Haha! My Warning shy of two months after Pres. Obama's Inauguration!

[FrenchieCat]

I wrote an OP at the following link (archived, so I can link to it, according to the rules) http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=8263317

Wrote it on March 15, 2009.
This warning was based on a premonition I had at the time,
based on all of the trends to that point.
It could have been written yesterday.

Kinda of eerie. :scared:

[Peacetrain]

1. Wow.. you hit that nail on the head..

[Cha]

2. Thanks for digging this out, Frenchie,

We sure have had a lot of this as we knew we would from years of experience..

"I'm writing this because I want to encourage us all to read articles critically, and not to become Headline Reactionaries without noting the structure of any given article, the sources, and/or the possible agenda by the authors behind what we read in the "mainstream" media. There is a difference between what Obama directly states, and inferences made based on what some unarmed someone said he said, or worse yet, those "close to the administration" said."

This is another prescient warning from January of last year..

<snip>

"This will be the first year that we have a Democrat in the White House in the modern blogging age, and with that I do have a rather dire prediction. As the year progresses and we start seeing exactly how soon to be President Obama governs, some of the groups and organizations we all cherished for their work these past several years will quickly turn into something we can’t understand, maybe even bordering on entering the wingnut-o-sphere.

I predict this will start when/if Obama decides to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan. People quickly forget the key points of campaigns, and bloggers are no exception. We will hear a big out cry from some bloggers screaming that Obama is breaking campaign promises on Afghanistan, when in fact he will be doing exactly what he said.

As these groups transcend the depths, teetering on being progressive or just noise makers, make no mistake that they have some underlying drives to do so. One of the biggest is greed. We haven’t had a Democrat in the White House since blogging became an actual business and the sudden explosion of PACs. Don’t be confused on the greed though, a lot of it won’t be tied to money. Instead what we will see is a lot of greed tied to recognition and traffic. If you follow the blogosphere as closely as I do you can see this already evident, and a lot of blogs, which have transformed into a sole source of income, already fight for the almighty click. Clicks do lead to money also in the world of online advertising."

In Hope Over Fear's OP..

http://intoxination.net/jamie/my-big-prediction-2009

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=388x10251

So rw & lw attacks and here we are in the middle with President Obama and the ones who are working to fix the problems..not create more.

[FrenchieCat]

3. Yes, the tale tell signs were there......

and only those who have alway been mindful that Pres. Obama couldn't get our agenda passed
without our help (as he has always stated) understood this and have been patient and understanding of the way our system works, and the fact that change is very difficult when fighting the Status Quo, and even more so when fighting the Party of NO and its media minions.

It would appear that the rest are somewhat naive and wishful in their thinking, and that ain't
what politics is about in the real world of hard truths.

[Cha]

4. You're being kind

in calling them "naive and wishful" at this point but I'll go with that..and I also want to keep this OP kicked as it's a good reminder for anyone who's even, say..lurking.

[goclark]

5. Excellent K and Keep Kocked

[treestar]

6. Good point

about the blogging age. That puts everything under a microscope if you want it to.

[Cha]

7. Timeless useful information..