Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Risking nuclear war, neocons tried to reverse China policy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:29 AM
Original message
Risking nuclear war, neocons tried to reverse China policy.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/02/risking-nuclear-war-neocons-tried-to-reverse-china-policy/

Risking nuclear war, neocons tried to reverse China policy.

“The same top Bush administration neoconservatives who leap-frogged Washington’s foreign policy establishment to topple Saddam Hussein nearly pulled off a similar coup in U.S.-China relations — creating the potential of a nuclear war over Taiwan, a top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell says.”

Lawrence B. Wilkerson, the U.S. Army colonel who was Powell’s chief of staff through two administrations, said in little-noted remarks early last month that “neocons” in the top rungs of the administration quietly encouraged Taiwanese politicians to move toward a declaration of independence from mainland China — an act that the communist regime has repeatedly warned would provoke a military strike.

The top U.S. diplomat in Taiwan at the time, Douglas Paal, backs up Wilkerson’s account, which is being hotly disputed by key former defense officials. <…>

While Bush publicly continued the one-China policy of his five White House predecessors, Wilkerson said, the Pentagon “neocons” took a different tack, quietly encouraging Taiwan’s pro-independence president, Chen Shui-bian.

“The Defense Department, with Feith, Cambone, Wolfowitz Rumsfeld, was dispatching a person to Taiwan every week, essentially to tell the Taiwanese that the alliance was back on,” Wilkerson said, referring to pre-1970s military and diplomatic relations, “essentially to tell Chen Shui-bian, whose entire power in Taiwan rested on the independence movement, that independence was a good thing.”

Wilkerson said Powell would then dispatch his own envoy “right behind that guy, every time they sent somebody, to disabuse the entire Taiwanese national security apparatus of what they’d been told by the Defense Department.”

“This went on,” he said of the pro-independence efforts, “until George Bush weighed in and told Rumsfeld to cease and desist told him multiple times to re-establish military-to-military relations with China.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where have all the neo-cons gone.? They seem to have
disappeared. Fukuyama, for example, now says, "Who me? Not me!" Jonah Goldberg says he wishes the term "neo-con" would not be used anymore (at least in polite company.) Have they become an endangered species? Should we try to protect them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They too must be stuffed
... so America remembers. Each can have its own display case listing its most memorable policy recommendations as part of a national Museum of Stupid. This Administration would doubtless occupy a large building of its own, but there'd be a few years to start building the next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're just trying to get out of paying the $3 B a day we are borrowing
mainly from the Chinese.

Yes, that's 3 BILLION a day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC