarding signalling (which is caller, called, time) for decades rather fairly. I never saw a security breach regarding data in the RBOC's in years of work with access to that very kind of data.
When i was in university, i worked as a 411 operator for a summer job for GTE, 'operator 107, what city please' with the LA basin phone books on micofiche. There was intense operator training regarding data privacy and overheard conversations, like if i overheard president reagan ordering crackdowns on aircontroller unions, i would never be able to testify to it in a court of law.... the phone companies have in past, been good guardians of that private data, partly in the days where Ma bell was still remembered, like a university temple in new jersey that would exchange luminaries to the regional operating companies... that collegiate atmosphere has surely been sold off since, farmed out to india, strippped clean and gone, but it was the real innovation climate that made the internet possible, and the people who mistrust them in that video are right to express concern, but i honestly believe that bandwidth will never again be an issue in our lifetime, no matter which way this bill goes. It has always been the mission of the telcos to push bandwidth to infinity, surely the bill is flawed, and the public has the right indeed (IMO) to oversight of the corporate operations so crucial to public integrity.
Where is the text bill of what he's talking about?
|