NYTimes Editorial: "What 'Support Our Troops' Entails"

[Hissyspit]

Editorial
What ‘Support Our Troops’ Entails

Published: June 3, 2007
Whenever and however American troops withdraw from Iraq, a flood of wounded and psychologically damaged veterans will present the nation for decades to come with costly needs that already are overwhelming government services.

The backlog of disability claims stands at more than 405,000, with cases averaging 177 days to be processed — almost twice the backlog for civilians. Experts estimate that an additional 400,000 claims will be filed in the next two years.

At the same time, better battlefield care is sending veterans home with severe brain traumas that might have been fatal in earlier wars. Complex new treatments are required for these survivors and for veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms of depression that veterans groups fear are driving up suicide rates.

Congress is taking the lead in prodding the Bush administration, which shamefully underestimated the cost of treating the wounded. The House is sensibly budgeting $6.6 billion more than last year for veterans health care and processing claims. A series of other measures approved by the House tackle only some of the problems but point in the right direction. The Senate should act quickly on these proposals, which include:

CLICK LINK FOR LIST

[babylonsister]

1. Where is that link, my friend? nt

[dave_p]

2. Let the googles be your friends

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/opinion/03sun1.html

[babylonsister]

3. Thanks. I thought you couldn't access the NYT immediately, and in

some instances you can't. Anyway, thank you.

[dave_p]

4. Yes, lots of it seems subscriber-only

... but luckily we're allowed in this time

[Hissyspit]

5. Thanks. n/t