Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alberto Gonzales's Role in the Plame Cover-Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 12:18 AM
Original message
Alberto Gonzales's Role in the Plame Cover-Up
Everyone seems to have forgotten that then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales also presided over one of the more sordid aspects of the Plame scandal. When Gonzales first learned that the Justice Department had started an official investigation into the Plame leak, Gonzales waited twelve hours before putting the White House staff on notice that they had to preserve documents and electronic files. Which seemed than -- and seems now -- like an open invitation to "shredding and deleting," not to mention getting your story straight. In short, obstruction of justice.

And it's not as if Gonzales dithered trying to make up his mind what to do. He told White House Chief of Staff Andy Card about the investigation right away -- many hours before sending the official notification to preserve all evidence.





Here's how Senator Harkin described the sequence of events back in October 2003:

On September 26, the Department of Justice officially launches its investigation.

Interestingly, it took 4 days after that "official" launch for the Justice Department to call White House Counsel Gonzales and notify him of the official investigation. Gonzalez then asked for an extra day before the Justice Department gave the White House the official notice, which means all documents and records must be preserved.

A recent letter was sent to the President from Senators Daschle, Schumer, Levin, and Biden which also expresses concern about this break from regular procedure.

They wrote:

Every former prosecutor with whom we have spoken has said that the first step in such an investigation would be to ensure all potentially relevant evidence is preserved, yet the Justice Department waited four days before making a formal request for documents.

Interestingly, the letter goes on:

When the Justice Department finally asked the White House to order employees to preserve documents, White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales asked for permission to delay transmitting the order to preserve evidence until morning. The request for a delay was granted. Again, every former prosecutor with whom we have spoken has said that such a delay is a significant departure from standard practice.

Lest you think this is much ado about nothing, consider that when Patrick Fitzgerald came looking, key emails to or from the Vice President's office mysteriously could not

http://www.discourse.net/archives/2007/03/alberto_gonzaless_role_in_the_plame_coverup.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney/Rove/Gonzales....The ones that will NEVER leave...the truly wicked, the architect, the slime
Edited on Sat Jun-02-07 01:45 AM by GreenTea
that finds way to make it seem acceptable, hmmm...as needed!

Our government, whom the Dems coward.

Long live the King!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. January 2009
I think they WILL leave - it is just a matter of time :woohoo:

But you are right, it feels like we are watching water boil... :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Assuming they are not allowed to steal ANOTHER election.
And make no mistake. They fully intend to steal it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. why does a "decapitating" attack seem so plausible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't understand your question. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh, it's just that the recent directive that gives Bush dictatorial powers
is based upon a decapitating attack taking place. It just seems very ominous to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. There is another way to avoid further investigations and prosecutions.
Ensure that the new Democratic President is one of the insiders, and will simply drop ongoing investigations and not seek further prosecutions....like Clinton in 1992.

In order to give the appearance of a Democracy the Party that controls government must appear to change hands every decade or so. But if you examine our history since the late 1950's, even though the Party in control swaps hands, nothing really changes.

In fact, changing Partys gives an excuse to drop criminal prosecutions in the spirit of "bipartisanship" and "National Healing" while behind the scenes, its business as usual. Rich White mega-criminals go free.


It would appear that the Democratic Party Leadership is content to let the Bush* administration "run out the clock". I really don't expect to see any high level criminal prosecutions. The Democratic Party will close ranks with the Republican Party to protect the system.



"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for posting this. I've never understood why this
self made opportunity of Gonzo's wasn't thoroughly investigated. Just think of all the damage Gonzo has done since....disgusting. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. kinda like letting a VP sober up before questioning shooting a friend in the face
Edited on Sun Jun-03-07 12:35 AM by PuraVidaDreamin
Strange times we live in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC