Which money would that be, mr. bUsh?
The 0.5% wage increase YOU OPPOSED, mr bUsh? The 0.5% increase you called "unnecessary", mr. bUsh?http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/military_payhike_whitehouse_070516/Or perhaps you mean the proposed increased survivor benefits of $40 a month to spouses of those who lost someone in military service...that YOU OPPOSED? That too is "unnecessary, mr. bUsh?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/legislative/sap/110-1/hr1585sap-h.pdfMaybe it's money for the the proposed increase to US troops' danger pay...that you so vehemently opposed and in fact wanted DECREASED?http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030814-110411-2389r.htmCould it be funds for more body armour...that you opposed? Healthcare for vets...that you opposed? VA access for reservists...that you opposed?If the "money for the troops" you whine of is for things such as body armour and up-armored vehicles, better you just give the troops the money directly, mr. bUsh. Because after 5 years of war and our troops still short of body armor and protected vehicles, you & your cronies obviously can't do the job.Inspector General report; New Pentagon Audit Confirms Troops Sent into Iraq and Afghanistan Without Adequate Equipment, Armored Vehicles, while Reconstruction Funds Squandered by Perpetual Waste, Fraud, and Abusehttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0701310151jan31,1,7037579.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true