Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupid Stupid PUMAs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 12:05 AM
Original message
Stupid Stupid PUMAs
Do you know this is probably one of the very few times that I agree with the idiot UppityWoman.

http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/now-who-is-this-man-if-he-were-a-woman-it-would-be-important-so-nevermind

There is a real need for more women in politics. Iran has more women in politics than the US. A fact that should shame America.

Pumas supported Coakley, because of her loyalty to Hillary.

However because PUMAs love a bitter gossip monger who has a buzz, someone who is supposedly gay but "outs" a Republican he opposes, just before a Primary and who claims to have supported Hillary but really just opposed Obama says no to the woman, the so called pro woman PUMA group turns around and FULLY hates on the woman candidate. So much for sexism.

They are being taken in by a gossip monger. No wonder I call them stupid.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think we should leave the puma stuff out of here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I strongly disagree.
This is where we support President Obama and rather than use this as a corner to hide in, we should use this as a corner to expose their racism and find ways of dealing with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I agree with Sandsea, I feel that the use of an inflammitory term like PUMAs
only serves to inflame passions. If we hope to improve things here it will be by winning of hearts and minds, not by pissing people off or having fence sitters think we are some sort of fringe group (which I think using terms like PUMA paints us as).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. My mind must be going
because every time I see the term, I have to look it up all over again.

I supported Hillary in the primary, but I'm not bitter in the slightest, and I grin every time I see her as Secretary of State.

Things worked out exactly as they were supposed to. She's great, and so is our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps the story has changed because now at the link
Edited on Thu Jan-14-10 01:34 AM by rebel with a cause
there is a nude shot of Scott Brown. :blush:

So much for the puma controversy. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Look at her replies
(to be fair she let me reply). My targets are on "Hillbuzz". Heavily promoted by Rush Limpballs. I am building up sufficient evidence of them as a hate site campaigning for Brown; they raised a very large amount of money for Brown. If he does not want to be associated with hate he should give the money back.

In addition, as far as I am concerned, those associated with extreme right hate sites should NEVER be able to stand for the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Okay, I found it and agreed with you two
until it came to the health care reform. You did good though. She is something else and I don't think that is a good thing in this instant. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. All I can say is
I hope to God Coakley wins, or the health care bill is sunk before it ever got afloat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Possibly.
In some ways sinking it may be good, but not an agenda that says it goes too far. America will end up with nothing for the next 16 years. And yes I really do think it will be another 16 years before this is touched again.

If the Rethug is elected ahead of Coakley can you imagine what that will do to the blue dogs in the Senate. They will move so far right that Bush will look Liberal.

This is one of the main reasons I am really really pissed with people like the Green Party poster from that Stock Car racing State; they want it all to fail so that there is some happy pretty anarchic revival. Sorry it does NOT work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think the bill,
whatever form it takes, is worth passing as long as it does away with pre-existing conditions.

I've said it's my opinion that it will be 15-20 years before we see ANYTHING again if this thing doesn't pass, and I think that's true.

We really needed significant finance campaign reform before this was tried. It's so obvious that the legislators are too dependent on insurance company campaign contributions to be truly working for the American people on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are exactly right.
No one will touch this again for another generation. The initial reforms of equal rights and social security were a pile of crap but they were then improved.

If Coakley loses, the message sent is not that the bill is not good enough, it is simply that it goes too far.

(I do worry you have a video feed of me on your sig)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not to worry.
I do worry you have a video feed of me on your sig


We must be twins, then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Teaches me right
This part of DU is not private and remains searchable.

Lesson learnt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. BB, for what it's worth I appreciate your efforts on this site to expose the racism
within the Democratic party. Far too many like to pretend that racism and racial prejudice are only Republican/Christian/Southern etc. problems when in fact, they plague our entire society and always have.

The fact that educated, "liberals" who live in NYC and Connecticut or wherever are just as guilty of bigotry is something that I think everyone should be exposed to, because the people of color who live in these regions don't have the option of ignoring this stuff or pretending that it doesn't exist. I, for one, appreciate what you're trying to do on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC