Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Jeff Merkley - Why He Did Not Vote For S 1867

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 06:12 PM
Original message
Sen. Jeff Merkley - Why He Did Not Vote For S 1867
 
Run time: 18:59
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKhjw7ZT7pU
 
Posted on YouTube: December 02, 2011
By YouTube Member: RonPaulFriends2
Views on YouTube: 211
 
Posted on DU: December 02, 2011
By DU Member: Dokkie
Views on DU: 2243
 
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can you tell us the reason why he didn't vote for it? I don't have time to watch a 19 min video
Edited on Fri Dec-02-11 06:21 PM by Tx4obama
Thanks :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What ^ said
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. In short, he is an actual Democrat
Also, he can read and knows his constituents can as well, and that we support his vote. We have the time for important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. He explains why he voted against it
Thinks it has vast expansion of powers of detention of American citizens in bill.
No 5th and 6th amendment protections.
here is jist of speech

Debate was valuable re 5th and 6th, philosophy and law.
Bill of Rights, protection against abuse of power.
Some say only clarifies what is already in law, others argued opposite, that detention
provisions in bill violate due process and speedy trial jury and confront witnesses against him or her
We all grow up believing in due process and govt cannot take life, liberty or property without due process of law
We all are due a speedy PULBIC trial by impartial jury of state. Accused able to confront witness against him and
assistance of counsel. All above relevant.
Section 1031 subtitle D
Affirmation of authority of armed forces to detain covered persons
referred to as enemy combatants
Historical exemption to 5 and 6 is is person fighting with enemy against US then do not have same
rights in time of war (WW2)
Treated as member of opposing army, historically extremely narrow exemption.
Should be substantial hurdles for state to claim you are an enemy combatant.
This bill has definition more lenient.
ie "a part of". ie if you gave a charity money unknowing that it might be used for taliban you would be in trouble
under this
human right defenders against say.. Saudi's which are a coalition partner might also be in trouble
What happens when govt suspects you say something

Case Brandon Mayfield born in Kansas, law degree in Topeka, army veteran, lives in Topeka and is a Muslim convert
FBI raided him believing he was terror mastermind behind bombings Madrid. Based on partial fingerprint match.
Under this framework the govt can label him enemy combatant and takes away his rights. Assigned attorney by executive branch. No right to speedy trial or public trial, ie no protections from state. Strips defendant of any power.Person could be locked away forever with no means of appeal under this bill.
Tonight we have stripped away the protections.

He hopes this continues to receive substantial attention and should have been hearings and not done so lightly and placed at last minute into defense bill.
Another feature of bill is creates presumption of certain types of crimes tried in military tribunals instead of criminal courts. 300 people have been tried civilian courts and found guilty and only 6? in military courts.
Law creates presumption will be tried in military court because they are better at it but evidence above says otherwise

Summary all we hold dear in constitution about our fair rights as citizens has been trampled tonight. Hope the supremes find a case so it can be thrown out.

No Prez should be able to say, you Joe American I am calling you an enemy combatant, I assign your attorney, I decide if secret or not, and if I decide you are guilty I am locking you up forever and you have no recourse.
Brandon Mayfield may have been in this situation but Spain said we have wrong guy and found the correct match and set him free but under new bill may never have seen light of day outside prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thank you for posting the summary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You are welcome. It is worth watching. Great speech. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
usrname Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. S 1867
is the bill that allows for indefinite detention of people, including american citizens (an amendment requires that american citizens can only be detained if outside the US). There shouldn't need 19 minutes to explain. 10 seconds is enough: it's against the constitution of the USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did Obama say he would veto this bill? Vote link ...
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-218

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1867

Also I read that an amendment by Feinstein took care of this portion of the bill.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jeff Merkley believes in true freedom, freedom from
an overly authoritative government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC