Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"WHAT SESTAK WAS OFFERED"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:31 PM
Original message
"WHAT SESTAK WAS OFFERED"
"The year's thinnest, most vapid, most manufactured political "controversy" appears to be ending with a whimper.

President Obama's chief of staff used former President Bill Clinton as an intermediary to see if Representative Joe Sestak would drop out of a Senate primary if given a prominent, but unpaid, advisory position, people briefed on the matter said Friday.

Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, asked Mr. Clinton to explore the possibilities last summer, according to the briefed individuals, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the politically charged situation. Mr. Sestak said no and went on to win last week's Pennsylvania Democratic primary against Senator Arlen Specter.

The White House did not offer Mr. Sestak a full-time paid position because Mr. Emanuel wanted him to stay in the House rather than risk losing his seat.

When Sestak first claimed in February that he'd been offered a job, that was a bit of an exaggeration. The discussions apparently included a spot on the Intelligence Advisory Board, but even that was quickly dismissed as an idea because he couldn't serve on the panel while remaining in Congress.

So, what are we left with? Perhaps the dullest, most inconsequential White House "controversy" in a very long time.

The White House counsel's office prepared a memo, explaining the situation in a way that even Rep. Darrel Issa (R-Calif.) can understand: "There have been numerous, reported instances in the past when prior Administrations -- both Democratic and Republican, and motivated by the same goals -- discussed alternative paths to service for qualified individuals also considering campaigns for public office. Such discussions are fully consistent with the relevant law and ethical requirements."

Obviously. When the Reagan White House offered Sen. S.I. Hayakawa (R) a job in 1981 in the hopes of convincing him to drop out of the Republican Senate primary race in California, no one cared. When George W. Bush's White House approached Rep. Ben Gilman (R-N.Y.) about a job in the hopes of convincing him not to run for re-election, no one cared. Mundane political efforts like these fail to raise an eyebrow because they're the very definition of routine. As Ron Kaufman, who served as President George H.W. Bush's White House political director, said this week, "Tell me a White House that didn't do this, back to George Washington."

In this case, it's even thinner, since Sestak wasn't even offered a job, but rather an unpaid advisory position, which a) wasn't particularly enticing; and b) was quickly dismissed anyway.

Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, told Greg Sargent that this couldn't constitute bribery. "Beyond that, Sloan adds, the Federal bribery statute requires an offer of something of value in exchange for an official act. Sloan says that not running for Senate would not constitute an official act in any case, even if a paid position were offered in return for dropping a run for office."

The political world can now move on, hopefully feeling chastened for taking this nonsensical story seriously in the first place."

—Steve Benen 12:40 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (32)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. They just keep looking for a non-story to be a story
and they always have their Water Boys to tell us 24/7 whast to believe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, and too bad for all those who
were hoping this would bring down the White House..Suck it up, Vultures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. If they had bothered to look into GW's deeds
they would really have something to talk about but they were silent and they are still silent and they may never be tried for the pure evil that they did to this country.

My Dream is to be at the Hague if/when they are all on Trial.
Some may not technically be "guilty" but they still need to be
there .....GW, GHWB, Cheney, Condi etc. etc. etc.

I want to be standing outside and waving my sign " JUSTICE IS FINALLY SERVED"~ I don't care how old I may be - that is my Political Dream.

:fistbump:

I want to be sure that James Carville's name is on my Sign too.
He is the Manchurian Candidate to me.

Finish my rant for tonight! LOL



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It would definetly be a great Justice if
the US corporatemediawhores were put on trail for war crimes and treason along with those they conspired with.

:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. How sweet it would be to see Rush on Trial
and how about Rove for messing with so many elections and skating through it all! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans - a waste of perfectly good air
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Now they are pushing that there were two incifdents like this ~
What gets me is that this is not something NEW.

GW and ROVE must have done the "real deal" hundreds of times, but they make up crap about Democrats and they make it sxtick because the Media Mafia runs with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, I'm sure they are and guess what?
There may be more!! Shocking..fuck 'em if they can't take a Dem Admin doing their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC