Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

APPROPRIATIONS VETO THREAT SEEKS TO FORCE CUTS IN DOMESTIC PROGRAMS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 12:00 AM
Original message
APPROPRIATIONS VETO THREAT SEEKS TO FORCE CUTS IN DOMESTIC PROGRAMS
APPROPRIATIONS VETO THREAT SEEKS TO FORCE CUTS IN DOMESTIC PROGRAMS

Is it necessary to wait for appropriations bills to be written before threatening to veto them? Not for some key players in Washington. The President’s director of the Office of Management and Budget Rob Portman sent a letter to Congress on May 11 saying he would recommend vetoes if appropriations bills exceeded the President’s budget proposal, and after the Congressional Budget Resolution was passed, issued a press release repeating that challenge. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/pubpress/2007/051607_budget_conference.pdf)

Also promoting the sight-unseen veto strategy are members of the House Republican Study Committee (RSC), a group of more than a hundred very conservative members. They are circulating a letter to be sent to the President, vowing to vote to sustain his vetoes of sight-unseen appropriations bills. (http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/spend-veto.pdf) So far, they report that they have collected 135 signatures. They would need another 11 votes to deny a veto override in the House, assuming all members were voting. The Republican Study Group will not release the names of signers until or unless they collect the requisite 146.

Human needs advocates, loathe to see the hard-won gains of the Budget Resolution jeopardized before the first appropriations bill reaches the floor, are mounting an effort to persuade House members not to sign the RSC letter. They are hoping a substantial number of Republicans will take the advice former Appropriations Chair C.W. Bill Young (R-FL) offered to the Administration, as quoted in CQ Weekly, “I would probably suggest seeing what the bills look like before he threatens vetoes.” National organizations are co-signing a letter to House Republicans that will be delivered when Congress returns from its Memorial Day recess. The advocates’ letter points out that the veto threat is “pure and simple a declaration of intent to cut badly needed services below today's already inadequate levels.”

The difference between the President’s recommended total for appropriations and Congress’ Budget Resolution is $23 billion. While that is only 2.4 percent higher than the President’s figure, it allows Congress to provide above-inflation growth for domestic programs. The President’s budget would force cuts in those programs.

So far, four House Appropriations subcommittees have approved $9 billion more than the President requested. The majority of subcommittees have not yet reported out bills, with Labor-Health and Human Services-Education, Agriculture, and Transportation-Housing and Urban Development still to come. The House hopes to complete floor action on all appropriations bills except defense by the end of July. The Senate expects its committee work to be done by then, with floor votes later. After the House and Senate work out their differences, appropriations bills must be signed by the President before the October 1 start of the new fiscal year. That sets up September as the key time for vetoes and override attempts. Between now and then, advocates must show the need for increased funding for programs including health care, nutrition, housing, education and other vital services – and show the harm of further cuts.

http://www.chn.org/humanneeds/070601b.html



TOLL FREE CAPITOL HILL SWITCHBOARD NUMBERS:

    1 (800) 828 - 0498

    1 (800) 459 - 1887

    1 (800) 614 - 2803

    1 (866) 340 - 9281

    1 (866) 338 - 1015

    1 (877) 851 - 6437

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. He goes from a president who doesn't veto
to one who vetoes without reading the bill.

How bipartisan of him. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's a Uniter not a divider!
:eyes: :sarcasm: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. He threatens to veto and he wins...that's what he learned
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 09:49 AM by Zodiak Ironfist
Thats why he is now threatening to veto everything.

We only emboldened him with our capitulation on the Iraq war funding bill. He knows his cronies in Congress will back him and then the opposition will give him everything he wants out of fear.

This is what happens when you refuse to fight. The enemy comes and robs you blind in broad daylight because they know they can make you piss your pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC