Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perle: ‘I Have Very Little Doubt’ That Bush Would Order ‘Necessary Military Action’ Against Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:17 PM
Original message
Perle: ‘I Have Very Little Doubt’ That Bush Would Order ‘Necessary Military Action’ Against Iran
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) recently warned that the Bush administration is building a case against Iran. “This whole concept of moving against Iran is bizarre,” he said. When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) warned last week that President Bush does not have the authority to launch an attack against Iran without congressional approval, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino responded that she was “puzzled” because Reid seemed “to be fanning flames where there’s no fire.”

That’s not the view of Richard Perle, a leading neoconservative proponent of the Iraq war. Speaking at a conference this weekend in Israel, Perle suggested Bush would attack Iran before he leaves office:

“Would this president do it? I think that until the day he leaves office, this is a president that, if he is told, ‘Mr. President, you are at the point of no return,’ I have very little doubt that this president would order the necessary military action.”

<…>

“I’m not convinced that we have a lot of time. Given the peril that would result, its astonishing to me that we do not now have a serious political strategy with Iran,” he said, adding he thought regime change is “the only significant effective way” to deal with the Iranian threat.

“If we continue on our current course, we have only a military option. So what I’m urging, and this should have happened a very long time ago, is that we make a serious effort to work with the internal (Iranian) opposition,” Perle said.

Perle is reported to have once said, “The first time I met Bush 43 … two things became clear. One, he didn’t know very much. The other, that he had the confidence to ask questions that revealed he didn’t know very much.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/22/perle-iran-attack/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. The term "necessary" can mean one thing to a reasonably prudent
person and someone suffering from meglomania, paranoia, and sociopathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. My thoughts exactly.
:-( :scared: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU
And not just because you agree with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks!
Well, you know what they say about great minds... ;) (Actually, disagreement is fine by me, as long as it's somewhat intelligent. Yay progressives!) :) This seems like a pretty cool board, and I'm glad to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Hi Cabcere!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Right...if it were objectively necessary, I would hope he would invade.
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 03:14 PM by MJDuncan1982
But...his "necessary" is probably not anyone else's "necessary".

We've already played this game with "imminent threat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perle probably had to change his shorts after his pronouncement.
“I’m not convinced that we have a lot of time. Given the peril that would result, its astonishing to me that we do not now have a serious political strategy with Iran,” he said, adding he thought regime change is “the only significant effective way” to deal with the Iranian threat.

“If we continue on our current course, we have only a military option. So what I’m urging, and this should have happened a very long time ago, is that we make a serious effort to work with the internal (Iranian) opposition,” Perle said.

It worked so well in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. PNAC signator, perle
of course, he would think so! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Bush pulls a Gulf Of Tonkin Incident and merely says, Iran attacked us first
CIA would provide a torpedo or arrange the shooting down of a US. aircraft doing surveying's over Iran when it was shot down -- 9-11 Part-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush stated that he believes he is the only president (Dem or Repug) who would have the nerve
to use nuclear power against Iran. With the build-up of the added second carrier group stationed off Iran something big is going to happen, it's deeply in the timing. We have a deranged man with presidential powers, how do we make sure this NEVER happens again???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. like Rockfeller said "bush is a man who doesn't know the world"
okay, looks like we need more Rockfellers to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC